Welcome to MilkyWay@home

Nvidia Geforce GTX 650 Ti slower than GTX 285 ?

Message boards : Number crunching : Nvidia Geforce GTX 650 Ti slower than GTX 285 ?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Daniel

Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 07
Posts: 7
Credit: 74,562,626
RAC: 0
Message 56488 - Posted: 14 Dec 2012, 9:30:39 UTC

I have just bought a new PC with an NVidia GeForce GTX650 Ti video card.

I have an older PC with an NVidia GeForce GTX285 video card.

BOINC Manager reports the GFlops Peak value as 1586 for the GTX650 Ti and 1063 for the GTX285.

I have averaged the run times for the last 10 workunits for each card ...
GTX650 Ti - 24.7 minutes
GTX285 - 17.7 minutes

Does anyone have any ideas why the GTX650 Ti is taking longer to finish workunits than the GTX285 ?

I thought it should be faster.

ID: 56488 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 May 09
Posts: 3319
Credit: 520,314,784
RAC: 20,742
Message 56490 - Posted: 14 Dec 2012, 12:15:26 UTC - in response to Message 56488.  

I have just bought a new PC with an NVidia GeForce GTX650 Ti video card.

I have an older PC with an NVidia GeForce GTX285 video card.

BOINC Manager reports the GFlops Peak value as 1586 for the GTX650 Ti and 1063 for the GTX285.

I have averaged the run times for the last 10 workunits for each card ...
GTX650 Ti - 24.7 minutes
GTX285 - 17.7 minutes

Does anyone have any ideas why the GTX650 Ti is taking longer to finish workunits than the GTX285 ?

I thought it should be faster.


If you unhide your pc's we can look at what else is different to see if we can help figure it out.
ID: 56490 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Daniel

Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 07
Posts: 7
Credit: 74,562,626
RAC: 0
Message 56492 - Posted: 14 Dec 2012, 12:47:08 UTC - in response to Message 56490.  

Hi Mikey,

I've unhidden my PCs.

Daniel.
ID: 56492 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile dskagcommunity
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Feb 11
Posts: 170
Credit: 205,557,553
RAC: 0
Message 56497 - Posted: 14 Dec 2012, 18:02:59 UTC

6xx cards has a horrible DP Performance to get user to buy there tesla cards..
DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at



ID: 56497 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
JHMarshall

Send message
Joined: 24 Jul 12
Posts: 40
Credit: 7,123,301,054
RAC: 0
Message 56500 - Posted: 14 Dec 2012, 19:28:44 UTC - in response to Message 56488.  

I have just bought a new PC with an NVidia GeForce GTX650 Ti video card.

I have averaged the run times for the last 10 workunits for each card ...
GTX650 Ti - 24.7 minutes
GTX285 - 17.7 minutes

Does anyone have any ideas why the GTX650 Ti is taking longer to finish workunits than the GTX285 ?

I thought it should be faster.



The GFLOPS reported by BOINC is the single precision performance. You would see the 650 Ti faster on single precision projects such as Einstein. The DP performance on these cards is not so good. However the power requirements of the 650 Ti is considerably less than the 285. So even though the 650 Ti takes longer you are getting more performance per watt.

Joe
ID: 56500 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Daniel

Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 07
Posts: 7
Credit: 74,562,626
RAC: 0
Message 56506 - Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 2:31:35 UTC - in response to Message 56500.  

Thanks for your replies.

This explains what's going on.

Does anyone know if there is a website that lists the double precision performance of different graphics cards ?

It would be nice to know the DP performance of different cards so that next time I buy one I can pick one with better performance.

Best Regards,
Daniel
ID: 56506 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Daniel

Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 07
Posts: 7
Credit: 74,562,626
RAC: 0
Message 56508 - Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 4:44:48 UTC - in response to Message 56506.  

I've found the DP performance of the Radeon cards on the AMD website and I've found the DP performance of the Tesla cards on the Nvidia website, but so far I haven't found any figures for the Geforce cards.
ID: 56508 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
JHMarshall

Send message
Joined: 24 Jul 12
Posts: 40
Credit: 7,123,301,054
RAC: 0
Message 56509 - Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 5:02:09 UTC - in response to Message 56508.  

Try these

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units


ID: 56509 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Daniel

Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 07
Posts: 7
Credit: 74,562,626
RAC: 0
Message 56510 - Posted: 15 Dec 2012, 5:24:27 UTC - in response to Message 56509.  

I've looked at these pages already but I can't see where it mentions a Double Precision GFlops value for the Geforce cards.

