Welcome to MilkyWay@home

Posts by nickth

1) Message boards : Number crunching : More Invalid wu's (Message 26142)
Posted 21 Jun 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
I have had a couple of them to

ps_sgr_210F5_2s_hiw_2806004_1245577449
ps_sgr_210F5_3s_hiw_2829099_1245580448
2) Message boards : MilkyWay@home Science : 2012 (Message 26085)
Posted 20 Jun 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
And thats where google becomes your friend.

To start with you have to look at the natural disarsters that could happen on or around the date of 21 dec 2012.

1. Solor Flares yes i think we can really say yes this is going to happen because it has been confurmed by NASA and Harverd white papers.

2. Super Volcanos and earthquakes well yes maybe and maybe not. There are three places round the world that look like could turning in Super Volcanos on or around that time and they are YELLOWSTONE, MOUNT ST HELENS and a third in Asia which i can on remmeber but is in the area of the December 2004 tsunami. Note that these are only maybes and even the geolagis are don't really know.

3. Planet X what a load of rubbish even NASA said that this one is a hoax the only comet or large meteor that could cause and problems would be one in 2024 that the will only be a near miss
3) Message boards : Number crunching : MilkyWay_GPU II (Message 24814)
Posted 10 Jun 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
Peter - Is "parrot" off-topic or a opptim. app for GPU? update me on it, will you? Lol. ;-)


I picked two words that Ice wrote - "dead certain"...and referenced the Monty Python "Dead Parrot" sketch...

It's never as funny if you have to explain it...

Oh, and the whole "tea and a slice" thing... Pink Floyd


Hmm... isnt that parrot even Norwegian? wow - thats a coincidence. lol.

A Norwegian Blue if I recall. But he wasn't dead. Just resting.


Pining for the fjords...

There.. I told you he wasn't dead. He was pining for the fjords and must have been momentarily stunned...




The Parrot Sketch



No he is not i told you he is dead gone to meet his maker and sing with the choir invisible
4) Message boards : MilkyWay@home Science : 2012 (Message 24595)
Posted 8 Jun 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
It is important to define what the Galactic Alignment is in precise astronomical terms. (See the Glossary below for terms.)

The Galactic Alignment is the alignment of the December solstice sun with the Galactic equator. This alignment occurs as a result of the precession of the equinoxes.

Precession is caused by the earth wobbling very slowly on its axis and shifts the position of the equinoxes and solstices one degree every 71.5 years. Because the sun is one-half of a degree wide, it will take the December solstice sun 36 years to precess through the Galactic equator (see diagram below).

The precise alignment of the solstice point (the precise center-point of the body of the sun as viewed from earth) with the Galactic equator was calculated to occur in 1998 (Jean Meeus, Mathematical Astronomy Morsels, 1997).

Thus, the Galactic Alignment "zone" is 1998 +/- 18 years = 1980 - 2016. This is "era-2012."

This Galactic Alignment occurs only once every 26,000 years, and was what the ancient Maya were pointing to with the 2012 end-date of their Long Count calendar.



These are the astronomical facts of the matter. From a larger perspective, we can visualize the 2012 Galactic Alignment in the following way:



Position A is where the December solstice sun was in relation to the Milky Way some 3,000 years ago. Position B is 1,500 years ago. And position C is "era-2012", when the December solstice sun has converged, as a result of the precession of the equinoxes, with the exact center-line of the Milky Way (the Galactic equator). Notice that the place of alignment is where the 'nuclear bulge' of the Galactic Center is located.

A long awaiting digital portrayal of precession and galactic alignments is now available on Nick Fiorenza's web site.



Descriptions of the process are also there, but it should be noted that Nick describes what I refer to as "the solstice-galaxy alignment" with a preference for the equinox as the measuring reference. Thus, he speaks of the "Holy Cross" of the equinox axis and the Milky Way. The point is that "solstice-galaxy alignment" and "equinox-galaxy cross" refer to the same event.

It is my hope that the these definitions will help to standardize the terminology so we can clearly discuss the rare precessional alignment that culminates in era-2012.

This was written by By John Major Jenkins
5) Message boards : MilkyWay@home Science : 2012 (Message 24589)
Posted 8 Jun 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
Ok lets jump back a bit.

