What the servers (and the people behind the project) need
is to see a more positve attitude from those who hammer
them. ;-)) Call it respect - call it patience -
call it trust. But a positive view Always makes things better -
And if it doesnt actually "fix" the problems here - at least
it will show we are here to Contribute - not to Receive.

When MW works, I`ll crunch with what I have atm -

Good Luck to you Travis! ;-)



I'm with you 100% on this......

Believe it or not Arion, so are 95% of the people here ...........

I am joining in, too... :-)

Yea but.... who's winning?

[edit] Dam, I just noticed - I hit the 5 million ;)

It seems like the credits granted start low and increase to about normal (or pre-outage) levels after a few WUs are reported. At least now the results are staying up a little longer than the last couple of restarts so we can see them a little more easily.

I´ve noticed it, too.

Now I´m granted 12.5 credits for 418 sec.

Travis must be testing us...to see if we're paying attention. ;)

It seems like the credits granted start low and increase to about normal (or pre-outage) levels after a few WUs are reported. At least now the results are staying up a little longer than the last couple of restarts so we can see them a little more easily.

They seem to be crunching fine, but the credits ahve dropped again.
57355 just gave me 4.57 credits for 694.77 seconds on an Athlon 64 3200+ (back to 23.68 credits/hour from 108)

...I finally have an opt. app. for Windows ! )

Can I have it to? To put on zslip.com ?

[edit] Sorry, I should have done that by PM. Please ignore this post [/edit]

[another edit] Kurt you have PM ;)

yeah. our s**t is broke to f**k. hopefully we'll get it working in the next day or two.

*edit*

i guess when a moderator posts, they don't edit stuff. i put some stars in there for the faint of heart.

Well... Please make your complains here...

I think Logan hates us :(

The only things what I hate are the constant changes of criteria to stablish what are the parameters of the project (credits, WUs length, limits...)

Best regards.

Well, the project is still " Alpha ", and you have to deal with all kinds of
changes being implemented........

One thing I don`t understand, is the " no opt. app. for Windows " issue, and
therefore I ceased crunching this project, although I`m really interested
in the science of MW.

Best regards

Kurt

There are some working on that. I had a go at compiling for Win. I have got stuck but I should be able to work it out with enough time.

Unfortunately real_life@home and life@work are very busy and demanding. My wife is busy writing her master's thesis and that is sucking a lot of her time away. I'm reading it when she gives me a copy, working on my PhD (programming, experiment set up and result processing being the current major tasks) and writing my own research paper. Then there are all the chores in life to do. And so on.

When I get some free time and my brain isn't completely fried out (I think I blew a couple of fuses in it) then I have another go at compiling Win apps.

Well... Please make your complains here...

I think Logan hates us :(

The only things what I hate are the constant changes of criteria to stablish what are the parameters of the project (credits, WUs length, limits...)

Best regards.

Come on Logan, reducing the credit to a half just puts the stock in line with seti AK V8 - which is still too much for CPP.

The optimized/recompiled apps still get more.

anywhere from 40-60 min is about right on the stock .13 app q6600

I thought this stock "optimized" app. was supposed to be fast. I went from 35min. on the .07 opp. app. to 2hrs 35min. on the stock app.! I thought all you were gonna do was put some tags in the .07 opp. app. that worked and re release it as the "new" stock app.

I`m not sure what was optimized, but I am sure, that it wasn`t the runtime !
From 6,5 min. I´m up to 58 min. again with stock app. 0.13.


Regards
Kurt

I think Dave just put "optimized" there to distinguish it from the older version of the milkyway app (which was quite slow in comparison) -- astronomy_X. I've changed the name in the database so hopefully this will update for people. It should be just "MilkyWay@Home" now.

I thought this stock "optimized" app. was supposed to be fast. I went from 35min. on the .07 opp. app. to 2hrs 35min. on the stock app.! I thought all you were gonna do was put some tags in the .07 opp. app. that worked and re release it as the "new" stock app.