Welcome to MilkyWay@home

new search

Message boards : Number crunching : new search
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
ironcold

Send message
Joined: 8 Mar 08
Posts: 11
Credit: 676,825
RAC: 0
Message 3751 - Posted: 12 Jun 2008, 21:35:28 UTC - in response to Message 3745.  

I've started up gs_601, and i think i've found the error about why the search was generating nans in the parameter sets. let me know how the gs_601 WUs work.[/quote]

The new WUs seems to work fine till now.
ID: 3751 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Craig Marsh

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 07
Posts: 4
Credit: 24,097,837
RAC: 0
Message 3753 - Posted: 12 Jun 2008, 21:49:03 UTC - in response to Message 3745.  

Ok, i've removed all the gs_600 from the database and stopped that search (so no more WUs should be set out there from gs_600).

I've started up gs_601, and i think i've found the error about why the search was generating nans in the parameter sets. let me know how the gs_601 WUs work.


I can't get any of the gs_601 on any of my comps :(
ID: 3753 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Labbie
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 07
Posts: 327
Credit: 116,463,193
RAC: 0
Message 3757 - Posted: 12 Jun 2008, 22:05:36 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jun 2008, 22:09:53 UTC

We've got another new annoyance with the GS_600's. When Travis removed them form the database, many of us still had these on our machines. Not all of these WUs errored out, so now we've got pendings that don't connect to the database.

Once I noticed what was happening I cancelled the rest of the 600's that were on my machines, but there have to be a lot of them stuck in database limbo right now.

I personally don't care if I get credit for these or not, but it would be nice to get them cleared from pending status.

Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now
ID: 3757 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile alijay

Send message
Joined: 15 Apr 08
Posts: 55
Credit: 24,047
RAC: 0
Message 3758 - Posted: 12 Jun 2008, 22:12:43 UTC - in response to Message 3753.  

Ok, i've removed all the gs_600 from the database and stopped that search (so no more WUs should be set out there from gs_600).

I've started up gs_601, and i think i've found the error about why the search was generating nans in the parameter sets. let me know how the gs_601 WUs work.


I can't get any of the gs_601 on any of my comps :(


They are starting to come through now
ID: 3758 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[AF>Libristes>Debian] npetix

Send message
Joined: 22 May 08
Posts: 1
Credit: 2,052,834
RAC: 0
Message 3771 - Posted: 13 Jun 2008, 14:41:21 UTC

hi
i finish and report some gs_600_xxx succesfully
Aborted many to long computing and all other gs_600_xxx
waiting gs_60x_xxx
ID: 3771 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : new search

©2024 Astroinformatics Group