First of all is

1. How much of this is true about the Gallactic Alignment that ment to happen on 21st December 2012?

2. This comes from NASA website.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/10mar_stormwarning.htm

March 10, 2006: It's official: Solar minimum has arrived. Sunspots have all but vanished. Solar flares are nonexistent. The sun is utterly quiet.

Like the quiet before a storm.

This week researchers announced that a storm is coming--the most intense solar maximum in fifty years. The prediction comes from a team led by Mausumi Dikpati of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). "The next sunspot cycle will be 30% to 50% stronger than the previous one," she says. If correct, the years ahead could produce a burst of solar activity second only to the historic Solar Max of 1958.

see captionThat was a solar maximum. The Space Age was just beginning: Sputnik was launched in Oct. 1957 and Explorer 1 (the first US satellite) in Jan. 1958. In 1958 you couldn't tell that a solar storm was underway by looking at the bars on your cell phone; cell phones didn't exist. Even so, people knew something big was happening when Northern Lights were sighted three times in Mexico. A similar maximum now would be noticed by its effect on cell phones, GPS, weather satellites and many other modern technologies.

Right: Intense auroras over Fairbanks, Alaska, in 1958. [More]

Dikpati's prediction is unprecedented. In nearly-two centuries since the 11-year sunspot cycle was discovered, scientists have struggled to predict the size of future maxima—and failed. Solar maxima can be intense, as in 1958, or barely detectable, as in 1805, obeying no obvious pattern.

The key to the mystery, Dikpati realized years ago, is a conveyor belt on the sun.

We have something similar here on Earth—the Great Ocean Conveyor Belt, popularized in the sci-fi movie The Day After Tomorrow. It is a network of currents that carry water and heat from ocean to ocean--see the diagram below. In the movie, the Conveyor Belt stopped and threw the world's weather into chaos.

see caption
Above: Earth's "Great Ocean Conveyor Belt." [More]

The sun's conveyor belt is a current, not of water, but of electrically-conducting gas. It flows in a loop from the sun's equator to the poles and back again. Just as the Great Ocean Conveyor Belt controls weather on Earth, this solar conveyor belt controls weather on the sun. Specifically, it controls the sunspot cycle.

Solar physicist David Hathaway of the National Space Science & Technology Center (NSSTC) explains: "First, remember what sunspots are--tangled knots of magnetism generated by the sun's inner dynamo. A typical sunspot exists for just a few weeks. Then it decays, leaving behind a 'corpse' of weak magnetic fields."

Enter the conveyor belt.

see caption"The top of the conveyor belt skims the surface of the sun, sweeping up the magnetic fields of old, dead sunspots. The 'corpses' are dragged down at the poles to a depth of 200,000 km where the sun's magnetic dynamo can amplify them. Once the corpses (magnetic knots) are reincarnated (amplified), they become buoyant and float back to the surface." Presto—new sunspots!

Right: The sun's "great conveyor belt." [Larger image]

All this happens with massive slowness. "It takes about 40 years for the belt to complete one loop," says Hathaway. The speed varies "anywhere from a 50-year pace (slow) to a 30-year pace (fast)."

When the belt is turning "fast," it means that lots of magnetic fields are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going to be intense. This is a basis for forecasting: "The belt was turning fast in 1986-1996," says Hathaway. "Old magnetic fields swept up then should re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011."

Like most experts in the field, Hathaway has confidence in the conveyor belt model and agrees with Dikpati that the next solar maximum should be a doozy. But he disagrees with one point. Dikpati's forecast puts Solar Max at 2012. Hathaway believes it will arrive sooner, in 2010 or 2011.

"History shows that big sunspot cycles 'ramp up' faster than small ones," he says. "I expect to see the first sunspots of the next cycle appear in late 2006 or 2007—and Solar Max to be underway by 2010 or 2011."

