Screensaver Demo
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : News : Screensaver Demo

Author Message
Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 41203 - Posted: 2 Aug 2010 | 21:24:54 UTC
Last modified: 2 Apr 2011 | 6:18:37 UTC



This thread will be continually updated with the screensaver progress in its final stages. Here is the latest screenshot of the wedge and galaxy backdrop with the current Sagittarius stream estimate provided by David R. Law et al. Adding color uses considerably more memory for pre-drawn frames along with a decrease in speed, so at this time, a trade-off would have to be made between having real-time motion and having color given that only a small portion of the CPU is dedicated to graphics. Color seems to be the popular choice so far, but additional votes are welcome.

Click here for a full size image.

Paralax
Send message
Joined: 2 Aug 10
Posts: 1
Credit: 2,184,378
RAC: 0
Message 41206 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 4:02:15 UTC - in response to Message 41203.

Sweet!

ztmike
Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 447,355
RAC: 0
Message 41209 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 5:45:54 UTC

You never did say if GPU crunchers can use this screensaver in the other thread..

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 41210 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 6:28:36 UTC - in response to Message 41209.
Last modified: 3 Aug 2010 | 6:49:34 UTC

The explanation given for GPU interaction could have seemed a bit cryptic in retrospect. In short, yes, any application, whether it interacts with the GPU or not will function, albeit a little more slowly while MilkyWay@Home is crunching on a double precision floating point GPU. The screensaver does not rely on GPU's so it should have no effect for or against the screensaver.

There are nearly a dozen applications which will be integrated with this screensaver, including ATI, NVIDIA and CPU versions for Mac, Windows, and Unix-based operating systems. I plan to release CPU versions first, NVIDIA shortly after. The ATI version will take a bit longer as it is currently under major redevelopment and I have to wait for it to be completed by those working on it.

Koen Visser
Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 10
Posts: 5
Credit: 9,460
RAC: 0
Message 41211 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 7:33:13 UTC

awwww, i just got a new iMac with a ATI card.. and now i have to wait longer. :(
by the way, my vote is on colour! Is the yellow bit the part that we crunched?

Profile David Glogau*
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 09
Posts: 172
Credit: 645,240,165
RAC: 0
Message 41212 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 8:12:07 UTC

Great work Shane:

I tend not to use screen savers myself, but I appreciate the effort you are putting into this project.

Question: I run up to four GPU's at a time, so how would this affect the screen saver, if at all?

Kind Regards
David
____________

Profile Werkstatt
Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 08
Posts: 297
Credit: 105,742,273
RAC: 76
Message 41219 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 11:31:34 UTC

Really looks nice! Great job!

Alexander

Profile Werkstatt
Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 08
Posts: 297
Credit: 105,742,273
RAC: 76
Message 41220 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 12:00:44 UTC - in response to Message 41203.

[quote]Color seems to be the popular choice so far, but additional votes are welcome.
quote]

No change, still voting for color!

Or would you like to eat a black and white steak, chicken or salad? And how do you think about a grey bear?
I spend some FLOPS for a nice background!

Alexander

Profile The Dreamer*
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Mar 09
Posts: 11
Credit: 253,928
RAC: 147
Message 41221 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 13:41:06 UTC

Hi David, Hi everyone here! Despite a less amount of CPU job during screensaver mode, I think a nice and colorful one would be a good promo for the project: you know, many BOINC users choose projects depending on a brilliant graphic or not. I think you can try to develop a screensaver nice for the eyes and not so "vampiric" for the CPUs: the main result for the project as credits growth will tell if we're right!
In my humble idea, of course ;-)

Greetings!

The Dreamer

____________

Profile David Glogau*
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 09
Posts: 172
Credit: 645,240,165
RAC: 0
Message 41222 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 13:54:17 UTC - in response to Message 41221.

Hi Dreamer

I agree with you, color is important.

Cheers
David
____________

Profile Beezlebub
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 07
Posts: 18
Credit: 38,429,435
RAC: 0
Message 41223 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 14:12:18 UTC

Another vote for color!
____________
"There is no limit to the amount of good a
person can do if they do not care who gets credit for it."


Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 41225 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 14:52:38 UTC - in response to Message 41211.
Last modified: 4 Aug 2010 | 2:05:23 UTC

Is the yellow bit the part that we crunched?

