Posts by LiborA
log in
1) Message boards : Number crunching : MilkyWay_GPU II (Message 24945)
Posted 11 Jun 2009 by Profile LiborA
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Deleted Accounts (Message 19365)
Posted 18 Apr 2009 by Profile LiborA
I also know on of cruncher with deleted account. His alias is gigadisk and cross project ID is 65bb2b3a135cbfea9ca42a25feed4a25.

EDIT: gigadisk has create a new account as Dave wrote on massage 19002
Edit 2: His old ID is 4719 (thanks for free-dc stats :) )
3) Message boards : Number crunching : GECCO2008 paper accepted (Message 2272)
Posted 15 Mar 2008 by Profile LiborA
Congratulation Travis
4) Message boards : Number crunching : More Work !!! Please :) (Message 2247)
Posted 14 Mar 2008 by Profile LiborA
Again without new works:

14.3.2008 7:24:27|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 4906 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 14.3.2008 7:24:32|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 14.3.2008 7:25:33|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 4916 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 14.3.2008 7:25:38|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 14.3.2008 7:26:39|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 4927 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 14.3.2008 7:26:44|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
5) Message boards : Number crunching : More Work !!! Please :) (Message 2207)
Posted 13 Mar 2008 by Profile LiborA
To Crunch3r: very nice picture

To Travis: Pleas, I'd like new work
6) Message boards : Number crunching : Pipeline drained - what about new WUs? (Message 1724)
Posted 15 Feb 2008 by Profile LiborA
... just started up a new set. i've been trying to start different numbers of searches at the same time to see how it effects the convergence rates, so i have to wait for the previous batch to finish before i start up a new one.


Thats sounds very well. Do you think about add batch statistics/monitor on home page? (For example batch monitor have QMC or SIMAP)
7) Questions and Answers : Wish list : 20 WU per core - not per host (Message 1511)
Posted 16 Jan 2008 by Profile LiborA
Yes, 20 WUs per core will be better :-)
8) Questions and Answers : Wish list : Linux x86-64bit application (Message 1510)
Posted 16 Jan 2008 by Profile LiborA
Me too.

Also Me :)
9) Message boards : Number crunching : No work from project ... (Message 1416)
Posted 10 Jan 2008 by Profile LiborA
Again without WUs for crunching :-(

My comps are hungry


I think we shouldn't expect too much while the M@H team are looking into the server crashes - but I hope they figure it out soon!


Yeah, thats truth. I wish good luck to M@H team with solving server problem.
10) Message boards : Number crunching : No work from project ... (Message 1414)
Posted 10 Jan 2008 by Profile LiborA
Again without WUs for crunching :-(

My comps are hungry
11) Message boards : Number crunching : Windows vs. Linux application (Message 1171)
Posted 25 Dec 2007 by Profile LiborA
The problem behind this might be that the linux is using a 64 bit binary (where i'm pretty sure the windows does not).


Are you sure? I have downloaded astronomy_1.13_i686-pc-linux-gnu executable, it seems as 32b application? And on download folder isn't x86_64 application available.

We're working on getting a 64-bit windows system to compile on which will hopefully improve the times on windows.


Its a very good message for all users of 64b Windows OS :-)
12) Message boards : Number crunching : Windows vs. Linux application (Message 1168)
Posted 23 Dec 2007 by Profile LiborA
Hallo, on our team board we discussed about crunching time of Convolution Work Units. We compared two machines and results are interesting.

'bosh - AMD X2 4200 Windows XP
WU-------h--m--s
gs_72... 00:19:39
gs_70... 00:19:41
gs_62... 00:05:26
gs_60... 00:05:25

LiborA - AMD A64 2800+ OpenSuse 10.3 64b
WU--------h--m--s
gs_74 ... 00:13:39
gs_73 ... 00:13:31
gs_72 ... 00:13:43
gs_72 ... 00:13:34
gs_71 ... 00:13:29
gs_62 ... 00:05:26
gs_60 ... 00:05:24

It seems that for non-convolution Work Units the application need a similar time for the WU in the same range. But for Convolution Work Units is linux application a more, more effective.
13) Message boards : Number crunching : convolution searches (Message 1155)
Posted 22 Dec 2007 by Profile LiborA
WTF? You only crunch 3 gs5's an hour with a dualcore Athlon64 4000+?
My Athlon64 3500+ single-core does the same. And it is not OC'd.
Or is it just 18cr per hour per core?


Yes this is per core
14) Message boards : Number crunching : convolution searches (Message 1094)
Posted 15 Dec 2007 by Profile LiborA
For this my comp is still credit system 6,5 cr per WU about 10% worse as for gs_3x WU.
For gs_3x I got about 20 cr/hour
For gs_5x I got about 18 cr/hour
15) Message boards : Number crunching : Per Host Limit (Message 533)
Posted 23 Nov 2007 by Profile LiborA
Interesting!

On My Windows machine I get only 8 WUs per CPU per day but on Linux machine is different situation.
I joined my Linux machine today in project and yet I have 29 WUs downloaded (5 WUs from thiese was cancelled by server as redundant result - and the second interest think is that all of thiese cancelled WUs was sended to another cruncher after cancelation on my computer )




Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2017 AstroInformatics Group