1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7422)
Posted 4 Dec 2008 by Woodles Post: Ok, my two pence worth. On a bog standard Intel dual core @ 2.13 GHz, Windows XP, 4 G RAM, the projects that I've crunched this year give the following credits an hour per core. Seti - 41 optimised client Cosmology - 39 QMC - 36 Milkyway - 33 optimised client Milkyway - 30 'old' client PrimeGrid - 18 - 29 depending on sub project Poem - 24 ABC - 22 Enigma - 20 optimised client Einstein - 20 Magnetism - 16 NQueens - 14 Bearing in mind that I haven't run some of the projects for a couple of months and the rate may have changed, the optimised client returns slightly more than the old client for Milkway but still less than the optimised client for Seti. I don't have any data for the stock client on Seti as I haven't used that recently. Looks to me that it's about right at the moment even if it's more than the Seti stock client. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7236)
Posted 2 Dec 2008 by Woodles Post: Think I must be doing something wrong then, 41 credits an hour on Seti with the optimised app, 33 credits an hour with the new app here. Intel dual core @ 2.1GHz. |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group