-Koen Visser

Yes, the SDSS wedge spanning out from Earth is used to determine the best fit for the Sagittarius Stream. The wedges are displayed in yellow because only the F-stars are shown. F-stars have the least error when calculating star position. The bright spot on the wedge indicates where the stream (shown in blue) intersects it although the precise position and shape of the stream is the problem that is being solved (the stream shown is one of many estimations). A different wedge is calculated every month or so and the compilation of the results is ongoing (as is the SDSS survey).

I've modified the demo image for this thread to include a more accurate model of the Milky Way by changing the original ESO image that the Milky Way stars are sampled from. Seeing the change may require refreshing the browser (ctrl or apple-R) for those who are viewing it a second time.

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 41246 - Posted: 3 Aug 2010 | 23:54:13 UTC - in response to Message 41212.
Last modified: 4 Aug 2010 | 0:49:55 UTC

I run up to four GPU's at a time, so how would this affect the screen saver, if at all?

-David Glogau*

It shouldn't effect the screensaver adversely at all. I was told by the person that wrote the NVIDIA GPU code that the GPU applications free up the CPU by about 90% although 4 GPU's I imagine might use about 50% of the CPU at idle. If the screensaver were able to tap this resource it would change matters altogether. In retrospect, having a double precision GPU might be advantageous if one were to assume that the BOINC automated graphics pinching function is able to see this opportunity and allow the screensaver more CPU time as a result. I will look into it.

It is also worth mentioning that the team is using the currently crunched data to form an N-Body simulation to representing the findings so far. The N-body simulation will also use distributed computing to calculate stream motions and will be run alongside the "separation" application. We appreciate all your help! The N-body project should be done in the next few months and it will have a screensaver of its own using the same screensaver infrastructure.

I should have a demo at least for Windows up by tomorrow. The Linux and Mac ports will be up shortly after. If things go well, I will begin releasing the modified main applications.

Profile banditwolf
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 295,133
RAC: 0
Message 41251 - Posted: 4 Aug 2010 | 2:08:40 UTC

The color looks much better the black and white. It helps to visualize the pictures better. I think the Milkyway could be toned down just a tad so it doesn't look as bright.
____________
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 41253 - Posted: 4 Aug 2010 | 2:52:59 UTC - in response to Message 41251.
Last modified: 2 Apr 2011 | 5:52:31 UTC

The color looks much better the black and white. It helps to visualize the pictures better. I think the Milkyway could be toned down just a tad so it doesn't look as bright.

-banditwolf

The brightness is touchy. I like to create a little over-brightness in the blue to maximize the contrast, but the tiniest amount over and resolution is lost since the Milky Way is relatively small compared to the wedge. On top of this, the effect of multiplying intensity changes over the thousands of stars used to draw the Milky Way leads to a relatively large difference resulting from a change of even 1 unit intensity per star. This problem could be overcome by a number of techniques, but I will try to solve by adjusting the view distance to simplify things for now. This should be a little better (changing the thread image as well). Original image here.




The demo that will be released allows interaction through the keyboard and screenshots (Prnt Scrn key on PC), so anyone that would like to can submit enhancement ideas. I look forward to seeing them!

Emanuel
Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 07
Posts: 280
Credit: 2,442,757
RAC: 486
Message 41268 - Posted: 4 Aug 2010 | 15:38:46 UTC - in response to Message 41253.
Last modified: 4 Aug 2010 | 15:41:00 UTC

Wow, it's so pretty - I don't suppose you could also release a dedicated standalone version? XD
Edit: oh, or do you already intend to? I should have read your last post more carefully.

Joses
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 8 Jul 09
Posts: 16
Credit: 231,304
RAC: 201
Message 41272 - Posted: 4 Aug 2010 | 18:15:52 UTC

Colour.

That is amazing, and I agree, it will likely add interested users just because you have an interesting "eye-candy" screen saver which more or less shows what milkyway is doing (in a pictorial sense - pictures are worth 1000 words).

____________
http://www.joescat.com/boinc/

rpurdy
Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 10
Posts: 1
Credit: 1,816,104
RAC: 2
Message 41280 - Posted: 5 Aug 2010 | 2:08:16 UTC

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. I am so glad to be living in these days when I can be part of something like this. Even if what I am adding to the whole is not significant right now, just being part of it is wonderful. I really dig where your are going with the screensaver. I vote for color.

