Is MW going to be a GPU project now?
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Is MW going to be a GPU project now?

Author Message
Profile banditwolf
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 295,133
RAC: 0
Message 47952 - Posted: 17 Apr 2011 | 12:11:30 UTC

Without using an opti app Cpu performance and credits are poor. Is there any plans to put out better cpu apps?
____________
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.

Profile Crunch3r
Volunteer developer
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 08
Posts: 358
Credit: 256,958,638
RAC: 2,467
Message 48172 - Posted: 23 Apr 2011 | 23:34:26 UTC - in response to Message 47952.
Last modified: 23 Apr 2011 | 23:40:05 UTC

Without using an opti app Cpu performance and credits are poor. Is there any plans to put out better cpu apps?


I know that the stock app is pretty much unusable on a CPU.
FWIW, it seems that i can reduce crunching times to less than ~5h on a XEON(5365@3 Ghz, core 2 based)...

Anyway, i do know that that's far away from what the previous opt app did...

I'd be interested to know some crunch times on different CPUs with the stock app (cpu:time:credits), before using a LUT for the INT EXP part...
(wich i know for a fact that the previous optimized CPU app used and i allready suggested to Matt for the GPU BUT it'll greatly speed up the stock CPU app as well)
____________

Join BOINC United now!

Magister
Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 07
Posts: 8
Credit: 2,873,855
RAC: 0
Message 48273 - Posted: 27 Apr 2011 | 15:05:24 UTC - in response to Message 48172.

On a Quad XEON I had a RAC of about 4800 to 5000 credit/day with the old 0.21SSE3 optimized app. Now with the standard 0.50SSE2 it went down to about 800 credit/day.

A unit takes more than 12 hours to complete now, before it was something like 4h30 IIRC.

Chris S
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 08
Posts: 1357
Credit: 173,075,472
RAC: 6
Message 48277 - Posted: 27 Apr 2011 | 15:39:42 UTC

If people are looking for credit then there is no point hanging around here any more, that is quite clear. Those of us interested in the science will be the only ones to stay. A shame because it was a good payer for quite a while, but I guess that nothing good lasts forever.

Now that DNETC has disappeared as well, I see no point in investing in any more ATI cards which I was thinking of doing, so I shall be saving my money for something else more rewarding, perhaps a decent holiday instead.

Even NCI stuff like Freehal has died, and I'm beginning to think that 2011 is heralding a barren time for Boinc in general.
____________
Don't drink water, that's the stuff that rusts pipes

Profile banditwolf
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 295,133
RAC: 0
Message 48278 - Posted: 27 Apr 2011 | 15:59:33 UTC

From looking at it for either credit, science or both it doesn't seem as worth it now. When the same task is much longer for the same science & credit it doesn't make sense to me.
____________
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.

Chris S
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 08
Posts: 1357
Credit: 173,075,472
RAC: 6
Message 48281 - Posted: 27 Apr 2011 | 18:38:39 UTC

I still think that the science is worth it, even if it now does take longer than it did, for less credit. I will be sticking around, but I can't pretend that I'm not disappointed.

____________
Don't drink water, that's the stuff that rusts pipes

Matt Arsenault
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 8 May 10
Posts: 576
Credit: 15,704,253
RAC: 0
Message 48282 - Posted: 27 Apr 2011 | 18:39:25 UTC - in response to Message 47952.

The next CPU release will be faster for most people

Profile Beyond
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 383
Credit: 501,817,389
RAC: 3
Message 48285 - Posted: 27 Apr 2011 | 19:26:49 UTC - in response to Message 48277.

If people are looking for credit then there is no point hanging around here any more, that is quite clear. Those of us interested in the science will be the only ones to stay.

Now that DNETC has disappeared as well, I see no point in investing in any more ATI cards which I was thinking of doing,

So you're really not interested in the science? JK, hopefully the credit levels will return. I know the whole credit issue mystifies the MW team, but they have to realize that DC BOINC has become a game/hobby/competition for many. No different than any other completion of which us humans are so fond. The added bonus is that we get to help science.

Chris S
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 08
Posts: 1357
Credit: 173,075,472
RAC: 6
Message 48307 - Posted: 28 Apr 2011 | 10:35:59 UTC

So you're really not interested in the science?

Yes I am, which is why I said I would be sticking around :-)

JK, hopefully the credit levels will return.

It would be nice to think so.

I know the whole credit issue mystifies the MW team, but they have to realize that DC BOINC has become a game/hobby/competition for many. No different than any other competition of which us humans are so fond. The added bonus is that we get to help science.

Happy to agree, but don't hold your breath ...
____________
Don't drink water, that's the stuff that rusts pipes

Magister
Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 07
Posts: 8
Credit: 2,873,855
RAC: 0
Message 48322 - Posted: 28 Apr 2011 | 14:13:39 UTC
Last modified: 28 Apr 2011 | 14:14:59 UTC

I don't do it for credit, I run Seti for 11 years now and since boinc exists I run seti/einstein/lhc/milkyway only. It's just dissapointing that milkyway credits went down like this, but I still run it.