Who's right? Time will tell. Either way, a storm is coming.

and is backed up with this

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007EOSTr..88T.210Z

Title:
In Brief: Next solar cycle expected to be intense
Authors:
Zielinski, Sarah
Publication:
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Volume 88, Issue 19, p. 210-210
Publication Date:
05/2007
Origin:
AGU
AGU Keywords:
Solar Physics, Astrophysics, and Astronomy: Solar activity cycle (2162), Space Weather: Forecasting (2722)
Abstract Copyright:
(c) 2007: American Geophysical Union
DOI:
10.1029/2007EO190005
Bibliographic Code:
2007EOSTr..88T.210Z
Abstract
Solar Cycle 24 will be a period of intense solar storms that will peak in late 2011 to mid-2012, according to the NOAA-led Solar Cycle 24 Prediction Panel's consensus forecast that was released on 25 April. The forecast will be used for planning by government and industry groups; power and communication networks, satellites, and airplanes can be affected by sunspot activity. The panel evaluated more than 40 predictions, which ranged from 42 to 185 sunspots total for the cycle. The consensus prediction was based on six techniques, three based on statistics and three based on physics and theory of the Sun's dynamo conveyor belt. The validity of the prediction will soon get its first test; if it does not accurately predict the Solar Cycle 23 minimum, it will also likely fail to predict the timing, duration, and intensity of the next peak, said panel chair Douglas Biesecker, a solar physicist with the NOAA Space Environment Center.

Well yes we have sun spot activity all the time but what i can get from this is that these solor flares will be as bad or worse than the ones in 1954 and since the was not much electrical around at the time it would not of been noticed.






6) Message boards : MilkyWay@home Science : 2012 (Message 24494)
Posted 7 Jun 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
Hi Travis and the rest of the guys.

How much of this is true about the Gallactic Alignment that ment to happen on 21st December 2012 and is it true about what could happen?

Also what do you guys know of Planet X thats ment to be around at the same time?

I only ask because of the information i found at this web site


It's as true as Y2K.

The only thing that could happen is a super massive solar flare, if the cycle is figured correctly that would wipe all electronics out. (and I highly doubt this)


Well here is a little more about the Gallactic Alignment here
7) Message boards : MilkyWay@home Science : 2012 (Message 24488)
Posted 7 Jun 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
Hi Travis and the rest of the guys.

How much of this is true about the Gallactic Alignment that ment to happen on 21st December 2012 and is it true about what could happen?

Also what do you guys know of Planet X thats ment to be around at the same time?

I only ask because of the information i found at this web site
8) Message boards : Number crunching : Why is it so hard to get work? (Message 23326)
Posted 25 May 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:


The project is not a CPU or a GPU project.
It is both. No one has exclusive rights to claim it as theirs. The project can be run on both platforms.

The GPU apps can do more work. That is both obvious and true.

The CPU guys can run any other bonic project that they wish. The GPU guys are extremely limited. The ATI GPU even more so.

The project for whatever reason could not see that the ATI GPU application would be this much of a success so they have not moved forward before things got like this. The feeder simply cannot keep up for whatever reason that none of us know for sure.

If ones would read about the GPU project (yes you CPU people) you would see that they plan to bar the use of GPU's running CPU tasks. This would most likely be done by the application used to run the work unit.
However this does not mean that a computer could not run both CPU tasks on the CPU, and GPU tasks on the GPU since there would be a clear difference in the projects.



Right lets get this straight....

Thwe project is or was CPU only the only way it has become more GPU than CPU is because
1. Travis decieded to release the code
2. The code release was only ment to be to see if there could be a speed up of CPU
3. Only only reason you can crunch on your ATI GPU's is because some bright spark decieded to muck around with Travis's code to get it to work.

4. SCRIPTS HAMMER THE SERVER if you don't believe me as DAVE

5. I have not been able to get work for my CPU's for over a week because of all your soding ATI GPU's

6. WILL YOU ALL STOP FLAMING.



9) Message boards : Number crunching : How to get GPU WU ? (Message 21656)
Posted 8 May 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
You have recieved no work units yet because the CUDA side of the project is not ready yet. GPU work is only running on ATI high end cards at the moment

Sorry for that
10) Message boards : Number crunching : WUs distribution (Message 21527)
Posted 7 May 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:

BarryAZ said .....

For ATI GPU support, there is a need for some significant effort (which may require some collaboration between the folks who put together the ATI-GPU application here and those other projects). Might be nice to see a project which is openly GPU (GPU Grid comes to mind) work toward an ATI optimized client.

For that matter, other projects not owned by DA (say Spinhenge, POEM, Einstein) might be candidates as well. We can hope as with MilkyWay being the ONLY ATI GPU BOINC project, it will continue to be inundated with work requests that it may not be able to fill.