I can only see Gflops or Gflops (FMA) and the GTX650 Ti has a higher number than the GTX285, so I think these must not be referring to the DP value.
ID: 56510 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
JHMarshall

Send message
Joined: 24 Jul 12
Posts: 40
Credit: 7,123,301,054
RAC: 0
Message 56539 - Posted: 16 Dec 2012, 23:22:44 UTC - in response to Message 56510.  

Sorry, I've been on vacation. The double precision throughput of the NVidia 6xx series cards is 1/24 x the single precision.

You can see from the AMD tables on the 79xx series that they are 1/4 x single precision. This is why the AMD cards are much faster in DP. In single precision the NVidia cards and AMD cards are closely equivalent for the dollar, but in DP the AMD cards can be 6 times faster.

NVidia wants you to buy Tesla cards for several thousand dollars, but even these don't complete well on a cost basis with the AMD cards in DP. However, the Tesla cards do have lots of error checking and corrections built-in that make them more reliable for critical computations. These projects handle the reliability problems by sending out work units to multiple machines to verify results.

Joe
ID: 56539 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Daniel

Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 07
Posts: 7
Credit: 74,562,626
RAC: 0
Message 56543 - Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 6:18:13 UTC - in response to Message 56539.  

Thanks Joe, it all makes sense now.

I've just read that for the GTX285 the DP performance is only 1/12 that of the SP performance, this would explain why it is faster than the GTX650 Ti even though it has a slower SP performance.

I think I'll buy an AMD card next time.

Best Regards,
Daniel
ID: 56543 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 May 09
Posts: 3319
Credit: 520,314,784
RAC: 20,742
Message 56545 - Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 12:55:09 UTC - in response to Message 56543.  
Last modified: 17 Dec 2012, 12:57:19 UTC

Thanks Joe, it all makes sense now.

I've just read that for the GTX285 the DP performance is only 1/12 that of the SP performance, this would explain why it is faster than the GTX650 Ti even though it has a slower SP performance.

I think I'll buy an AMD card next time.

Best Regards,
Daniel


Other projects, like DistRTgen and PrimeGrid, LOVE the Nvidia cards MUCH more!! There are still other projects, that like this one but SP projects, love the AMD cards more. Unfortunately there is no 'one card fits all' for all the possible gpu projects.
ID: 56545 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
JHMarshall

Send message
Joined: 24 Jul 12
Posts: 40
Credit: 7,123,301,054
RAC: 0
Message 56554 - Posted: 17 Dec 2012, 16:13:04 UTC - in response to Message 56545.  

Thanks Joe, it all makes sense now.

I've just read that for the GTX285 the DP performance is only 1/12 that of the SP performance, this would explain why it is faster than the GTX650 Ti even though it has a slower SP performance.

I think I'll buy an AMD card next time.

Best Regards,
Daniel


Other projects, like DistRTgen and PrimeGrid, LOVE the Nvidia cards MUCH more!! There are still other projects, that like this one but SP projects, love the AMD cards more. Unfortunately there is no 'one card fits all' for all the possible gpu projects.


Right, that's why I run both types. Most of the time my Nvidia card runs Einstein, GPUGrid, or PrimeGrid. I move it to MW mostly for challenges. The AMD cards are king on MW because of the DP requirement. They also do well on Einstein (SP) which has a very good OpenCL app for AMD.

Joe
ID: 56554 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 May 09
Posts: 3319
Credit: 520,314,784
RAC: 20,742
Message 56559 - Posted: 18 Dec 2012, 12:07:12 UTC - in response to Message 56554.  

Thanks Joe, it all makes sense now.

I've just read that for the GTX285 the DP performance is only 1/12 that of the SP performance, this would explain why it is faster than the GTX650 Ti even though it has a slower SP performance.

I think I'll buy an AMD card next time.

Best Regards,
Daniel


Other projects, like DistRTgen and PrimeGrid, LOVE the Nvidia cards MUCH more!! There are still other projects, that like this one but SP projects, love the AMD cards more. Unfortunately there is no 'one card fits all' for all the possible gpu projects.


Right, that's why I run both types. Most of the time my Nvidia card runs Einstein, GPUGrid, or PrimeGrid. I move it to MW mostly for challenges. The AMD cards are king on MW because of the DP requirement. They also do well on Einstein (SP) which has a very good OpenCL app for AMD.

Joe


Nvidia cards also do VERY well at DistrRTgen!!! If you are into points that is where ALL the top crunchers are.
ID: 56559 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Nvidia Geforce GTX 650 Ti slower than GTX 285 ?

©2024 Astroinformatics Group