Message boards :
Number crunching :
bad wus in the database
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 11 Mar 08 Posts: 28 Credit: 818,194 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
I have work units starting with 3732, 606 and 607 here and everything seems to be fine. Thank you for the work you've put in to get everything running smoothly again. |
![]() Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
... that when the purge starts, it's so expensive that it slows down the rest of the system and can't catch up, while pretty much makes everything slow and unresponsive. so to get the purge done we have to stop the assimilator and work generation. i'll try and give this a shot and see if the server gets overloaded again. a day of WUs (at ~6 WUs a second) is quite a lot... which is part of the problem ![]() |
Send message Joined: 17 May 08 Posts: 16 Credit: 528,507 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
... that when the purge starts, it's so expensive that it slows down the rest of the system and can't catch up, while pretty much makes everything slow and unresponsive. so to get the purge done we have to stop the assimilator and work generation. Are you sure you want to do that just yet Travis? It's working really good right now. I'd sleep on it for the night, and celebrate Pint Night at the Ruck. :D :D :D :D |
Send message Joined: 18 Nov 07 Posts: 280 Credit: 2,442,757 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
i'll try and give this a shot and see if the server gets overloaded again. a day of WUs (at ~6 WUs a second) is quite a lot... which is part of the problem As long as you make a variable out of the, er.. completed WU retention time, you should just be able to start with something relatively short like an hour, then increase it if you think it can take more. Like Stefan Ver3 said, take it slow! We're all enjoying the current flow of WUs :) |
Send message Joined: 7 Sep 07 Posts: 444 Credit: 5,712,523 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
i'll try and give this a shot and see if the server gets overloaded again. a day of WUs (at ~6 WUs a second) is quite a lot... which is part of the problem I agree. Do we need 24 hours? A few hours would be nice for those who want to check. But what's the point of being able to check if there are no WUs to check? ;) |
![]() Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
i'll try and give this a shot and see if the server gets overloaded again. a day of WUs (at ~6 WUs a second) is quite a lot... which is part of the problem right now the purge function has it built only for days. if 1 day starts to make the server run slowly, i'll recode it for 3 or 4. right now things seem to be working fine so i'm hoping everything will be ok and WUs will be retained for a day. ![]() |
©2025 Astroinformatics Group