Welll the nice folks that put ATI-GPU's together are AMD and reading over at the BOINC DEV web site fourm they turn around and said no chance you want to run BOINC applications on our hardware you will have to build the application yourself.
The earlest time for BOINC to be running ATI-GPU software like CUDA will be around BOINC 6.8. and since BOINC DEV team don't seam to be in any rush you would be looking at about 2010 or 2011

Oh yes regarding BOINC its self it has one hell of a lot of bugs in it anyway and some even go back to 2007 and have still not been fixed yet. Which include wu distribution problems like getting to many task from one project and not enough from another.

IE. like requesting 1 days work for seti gpu and getting 400 task and my 9800gt's cound not even do that amount in one day.

And also if appears the if you don't have you don't have your preference set on the website to the same a what is set in the BOINC preferences then that will cause problems as well because the override dose not work to well
11) Message boards : Number crunching : WUs distribution (Message 21407)
Posted 6 May 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
Well i have done a bit of digging to why not everyone is getting work units all the time.

The credit per day numbers come from boinc stats but this is really intresting numbers and maybe why the server is having really bad problems keeping up.

Lets start right of the top 100 users from Milkyway boinc stats

26 users have day credit of over 100,000

Now if you avarege that day credit total but say 27 credit per work unit
that adds up to 3703 work units per day.

The top user is doing about 1,500,000 credit per day.
Which works out at 55,555 work units per day.

Now since we can only have 6 work units per cpu at a time just from those few users it works out at 151,937 units per day and since a lot of those will be done through gpus.

Oh yes just a few more number there is 18013 users and out of the first 1000 users only 264 are not running the project or just cant get work but may be still making request calls for work.

12) Message boards : Number crunching : WU abuse (Message 16785)
Posted 24 Mar 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:

It currently stands at 6 units per core, no-one gets more than any-one else, the only difference is how many 6's you get



Here Here totally agree with you....

Its almost like say why buy a ATI GPU 4870 for £165.00 from my local computer store and only be able to use it on one project.
Where as i could buy a Intel Core 2 QuadPro Q6600 8MB LGA775 2.40GHz 1066FSB SLACR for £170.00 once again from my local computer store and be able to use in on all projects

13) Message boards : Number crunching : WU abuse (Message 16757)
Posted 24 Mar 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
You need some help nickth. Sell that garbage all you want you missed one big point. IT'S SHARED COMPUTING! overclocking, opt apps, stronger machines, gpu's.


I think you should get back in your pram before you fall out and hurt yourself again.
My post was aboput ideas of what the problem was.

Your script only helps YOU


No it dose not just help me it helps everyone else that wants to use it thats why its PUBLICLY shown in the forum.

while taking work away from the pool that is shared with everybody. It is like jumping ahead in line. Yes, gpu's have created a feeding frenzy for points, that's what's driving this. YOU can't afford to let your machines run dry? why? try explaining to me the " can't afford " part. YOU,YOU,YOU....oh my god get a life.


And you are so wrong there to

Your computer request calls
32106629 31529032 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:15:17 UTC Over Success Done 17.66 0.10 27.77
32106628 31529031 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:14:12 UTC Over Success Done 18.50 0.11 27.77
32106615 31529018 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:14:12 UTC Over Success Done 17.88 0.10 27.77
32106614 31529017 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:13:06 UTC Over Success Done 21.14 0.12 27.77
32106613 31529016 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:13:06 UTC Over Success Done 21.16 0.12 27.77
32106612 31529015 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:12:51 UTC Over Success Done 20.73 0.12 27.77
32106611 31529014 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:12:51 UTC Over Success Done 20.83 0.12 27.77
32106610 31529013 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:11:45 UTC Over Success Done 20.86 0.12 27.77
32106609 31529012 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:11:45 UTC Over Success Done 20.77 0.12 27.77
32106608 31529011 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:11:31 UTC Over Success Done 21.00 0.12 27.77
32106607 31529010 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:11:31 UTC Over Success Done 21.00 0.12 27.77
32106606 31529009 24 Mar 2009 11:07:10 UTC 24 Mar 2009 11:11:31 UTC Over Success Done 21.06 0.12 27.77

