I see that trolls grow everywhere, even in beautiful projects.

Can I help you in any way to port the application to macOS?

Windows, being windows, uses the same cert store for the OS and the browser, which is why those clients aren't having problems as they already have the certs in their cert store.

P.S. I note that the new master URL has -new added, but the web site doesn't -- is that the long-term plan or will the master URL end up changing back to not having -new in it?

milkyway-new.cs.rpi.edu is the master address but using just milkyway.cs.rpi.edu will also reach milkyway-new. This is the way the security team here at RPI set it up.

How do we add the project back in?

I seem to be getting an error message that says try again later

Yes Win11 is much better than Win10 but just so you know Win11 does do some 'urgent' updates that under Win10 were classified as 'normal', so you might want to be aware of them too and no you can't just not do them unlesss you have the Pro version or are willing to go thru the Management Console or what we used to call Services.

Great job guys!.:D If you're updating to Windows 11

well it was dead for two weeks before you just bumped it...

+1
sorry - need at the least new specs
have been away for a while and just wanted to post something "useless"
cheers S-F-V

I believe that others have had the same problem.

Yes, most if not all of them because of not allowing BOINC to use 100% of CPU time.

BUT the software isn't optimized to handle any of that except by accident and for most people they would never take the time to figure out which is best, it's alot like at Prime Grid where they advise people to not use hyperthreading to crunch their tasks and to limit AMD cpu cores to stay on a single 'chiclet' yet people still say 'I've got 24 cpu's cores and I'm putting them all on one task and it's working so I'm okay'. Little do they realize that with a bit of tweaking they could easily get 2 or even 3 times the output that they are getting now.

Even without improvements, any parallel code that does not use 100% of a critical resource may benefit from running more threads, so as one thread is busy elsewhere, the other thread can use the resource. I used to use double the CPU core count to ensure close to max throughput. If Intel hyperthreaded processors, one might even double that.

But you think it's possible to program a benchmark that can test everything? LMAO

bronze medal in the Strawman and Deflection event!

sounds like a skill issue. if you can't code just say that.

Nobody can code or there wouldn't be bugs.

only silver medal in the Mental Gymnastics and Logical Fallacy Biathlon this time.

gotta try harder next time.

Oh yeah. Sure, it's so easy. Wonder why no one, including the people who make money off benchmarks hasn't thought of that. Hmmm.

You must be brilliant.

sounds like a skill issue. if you can't code just say that.

And I'm tired of you not understanding it's very easy to write a benchmark which tests everything, then you could have a gaming score, a video editing score, a Boinc type score, etc, etc. All you need is a bunch of instructions of the type used in these projects.

Since it’s so easy. I very much look forward to your all encompassing benchmark. It’s sure to take over the world. How much time do you need? A couple hours should do it, no? It’s really an easy thing after all.

But who would pay you to do the testing

companies don't care about Boinc scores, or this score or that score especially if it isn't similar to someplace elses scores,