Frankm
Send message
Joined: 17 Nov 08
Posts: 9
Credit: 7,350
RAC: 0
Message 41298 - Posted: 6 Aug 2010 | 10:46:49 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2010 | 11:16:06 UTC

The coloured version looks very nice!

One idea to speed up the screensaver:
It seems you try to display a lot of points (stars). I guess many of them will be verry close (at lest on the screen). Would it be possible to reduce the data to display by some kind of "abstraction" ? Maybe you can select only some representatives of the whole star dataset, based on distances to each other. Another idea would be to "merge" several stars together, and replace them by one star with an "averaged" position and brightness. What do you think?

About the ATI GPU version: I have a relatively fast ATI Mobile HD 5850 in my new laptop,
but it does not support double precision. Will there be a GPU app for single precision GPUs some day ??

Best regards,
Frank

Frankm
Send message
Joined: 17 Nov 08
Posts: 9
Credit: 7,350
RAC: 0
Message 41299 - Posted: 6 Aug 2010 | 11:11:19 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2010 | 11:13:53 UTC

Another idea to optimize the sceensaver:

Which part will be changed more often, the Milky Way, or the wedge?
The wedge on the preview screenshot basicially looks like a slice moving in 3D. Maybe you could use a 2D surface to render the wedge into, and then let OpenGL project the data onto the "slice" in 3D?
If the Milky Way will not change, you might get some speed back by "preparing" the data once, instead of colouring and transforming it for every screen update.

best regards,
Frank.

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 41303 - Posted: 6 Aug 2010 | 17:40:13 UTC - in response to Message 41268.
Last modified: 7 Aug 2010 | 6:23:03 UTC

"Wow, it's so pretty - I don't suppose you could also release a dedicated standalone version? XD
Edit: oh, or do you already intend to?"

-Emanuel

The standalone is used to test and design the screensaver routines very quickly and it is easily made available, so the demo being released could be called the standalone version.

"It seems you try to display a lot of points (stars). I guess many of them will be very close (at lest on the screen). Would it be possible to reduce the data to display by some kind of "abstraction" ? Maybe you can select only some representatives of the whole star dataset, based on distances to each other. Another idea would be to "merge" several stars together, and replace them by one star with an "averaged" position and brightness. What do you think?

- Frankm

Absolutely! I have been kicking this idea around since the start of the project, but there are a few issues. The stars could be cut up into sections and averaged by using an inverse tree. This is similar to what is done when rendering textures at further distances. This tends to create a flickering effect during the transition that I considered undesirable for the screensaver. It could be overcome completely by waiting until stars were less than an 8th of a pixel apart to use their average. This did not seem necessary for the screensaver as it is now, but this mehthod would be critical for a larger-scale application using millions of stars and a larger range of distances.

"About the ATI GPU version: I have a relatively fast ATI Mobile HD 5850 in my new laptop,
but it does not support double precision. Will there be a GPU app for single precision GPUs some day ??"

- Frankm

We are working on a way to do that for the N-Body computations. It is too early to say for sure at the moment, but one idea was to split up each double precision value needed into three or four floating point operations. It would be slower than direct float-based math, but potentially useful if it allowed full use of the GPU.

Edit: this idea would actually produce slower results than not using the GPU on closer inspection. Matt A. and Ben have told me that the N-body will rely on double-precision math as well. The screensaver could benefit from using single precision enhancements, but this would most likely be implemented in later versions.

"The wedge on the preview screenshot basicially looks like a slice moving in 3D. Maybe you could use a 2D surface to render the wedge into, and then let OpenGL project the data onto the "slice" in 3D?"

-Frankm

That is clever. I hadn't thought of it. It would produce flattening and make the wedge invisible from certain angles, but other angles could potentially get a boost in speed. The library already uses textures for the individual stars so it is hard to say how much faster it would be without testing. Open-GL might be able to accelerate the current star draws as well, but CPU code was chosen for maximum compatibility in this revision and also because there does not seem to be native GPU support for pixel-summing with textures. This might require GPU programming.