Profile Crunch3r
Volunteer developer
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 08
Posts: 358
Credit: 256,958,638
RAC: 2,467
Message 48331 - Posted: 28 Apr 2011 | 19:40:36 UTC - in response to Message 48282.
Last modified: 28 Apr 2011 | 19:43:36 UTC

The next CPU release will be faster for most people


Yes, quite a bit faster than the 0.50sse2 app.

My Xeon needs ~ 8800 sec. for a 213 credit WU (13_3s_fix20)(Intel compiler). Depending on the compiler used for the stock app, it should be ~ 10k sec(or less).

Not bad for the first try.
____________

Join BOINC United now!

Profile banditwolf
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 295,133
RAC: 0
Message 48336 - Posted: 29 Apr 2011 | 0:31:43 UTC

Thanks for the work Crunch3r.
____________
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.

Magister
Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 07
Posts: 8
Credit: 2,873,855
RAC: 0
Message 48342 - Posted: 29 Apr 2011 | 17:13:48 UTC - in response to Message 48336.

yup, thanks Crunch3r! and if you need a beta tester for your optimized CPU app... ;-)

JLConawayII
Send message
Joined: 27 Apr 10
Posts: 30
Credit: 81,088,603
RAC: 27,766
Message 48617 - Posted: 8 May 2011 | 22:22:31 UTC

Are you crying? THERE'S NO CRYING IN SCIENCE!! Suck it up kids, science isn't all sunshine and blueberry pancakes.

Profile Travis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 1976
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
Message 48628 - Posted: 9 May 2011 | 12:05:12 UTC - in response to Message 48172.

Without using an opti app Cpu performance and credits are poor. Is there any plans to put out better cpu apps?


I know that the stock app is pretty much unusable on a CPU.
FWIW, it seems that i can reduce crunching times to less than ~5h on a XEON(5365@3 Ghz, core 2 based)...

Anyway, i do know that that's far away from what the previous opt app did...

I'd be interested to know some crunch times on different CPUs with the stock app (cpu:time:credits), before using a LUT for the INT EXP part...
(wich i know for a fact that the previous optimized CPU app used and i allready suggested to Matt for the GPU BUT it'll greatly speed up the stock CPU app as well)


Is this from using compilation flags, or changing the code?

If any of the changes are things we can do on our end, we'd be more than happy to implement them.
____________

Profile Crunch3r
Volunteer developer
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 08
Posts: 358
Credit: 256,958,638
RAC: 2,467
Message 48635 - Posted: 9 May 2011 | 15:02:51 UTC - in response to Message 48628.

Without using an opti app Cpu performance and credits are poor. Is there any plans to put out better cpu apps?


I know that the stock app is pretty much unusable on a CPU.
FWIW, it seems that i can reduce crunching times to less than ~5h on a XEON(5365@3 Ghz, core 2 based)...

Anyway, i do know that that's far away from what the previous opt app did...

I'd be interested to know some crunch times on different CPUs with the stock app (cpu:time:credits), before using a LUT for the INT EXP part...
(wich i know for a fact that the previous optimized CPU app used and i allready suggested to Matt for the GPU BUT it'll greatly speed up the stock CPU app as well)


Is this from using compilation flags, or changing the code?

If any of the changes are things we can do on our end, we'd be more than happy to implement them.


Code changes. I've given Matt some hand vectorized code (SSE2/SSE3) but there's still work to be done on that.

____________

Join BOINC United now!

Profile banditwolf
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 295,133
RAC: 0
Message 48921 - Posted: 22 May 2011 | 17:13:55 UTC

Any update on the opti app?
____________
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.

Matt Arsenault
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 8 May 10
Posts: 576
Credit: 15,704,253
RAC: 0
Message 48923 - Posted: 22 May 2011 | 18:44:18 UTC - in response to Message 48921.

Any update on the opti app?
I'm planning on a release for the first week in June.

europa
Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 10
Posts: 64
Credit: 23,997,496
RAC: 8,500
Message 48955 - Posted: 24 May 2011 | 21:21:22 UTC - in response to Message 48923.

Matt,

Would it be possible to also issue a stock app_info.xml for MW@Home? It might eliminate some problems, especially for those of us who are not programmers, as well as helping with any troubleshooting by getting everyone on the same sheet of music.

Regards,
Steve

P.S. I'm on Ubuntu 11.04.................the rest of the world will have to look out for itself!! :)

Profile Sean Arrowsmith
Send message
Joined: 30 Mar 09
Posts: 15
Credit: 12,525,302
RAC: 4,532
Message 49027 - Posted: 26 May 2011 | 9:43:25 UTC

That will be great to get a decent CPU app, not run a single MW WU since my PC upgrades to GTX460's coincided with the project upgrade and the Nvidia opti apps disappeared.

