New Runs

Author	Message
Jake Weiss Volunteer moderator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 25 Feb 13 Posts: 484 Credit: 15,416,978 RAC: 122,881	Message 67291 - Posted: 2 Apr 2018, 15:59:07 UTC
	Hey Everyone, I just put up 14 new runs. These are de_modfit_XX_bundle5_NoContraintsWithDisk_1 where XX runs from 09 to 23. Each of these is using a different parameter and star file so its very possible that there was some human error on my part putting them up. They were all tested beforehand but if you see any issues, please let me know with the name of the run that's giving you trouble. Some of these runs have some extra calculations due to the run requirements so their runtimes will vary slightly. The credits should scale accordingly. Jake
	ID: 67291 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Turbo Ralf Send message Joined: 13 Sep 16 Posts: 3 Credit: 35,764,220 RAC: 596,255	Message 67318 - Posted: 9 Apr 2018, 13:12:51 UTC
	Hi Jake, why is your server down so many times?
	ID: 67318 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

mikey Send message Joined: 8 May 09 Posts: 2137 Credit: 197,678,582 RAC: 170,640	Message 67320 - Posted: 9 Apr 2018, 16:58:00 UTC - in response to Message 67318.
	Hi Jake, why is your server down so many times? He has said in the past it was the normal backup processes etc that put a strain on the system resources and cause the whole thing to crash. He tried putting in a 2nd cpu core in the last week or so but something was damaged and it didn't work and they are now reviewing their options.
	ID: 67320 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Nicklw Send message Joined: 16 Aug 09 Posts: 9 Credit: 20,423,741 RAC: 23,615	Message 67337 - Posted: 16 Apr 2018, 2:13:35 UTC
	Hello Jake and others, I have been with Milkyway for quite a while now and everything has been basically OK but over the last six or seven months the WU's I'm getting that run on 3 CPU's have been slowing down and stopping with the time remaining just adding up, pausing them for half an hour or so helps with most but not all, when you changed the work unit priority to 1 from 0 everything went well then when you changed back it all went haywire again. Can anyone offer advice on this?????
	ID: 67337 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Jake Weiss Volunteer moderator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 25 Feb 13 Posts: 484 Credit: 15,416,978 RAC: 122,881	Message 67338 - Posted: 16 Apr 2018, 18:42:08 UTC
	Hey Nicklw, Can you tell me if these are N-body or Separation runs? If you copy the name of on the troublesome workunits and post that here, I will better be able to assist you. Jake
	ID: 67338 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Nicklw Send message Joined: 16 Aug 09 Posts: 9 Credit: 20,423,741 RAC: 23,615	Message 67342 - Posted: 17 Apr 2018, 9:17:38 UTC - in response to Message 67338.
	Hi Jake, thanks for getting back to me, basically they are nbodies for example (and each of these are off two of my computers) de_nbody_3_22_2018_v168_20k_data_3_152217750_236716_0 and de_nbody_3_22_2018_v168_20k_data_1_1522177504_216535_2 Now as I said it only applies to the units that require three CPU's to run, if there are three units working off separate CPU's then they run smoothly, I do have a third laptop that is SSD that has no problems at all so this may be a factor but as I have stated I've only had this problem reasonably recently so I would appreciate any advice you can give. I can't remember the modfit units are affected but I may be wrong. I look forward to your reply Nick
	ID: 67342 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Jake Weiss Volunteer moderator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 25 Feb 13 Posts: 484 Credit: 15,416,978 RAC: 122,881	Message 67345 - Posted: 17 Apr 2018, 13:34:37 UTC
	Nicklw, Separation runs are single threaded or GPU only so this definitely seems like an Nbody issue. My guess is that the simulation is incorrectly calculating the remaining time. Towards the end of the simulation Nbody does extra calculations per timestep to determine if it is done which can cause the workunit to take a little longer than predicted to complete. Sidd is aware of the issue, but I'm unsure if he has a solution planned yet. Sorry I can't be of more help, Jake
	ID: 67345 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Nicklw Send message Joined: 16 Aug 09 Posts: 9 Credit: 20,423,741 RAC: 23,615	Message 67382 - Posted: 22 Apr 2018, 8:58:27 UTC - in response to Message 67345.
	Jake,thanks for looking into it for me however the problem still exists and so unfortunately I've joined another site as well, I would love to dedicate my computers to Milkyway only but as I have said I can't check every half hour or so to see if every thing is operating OK. Please let me know if you do find what the problem is and if it is fixed then I will return in full, by the way it maybe why you are having trouble with unreliable hosts, worth looking into wouldn't you say? Regards, Nick
	ID: 67382 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Nicklw Send message Joined: 16 Aug 09 Posts: 9 Credit: 20,423,741 RAC: 23,615	Message 67383 - Posted: 22 Apr 2018, 9:34:36 UTC - in response to Message 67345.
	Jake, sorry Man but I forgot to mention that any WU that requires three CPU's to run I am now aborting, please fix this ASAP Nick
	ID: 67383 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Jake Weiss Volunteer moderator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 25 Feb 13 Posts: 484 Credit: 15,416,978 RAC: 122,881	Message 67387 - Posted: 23 Apr 2018, 15:19:32 UTC
	Hey Nicklw, To solve this problem temporarily you can set your preferences to not accept Nbody workunits. Jake
	ID: 67387 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Post to thread

Message boards : News : New Runs