Matt Arsenault
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 8 May 10
Posts: 576
Credit: 15,704,253
RAC: 0
Message 41304 - Posted: 6 Aug 2010 | 20:32:58 UTC - in response to Message 41298.


About the ATI GPU version: I have a relatively fast ATI Mobile HD 5850 in my new laptop,
but it does not support double precision. Will there be a GPU app for single precision GPUs some day ??


I think that card should support doubles. Nearly all of the 5xxx series do, except randomly a couple don't.

ztmike
Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 447,355
RAC: 0
Message 41310 - Posted: 7 Aug 2010 | 3:57:40 UTC

I have a question that didn't hit me till now..

Most screensavers for BOINC projects only keep showing till the current WU is finished ..then the screensaver goes away when the new WU starts crunching..what will happen if a GPU user opens up the screensaver being that it only takes me about 1:14mins to complete 1 WU?

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 41311 - Posted: 7 Aug 2010 | 4:44:27 UTC - in response to Message 41310.
Last modified: 7 Aug 2010 | 6:24:24 UTC

Most screensavers for BOINC projects only keep showing till the current WU is finished ..then the screensaver goes away when the new WU starts crunching..what will happen if a GPU user opens up the screensaver being that it only takes me about 1:14mins to complete 1 WU?

-ztmike

That's interesting. BOINC controls screensaver activation and resource use. It may automatically terminate a screensaver under certain circumstances. If it does terminate the screensaver early, it is something I could discuss it with the BOINC team since it would be highly undesirable. I would consider it a bug. Please feel free to let me know if this happens after the initial release.

Frankm
Send message
Joined: 17 Nov 08
Posts: 9
Credit: 7,350
RAC: 0
Message 41328 - Posted: 8 Aug 2010 | 16:28:36 UTC - in response to Message 41303.
Last modified: 8 Aug 2010 | 16:32:55 UTC

Maybe it would help to look at the "abstraction" problem from the astrophysics point of view? You could merge stars based on their distance and mass/brightness once, and then use this abstracted dataset for the screensaver. If you are already looking at N-Body simulations, you could possibly re-use a spatial tree representation (like a barnes-hutt octtree); the end nodes of such a tree could be candidates for merging. Would it be possible to allow the user to control the amount of abstraction?

best regards,
Frank


"It seems you try to display a lot of points (stars). I guess many of them will be very close (at lest on the screen). Would it be possible to reduce the data to display by some kind of "abstraction" ? Maybe you can select only some representatives of the whole star dataset, based on distances to each other. Another idea would be to "merge" several stars together, and replace them by one star with an "averaged" position and brightness. What do you think?"
- Frankm

Absolutely! I have been kicking this idea around since the start of the project, but there are a few issues. The stars could be cut up into sections and averaged by using an inverse tree. This is similar to what is done when rendering textures at further distances. This tends to create a flickering effect during the transition that I considered undesirable for the screensaver. It could be overcome completely by waiting until stars were less than an 8th of a pixel apart to use their average. This did not seem necessary for the screensaver as it is now, but this mehthod would be critical for a larger-scale application using millions of stars and a larger range of distances.
- Shane Reilly

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 41330 - Posted: 8 Aug 2010 | 19:19:40 UTC - in response to Message 41328.
Last modified: 8 Aug 2010 | 19:23:28 UTC

"Maybe it would help to look at the "abstraction" problem from the astrophysics point of view? You could merge stars based on their distance and mass/brightness once, and then use this abstracted dataset for the screensaver. If you are already looking at N-Body simulations, you could possibly re-use a spatial tree representation (like a barnes-hutt octtree); the end nodes of such a tree could be candidates for merging. Would it be possible to allow the user to control the amount of abstraction?"

-Frank

That is an interesting idea, and a commonly used one for physics approximations. Some physics team members of the MilkyWay@Home team suggested as you did to merge stars, while the computer science members tended to suggested skipping stars (I had the same idea). I tried skipping stars, however it became impossible to see the density distributions without increasing the size of the blurs. Losing the over-densities is undesirable since the point of the separation research is to match them to the stream. Increasing the size of the blurs creates similar overhead and makes things look "fuzzy" as one user pointed out which many people have indicated is also undesirable.