Sunny129
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Jan 11
Posts: 249
Credit: 165,996,315
RAC: 528,612
Message 49043 - Posted: 26 May 2011 | 14:13:49 UTC

does this thread strictly pertain to an optimized app for de_separation tasks, or does it include n-body tasks as well?



I don't do it for credit, I run Seti for 11 years now and since boinc exists I run seti/einstein/lhc/milkyway only.

cool, i strictly participate in those 4 projects as well...though i'll probably join Muon1 DPAD (a non-BIONC project) when i get around to reallocating my resources.
____________

Profile Beyond
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 383
Credit: 501,817,389
RAC: 3
Message 49044 - Posted: 26 May 2011 | 14:37:30 UTC - in response to Message 49043.

i'll probably join Muon1 DPAD (a non-BIONC project) when i get around to reallocating my resources.

You can also do Muon1 through Yoyo if you like.

Matt Arsenault
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 8 May 10
Posts: 576
Credit: 15,704,253
RAC: 0
Message 49052 - Posted: 26 May 2011 | 16:03:39 UTC - in response to Message 48955.

Would it be possible to also issue a stock app_info.xml for MW@Home? It might eliminate some problems, especially for those of us who are not programmers, as well as helping with any troubleshooting by getting everyone on the same sheet of music.
Not sure what you mean by stock app_info. The point is it kind of isn't. Do you mean a template or something?

Sunny129
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Jan 11
Posts: 249
Credit: 165,996,315
RAC: 528,612
Message 49054 - Posted: 26 May 2011 | 16:10:17 UTC - in response to Message 49044.

You can also do Muon1 through Yoyo if you like.

thanks for the suggestion. unfortunately i can't run Muon1 through Yoyo@Home without competing against my team (TeAm AnandTech). so i'll have to run the standalone version when i eventually get into it.
____________

Profile Werkstatt
Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 08
Posts: 297
Credit: 105,742,273
RAC: 76
Message 49059 - Posted: 26 May 2011 | 17:24:35 UTC - in response to Message 49052.

Would it be possible to also issue a stock app_info.xml for MW@Home? It might eliminate some problems, especially for those of us who are not programmers, as well as helping with any troubleshooting by getting everyone on the same sheet of music.
Not sure what you mean by stock app_info. The point is it kind of isn't. Do you mean a template or something?


Hi Matt,

what all GPU-Crunchers want to have is a app_info.xml.
Nobody wants to crunch de_separations on CPU if a GPU is available, but disable the CPU disables also the nbodys. So you need some way to make that decision. Using different settings for home/scool/work will not help in every possible situation; other guys want to crunch two wu's at the same time (during calculation of the likelyhood the GPU is in IDLE), so the best solution is using an app_info.

But it's not easy to compile a good working app_info. You need al lot of numbers, there are a lot of possible arguments also. This is why peaple want a app_info, which gives them the ability to decide, which type they want to crunch.

There is another easy way to solve most people's problem.
Add a checkbox to the personal settings 'Run CPU-Apps if GPU-Apps are available?'
This enables the crunchers to set 'Use CPU' to on, getting nbody CPU and de_separations GPU wu's only. And there is no need to update the app_info if the version changes.

Alexander

europa
Send message
Joined: 29 Oct 10
Posts: 64
Credit: 23,997,496
RAC: 8,500
Message 49064 - Posted: 26 May 2011 | 22:25:28 UTC - in response to Message 49052.

At any given point in time, MW has a number of computational campaigns underway,each with its own app. Some benefit from the GPUs, some don't.

I'm not a programmer. I don't know the syntax or information required for an app_info.xml.

Basically, since I have two machines, each with dual Fermis, and 16GB of DDR3 RAM and both AMD HexCore machines, I'd like to be able to run at least two WU's simultaneously on each card to more fully use them. Why tie up the machines on CPU WU's when GPU WU's are available? And why run just one WU at a time when the Fermi's can handle multiple simultaneous WU's depending on the cards GRAM?

If the MW programmers could provide an approved app_info.xml based on whatever the computational apps are, then the user would be able to use their machines more efficiently. Also, if there was a problem, you'd know it wasn't the app_info.xml.

Thanks,
Steve

Profile banditwolf
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 295,133
RAC: 0
Message 49173 - Posted: 7 Jun 2011 | 18:46:27 UTC - in response to Message 48923.

Any update on the opti app?
I'm planning on a release for the first week in June.


Any news yet? Having it before the double credit would be nice.
____________
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected?
If it makes sense, DON'T do it.

Matt Arsenault
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 8 May 10
Posts: 576
Credit: 15,704,253
RAC: 0
Message 49178 - Posted: 7 Jun 2011 | 23:54:38 UTC - in response to Message 49173.

Any update on the opti app?
I'm planning on a release for the first week in June.


Any news yet? Having it before the double credit would be nice.
Working on it. The outage made it kind of hard to test anything.

Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Is MW going to be a GPU project now?


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2013 AstroInformatics Group