My computer request calls

32066173 31489056 24 Mar 2009 9:59:32 UTC 24 Mar 2009 10:56:31 UTC Over Success Done 773.34 3.34 27.77
32066172 31489055 24 Mar 2009 9:59:32 UTC 24 Mar 2009 10:56:31 UTC Over Success Done 769.70 3.32 27.77
32066171 31489054 24 Mar 2009 9:59:32 UTC 24 Mar 2009 10:56:31 UTC Over Success Done 772.97 3.34 27.77
32066170 31489053 24 Mar 2009 9:59:32 UTC 24 Mar 2009 10:56:31 UTC Over Success Done 773.95 3.34 27.77
32066169 31489052 24 Mar 2009 9:59:32 UTC 24 Mar 2009 10:30:50 UTC Over Success Done 776.53 3.35 27.77
32066168 31489051 24 Mar 2009 9:59:32 UTC 24 Mar 2009 10:30:50 UTC Over Success Done 775.69 3.35 27.77
32066167 31489050 24 Mar 2009 9:59:32 UTC 24 Mar 2009 10:16:19 UTC Over Success Done 777.84 3.36 27.77
32066166 31489049 24 Mar 2009 9:59:32 UTC 24 Mar 2009 10:16:19 UTC Over Success Done 778.84 3.36 27.77
31970484 31394122 24 Mar 2009 7:19:39 UTC 24 Mar 2009 8:39:37 UTC Over Success Done 473.30 2.04 18.41
31970483 31394121 24 Mar 2009 7:19:39 UTC 24 Mar 2009 8:19:37 UTC Over Success Done 476.94 2.06 18.41
31970482 31394120 24 Mar 2009 7:19:39 UTC 24 Mar 2009 8:19:37 UTC Over Success Done 476.48 2.06 18.41
31970481 31394119 24 Mar 2009 7:19:39 UTC 24 Mar 2009 8:19:37 UTC Over Success Done 477.00 2.06 18.41
31970480 31394118 24 Mar 2009 7:19:39 UTC 24 Mar 2009 8:19:37 UTC Over Success Done 478.73 2.07 18.41
31970479 31394117 24 Mar 2009 7:19:39 UTC 24 Mar 2009 7:59:42 UTC Over Success Done 477.45 2.06 18.41


By the way I have a gpu, was getting 98k, now 60k.


OH MY GOD i though this project was about the science not the credit. God your so worried that you have lost 38K I would be so happy to if i even got 10k on my two computers but that not going to happen am i bother no..

I think it you who should be getting a life and asking yourself wether your here just for those wonderfully high credits or here for the sciense
14) Message boards : Number crunching : WU abuse (Message 16550)
Posted 22 Mar 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
For as start i think most people in this thread have shot themselves in the foot and should read the forum more then they would understand what the problem is and to why there are few work units and to why poeple would run the updater script.

First of all the project is still in ALPHA testing.

Secondly from front page
Reducing the WU Queue
February 27, 2009
I'm reducing the workunit queue to 6 per core. Increasing it to 20 seemed to make the work availability problem worse. I'm thinking that with a smaller number it will take more work requests to clear out the scheduler's work queue. This is just a temporary fix so don't get too worked up about it. Once we get the scheduler's queue increased we'll up the WU queue again.


which is still is on going has has not really worked because of

Message 15663 - Posted 16 Mar 2009 17:33:37 UTC

1. Is the server a dedicated sever or is it used for something else as well?

2. Is the server at the moment getting hammered by?

A. Someone like that has 2 computers with 2 duo cores who is running an updater script say every 20 mins.
B. Someone that has a farm of computer?
C. Someone that has a farm of computers with ATI cards that complete work units in about 1.30 min?

nickth


Message 15668 - Posted 16 Mar 2009 19:18:15 UTC - in response to Message 15663.

The server is dedicated to specifically the milkyway project. It can handle quite a bit but C is probably stressing it the most currently because the workunits complete so quickly.

Dave Przybylo
MilkyWay@home Developer
Department of Computer Science
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute


and

Message 16375 - Posted 21 Mar 2009 5:06:47 UTC
However, everything seems to be running fairly smoothy except for the workunit distribution issue. But I'm almost certain that the server can't keep up with all the requests from the users with graphics cards.