User control is simple to implement for any features you would like to recommend, either through an 'ini' file or through the use of function keys.

Profile KWSN Checklist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 08
Posts: 130
Credit: 203,351,125
RAC: 726
Message 41334 - Posted: 9 Aug 2010 | 0:46:14 UTC

An other vote for color.
____________

Frankm
Send message
Joined: 17 Nov 08
Posts: 9
Credit: 7,350
RAC: 0
Message 41338 - Posted: 9 Aug 2010 | 9:13:04 UTC - in response to Message 41304.


I think that card [ATI 5850] should support doubles. Nearly all of the 5xxx series do, except randomly a couple don't.
-- Matt


I just looked up the specs on the ATI website. It seems that most of the newer cards support doubles, except for the Mobility cards.
In a knowledge base article (http://developer.amd.com/support/KnowledgeBase/Lists/KnowledgeBase/DispForm.aspx?ID=88) they state that only the Mobility Radeon HD 4800 Series supports doubles.

Mobility Radeon HD 5850:
# TDP: 30-39 Watts (GDDR5) or 31 Watts (GDDR3/DDR3)
# Engine clock speed: 500-625 MHz
# Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/sec (GDDR5) or 28.8 GB/sec (GDDR3/DDR3)
# Polygon throughput: 500-625M polygons/sec
# Processing power (single precision): 0.8-1.0 TeraFLOPS
(and no double precision...)

Radeon HD 5850:
# Maximum board power: 151 Watts; Idle board power: 27 Watts
# Engine clock speed: 725 MHz
# Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/sec
# Polygon throughput: 725M polygons/sec
# Processing power (single precision): 2.09 TeraFLOPS
# Processing power (double precision): 418 GigaFLOPS

Brian Priebe
Send message
Joined: 27 Nov 09
Posts: 98
Credit: 172,304,775
RAC: 80,010
Message 41411 - Posted: 12 Aug 2010 | 9:55:57 UTC - in response to Message 41338.

...they state that only the Mobility Radeon HD 4800 Series supports doubles.
Yet they claim 128-bit precision on all operations on, say, the 530V line. Why bother?

uBronan
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Feb 09
Posts: 166
Credit: 27,520,813
RAC: 0
Message 41425 - Posted: 13 Aug 2010 | 15:02:34 UTC
Last modified: 13 Aug 2010 | 15:25:12 UTC

First on topic another vote for color

now offtopic: ofcourse not many mobility videocards support double precision..
the whole purpose of these cards is trying to give a good output with minimal heat and power draw ...
lol what you think double precision do ;), mw is a super way to heat up your videocard and if its a laptop get it to shutdown because gets overheated xD
All normal HD 5850 support double precision only the lower models seem to lack this but its sometimes hard to find if they support it or not
I think the rule in this case is when they not mention it on the specs it probably is not implemented
____________
Its new, its relative fast... my new bicycle

ztmike
Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 09
Posts: 45
Credit: 447,355
RAC: 0
Message 42154 - Posted: 15 Sep 2010 | 3:52:00 UTC

I see its been 32 days since last reply..any updates on the screensaver release?

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 42351 - Posted: 24 Sep 2010 | 19:02:13 UTC - in response to Message 42154.
Last modified: 24 Sep 2010 | 20:04:21 UTC

I am back on the project after being unexpectedly pulled away on personal business for some time. Demos will be released in the next few weeks. Testing is needed for all platforms before the first release.

If you would like to test a quick demo to see if the application will run on your machine, feel free to try this and post your results (and specs if applicable):

http://www.rpi.edu/~reills2/mwdemo/ (Windows - all versions)

Usage:

< / > - Move in / out
F1-F9 - Change speed
Arrow - look around
Ctrl-arrow - spin view
Shift-arrow - rotate object
Tab - Start over

You should see a blue blinking cube for the test.

Profile Beezlebub
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 07
Posts: 18
Credit: 38,429,435
RAC: 0
Message 42358 - Posted: 25 Sep 2010 | 3:28:15 UTC - in response to Message 42351.

I see multiple blue dots in almost all views but none look like a cube.


Intel q6600 quad, Asus p5k deluxe, 3 gig ddr ram, 4850 ATI video.
____________
"There is no limit to the amount of good a
person can do if they do not care who gets credit for it."


