Welcome to MilkyWay@home

More WU's?

Message boards : Number crunching : More WU's?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
hampsteadpete
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jul 11
Posts: 22
Credit: 4,160,197
RAC: 0
Message 51270 - Posted: 1 Oct 2011, 11:55:47 UTC

Back with another question. Just bought an ATI 6950 so I could do MW, & it's working fine. Problem is, even with priority set @ 400, project will only give me 12 WU's at a time. I crunch them in a few minutes & it takes Boinc considerable time to update & replace them. Had to add Primegrid & Collatz just to keep card busy. Is there some way to get the project to send more MW WU's?

Thanks!
ID: 51270 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile dskagcommunity
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Feb 11
Posts: 170
Credit: 205,557,553
RAC: 0
Message 51271 - Posted: 1 Oct 2011, 12:13:02 UTC

There is nothing YOU can do to change this. Its a project limit. We hope all that it get raised some day ^^
DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at



ID: 51271 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
hampsteadpete
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jul 11
Posts: 22
Credit: 4,160,197
RAC: 0
Message 51272 - Posted: 1 Oct 2011, 12:27:30 UTC - in response to Message 51271.  

Thank you!
ID: 51272 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Andrew McFarland
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Sep 11
Posts: 41
Credit: 185,458,736
RAC: 0
Message 51273 - Posted: 1 Oct 2011, 14:19:01 UTC - in response to Message 51270.  

Mmmmm. 6950. yum. I have to ask, how long does take to do a work unit ? :-)
ID: 51273 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
hampsteadpete
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jul 11
Posts: 22
Credit: 4,160,197
RAC: 0
Message 51274 - Posted: 1 Oct 2011, 17:12:24 UTC - in response to Message 51273.  

Avg total run time on my system is about 83 seconds. Range is 66 to 130 or so. Does that sound right for the ati14 task? I'm still new at this.
ID: 51274 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Andrew McFarland
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Sep 11
Posts: 41
Credit: 185,458,736
RAC: 0
Message 51276 - Posted: 1 Oct 2011, 21:58:25 UTC - in response to Message 51274.  
Last modified: 1 Oct 2011, 22:01:41 UTC

That's excellent! My creaky old 5850 runs about 20-25% slower than that, so it sounds about right.

BTW, you can select a task and hit the "Properties" button to get the apps estimate of your GFLOPS/Second. My gpu tasks read 382.32 while the poor Phenom cores rate 2.6 each! How did we ever crunch without GPU's, eh? :-)
ID: 51276 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bahur

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 11
Posts: 3
Credit: 9,342,428
RAC: 0
Message 51278 - Posted: 2 Oct 2011, 12:14:28 UTC

I am curious about the GFLOPs/sec rate of that HD6950 too. The VLIW4 architecture is supposed to be more efficient than the older VLIW5 (like HD5870) on double precision operations. AMD says that 6950 delivers a theoretical maximum of 562.5 GFLOPs/sec at 800 MHz.

But you should first let the MW project run for some time (like a week or more) so that the BOINC client can adjust the flops factor accordingly. Before that the GFLOPs/sec reading will be smaller than the real value.

My o.c.ed 5870s give 442.45 GFLOPS/sec each (and still slowly increasing). That's 77% of the theoretical peak performance of 576 GFLOPs/sec at 900 MHz and [in my opinion as a computational scientist] is quite a good utilisation of the full GPU potential.
ID: 51278 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
hampsteadpete
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jul 11
Posts: 22
Credit: 4,160,197
RAC: 0
Message 51279 - Posted: 2 Oct 2011, 15:34:34 UTC - in response to Message 51278.  

The task I checked (I didn't know you could do that) is running @ 413.79. The card is running at the default 830 Mhz. It has been running MW for about 4 days. My problem is getting enough WU's to keep it busy. According to my figures, MW yields 150 credits/running minute, while Primegrid is at 87, Collatz at 111, and Moo at 199. I find if I only run one other ATI app, I get the most MW units for some reason, so I'm running Moo and MW. I chose the 6950 over Nvidia 'cause I wanted to run MW, and it didn't matter for the video editing I'm doing. It's disappointing that I can't get enough work to keep it busy. Oh well, I can't get SETI WU's either right now.
ID: 51279 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
HassanShebli

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 10
Posts: 74
Credit: 18,362,557
RAC: 0
Message 51283 - Posted: 2 Oct 2011, 22:35:46 UTC - in response to Message 51279.  

My 6970 with no OC (@830) reaches a minimum 500 GFLOPS/Second easily.

ID: 51283 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : More WU's?

©2024 Astroinformatics Group