Dave Przybylo
MilkyWay@home Developer
Department of Computer Science
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute


But there is a way to solve the whole problem but with Travis not around at the moment

Message 16375 - Posted 21 Mar 2009 5:06:47 UTC

I'm not sure where Travis is. I haven't talked to him in days but have seen emails pass by that he wrote to various people that I was copied on.

Dave Przybylo
MilkyWay@home Developer
Department of Computer Science
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute


And solving the problem would be with this

Message 15713 - Posted 16 Mar 2009 22:49:39 UTC - in response to Message 15712.

I think we may need to separate the database from the actual server software. They're both on the same hard disk. The server hardware is excellent. We have 8gb of ram. I think a new hard drive would greatly increase the speed however I'm not sure what type it is. I'm almost positive it's SCSI but don't know the details.

Dave Przybylo
MilkyWay@home Developer
Department of Computer Science
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute


As for the updater script as mentioned before its not illegal and is talked about here and here at all what was illegal was optimized apps that were not true to the project and that all happened on Seti@home a long time ago.

You could also say is Overclocking illegal to a project becasue that makes the work units finish quicker to. So should we ban all users that Overclock thier computers and GPU cards.
NO i don't think so because it is thier own choice to Overclock or not

The updater script is an aid to getting work if you are away from your computer as i am becase i work 40 hours a week need sleep and can't aford to let my computers run dry as i have seen before the updater script for 36+ hours because the options for updating in BOINC are very weak.
And before you say it "Why don't you run another project?" because i don't want to i like running ALPHA projects and i have a free will to which projects i run or dont run.


So really it all boils down to this. There is no WU Abuse because the project is as i have mention before in ALPA Phase and is not really upto GPU work unit finishing so fast. But hopefully it will get sorted out when Travis gets back to us and can build longer work units, and sort the server out by maybe adding another hard drive so that it works better.

So if you are not happy with your computers sitting idle for so long either run the updater scripe as that little script dose not seem to hammer the server OR go and find another project to crunch for there is 60 projects to choice from


15) Message boards : Number crunching : Questions For Travis (Message 15663)
Posted 16 Mar 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
OK so where do we start.

Right let us start with the server

1. Is the server a dedicated sever or is it used for something else as well?

2. Is the server at the moment getting hammered by?

A. Someone like that has 2 computers with 2 duo cores who is running an updater script say every 20 mins.
B. Someone that has a farm of computer?
C. Someone that has a farm of computers with ATI cards that complete work units in about 1.30 min?
( this was one persons cobstones for today 354,135.96 on milkyway)

3. If the server is not dedicated them i would recomend this thread


Now lets move onto the work units themselves

1. How long after a work unit has been validated dose the science of that work unit become invalid?

2. Is there a way to increase the amount of work units on the server as it took about 5 hours before one of my computer was able to get work even though im running this update script?

3. Can the cpu limit be increased again because with these ATI and optimised app the work is getting done quicker?



16) Message boards : Cafe MilkyWay : Word Link (Message 15488)
Posted 15 Mar 2009 by Profile nickth
Post:
Toy
17) Message boards : Number crunching : Computational error with fedora 9 (Message 3479)
Posted 13 May 2008 by Profile nickth
Post:
HELP every task gose this way with fedora 9

<core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process got signal 11
</message>
<stderr_txt>

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Fedora 9
Linux
2.6.25-14.fc9.x86_64

Terminal Window
SIGPIPE: write on a pipe with no reader
send: -1
send: Broken pipe
18) Message boards : Number crunching : More Work !!! Please :) (Message 3473)
Posted 11 May 2008 by Profile nickth
Post:
Server is out of work again

looks like it has caught up again
19) Message boards : Number crunching : Milestones (Message 3407)
Posted 29 Apr 2008 by Profile nickth
Post:
100,000 today
20) Message boards : MilkyWay@home Science : The RAS National Astronomy Meeting 2008 (Message 2961)
Posted 2 Apr 2008 by Profile nickth
Post:
Here is the link to the National Astronomy Meeting that happened in my home city of belfast at Queens University

The RAS National Astronomy Meeting 2008

Also this one is very intresting

TWO SUPERNOVA FACTORIES FOUND IN THE MILKY WAY


Next 20

©2024 Astroinformatics Group