Emanuel
Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 07
Posts: 280
Credit: 2,442,757
RAC: 486
Message 42433 - Posted: 28 Sep 2010 | 19:37:31 UTC
Last modified: 28 Sep 2010 | 19:38:28 UTC

Indeed, lots of pretty blue bubbly things fading in and out. They sort of form a cube together, but not really. I also managed to break it at some point - pressed > and everything went black aside from the axes at the top.

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 42438 - Posted: 29 Sep 2010 | 0:00:14 UTC - in response to Message 42433.
Last modified: 2 Apr 2011 | 5:53:41 UTC

Thank you for the feedback. I would be especially interested in computers that do not show anything, but feel free to comment on working runs as well. You can press <tab> to get back to the start. If the speed is turned up too high (e.g. <F9>) it will zoom out so fast that nothing will be visible in a single frame. I do not expect the application will crash although using axes still has a couple bugs as you zoom in very close. Whether or not keyboard inputs and screen updates work is the main focus. The object is not literally a cube of course. It is an arrangement of glowing blurry stars in a cube formation.

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 42443 - Posted: 29 Sep 2010 | 8:21:20 UTC
Last modified: 2 Apr 2011 | 5:54:46 UTC

Here are two new versions of the test in a zip file. Just extract the file to your desktop (or anywhere else you prefer) and run the two application files. Both files are the same program, but one runs in full-screen mode. If "cube_test.exe" runs on your machine, try the full screen version. As a precaution, it may be wise to close other applications and save work before running the full-screen test.

For those that are not running Windows XP or later, downloading an application such as 7-zip or WinZip will allow you to extract zip files.

cube_test_win.zip

Usage:

< / > - Move in / out
F1-F9 - Change speed
Arrow - look around
Ctrl-arrow - spin view
Shift-arrow - rotate object
Tab - Start over
Backspace - focus on center of cube

Edit: Space to stop motion

Yous should see an arrangement of glowing blurry stars in a cube formation as you zoom out. Speed <F5> is recommended for this.

Please post results of the test and specs if the applications did not run properly if you would like to contribute to the screensaver testing. Tests with the stand-galaxy simulation will also be available soon.

Emanuel
Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 07
Posts: 280
Credit: 2,442,757
RAC: 486
Message 42449 - Posted: 29 Sep 2010 | 15:15:04 UTC - in response to Message 42443.
Last modified: 29 Sep 2010 | 15:20:54 UTC

Wow, it's so psychedelic. Took me a while to figure out how to get it to work. The F keys only take effect once you actually press > or <, and once they do you can't stop it, only go faster or slower and switch between zooming in and out. F5 is a bit too fast for me, I'd recommend F4 (is this dependent on the speed of your PC?). It sort of ends up like an angry white blob - is that intended? The blue edges seem to be divided into two bands instead of a smooth transition, but maybe that's just how it works.

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 42458 - Posted: 30 Sep 2010 | 5:17:41 UTC - in response to Message 42449.

I have added a note that the spacebar will stop the camera motion. Thank you for pointing that out.

Profile Beezlebub
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Nov 07
Posts: 18
Credit: 38,429,435
RAC: 0
Message 42475 - Posted: 30 Sep 2010 | 18:39:37 UTC
Last modified: 30 Sep 2010 | 18:53:31 UTC

Ok got to the cube but my in out controls are < (out) > (in)

Out meaning the cube gets smaller or further away and in means the cube goes to individual dots.

Also the arrows move the cube opposite the arrow,,,,,,






____________
"There is no limit to the amount of good a
person can do if they do not care who gets credit for it."


Profile Werkstatt
Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 08
Posts: 297
Credit: 105,742,273
RAC: 76
Message 42699 - Posted: 9 Oct 2010 | 7:35:00 UTC

Sorry, my in/out controls </> do not work. Maybe because of german keyboard layout?

Shane Reilly
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 2 May 10
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,138
RAC: 0
Message 42893 - Posted: 16 Oct 2010 | 17:25:08 UTC - in response to Message 42699.
Last modified: 16 Oct 2010 | 17:26:52 UTC

Someone else had a similar problem. Solution here.

Post to thread

Message boards : News : Screensaver Demo


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2013 AstroInformatics Group