Welcome to MilkyWay@home

"Aborted by Project"

Message boards : Number crunching : "Aborted by Project"
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Fluidic

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 12
Posts: 36
Credit: 518,649,742
RAC: 0
Message 58499 - Posted: 4 Jun 2013, 20:49:10 UTC

This happened on one of my machines. I had 7-days worth of workunits ready to be crunched away, and when I logged into my machine, I found that every single one of them was "Aborted by Project". What exactly does this mean and why were they aborted???

I searched for this subject on the message boards under the 'Number Crunching' section and found no information.

Thanks
ID: 58499 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile mikey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 May 09
Posts: 3315
Credit: 519,943,223
RAC: 22,516
Message 58503 - Posted: 5 Jun 2013, 11:16:26 UTC - in response to Message 58499.  

This happened on one of my machines. I had 7-days worth of workunits ready to be crunched away, and when I logged into my machine, I found that every single one of them was "Aborted by Project". What exactly does this mean and why were they aborted???

I searched for this subject on the message boards under the 'Number Crunching' section and found no information.

Thanks


On the website it says 'abandoned' but that is a generic phrase just like 'aborted', it just means you didn't crunch the unit. Did you change any settings on that pc? Did you downgrade the Boinc version for instance?
ID: 58503 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Fluidic

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 12
Posts: 36
Credit: 518,649,742
RAC: 0
Message 58505 - Posted: 5 Jun 2013, 15:41:00 UTC - in response to Message 58503.  

Negative. 7.0.64 always. Strange. BOINC is like a Ferrari, when it runs, it's awesome! When it's broken and needs repair, it's a hella big deal. :P
ID: 58505 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
John Clark

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 08
Posts: 1734
Credit: 64,228,409
RAC: 0
Message 58508 - Posted: 5 Jun 2013, 15:52:12 UTC

Could the WUs have passed their "crunch by" date?
Go away, I was asleep


ID: 58508 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Fluidic

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 12
Posts: 36
Credit: 518,649,742
RAC: 0
Message 58514 - Posted: 5 Jun 2013, 20:07:54 UTC - in response to Message 58508.  

If I remember correctly, they were all due on the 15th. I dunno, baffling. :P
ID: 58514 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Richard Haselgrove

Send message
Joined: 4 Sep 12
Posts: 219
Credit: 456,474
RAC: 0
Message 58516 - Posted: 5 Jun 2013, 20:25:34 UTC - in response to Message 58514.  

If I remember correctly, they were all due on the 15th. I dunno, baffling. :P

Which of your 11 machines were they running on? Without that, it's a bit like looking for a needle in a haystack.

With it, we might be able to drill down into your result lists and (perhaps - I'm guessing here) find that they were the N-Body 1.10 tasks released on 31 May, but withdrawn on 03 June after they were found to fail with a 'not enough coffee' error - see News thread.
ID: 58516 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Fluidic

Send message
Joined: 19 Dec 12
Posts: 36
Credit: 518,649,742
RAC: 0
Message 58522 - Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 6:55:20 UTC

Computer ID: 521327
ID: 58522 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : "Aborted by Project"

©2024 Astroinformatics Group