Welcome to MilkyWay@home

New Benchmark Thread - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new!


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : New Benchmark Thread - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new!
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 14 · Next

AuthorMessage
Arivald Ha'gel

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 14
Posts: 67
Credit: 160,074,149
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge5 year member badge
Message 61831 - Posted: 3 Jun 2014, 8:59:57 UTC

Hello,

I'm not mistaken :)

My cards are http://www.gigabyte.us/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4914#ov

Gigabyte Radeon R9 280X Windforce 3X Rev 2.0
I do underclock memory since it is not important for MilkyWay@Home, and this saves me some wattage, allows greater Core overclock cause of Power Limit, AND because of this it allows better cooling.

Setup:
AuthenticAMD AMD FX(tm)-8350 Eight-Core Processor [Family 21 Model 2 Stepping 0]
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00)
[2] AMD AMD Radeon HD 7870/7950/7970/R9 280X series (Tahiti) (3072MB) driver: 1.4.1848 OpenCL: 1.02

I have changed overclocking/underclocking to:
1150MHz Core, 1000MHz Memory with +20% Power Limit.
Current results are:
758340711 567225184 574003 3 Jun 2014, 8:37:56 UTC 3 Jun 2014, 8:55:51 UTC Completed and validated 23.09 1.83 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati)
758340186 567126374 574003 3 Jun 2014, 8:36:49 UTC 3 Jun 2014, 8:54:43 UTC Completed and validated 23.14 1.87 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati)
758340173 567212240 574003 3 Jun 2014, 8:36:49 UTC 3 Jun 2014, 8:54:43 UTC Completed and validated 23.10 1.90 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati)
758340162 566875173 574003 3 Jun 2014, 8:36:49 UTC 3 Jun 2014, 8:54:43 UTC Completed and validated 23.10 1.72 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati)
758340146 567222709 574003 3 Jun 2014, 8:36:49 UTC 3 Jun 2014, 8:53:36 UTC Completed and validated 23.09 1.86 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02

It does NOT hold 1150MHz Core clock (More likely oscillates around 1140MHz) since Power Limit is too small, but it is impossible to go over +20% in current Afterburner. With higher than 1000MHz Memory clock, it possibly wouldn't even hold 1100MHz Core clock.
With default 1500MHz Memory clock it is hard to maintain 1050MHz Core clock stability.

IMHO with better CPU this card is capable of saving one more second.
ID: 61831 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Arivald Ha'gel

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 14
Posts: 67
Credit: 160,074,149
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge5 year member badge
Message 61834 - Posted: 4 Jun 2014, 6:56:48 UTC

Hello,

I was "forced" to once again change clocks due to mentioned clock instability.
Currently cards are:
1125MHz Core
975MHz Memory

And they are running good, with core clock stable throughout the day. If anyone do not know what I'm talking about I can prepare screenshot of MSI Afterburner with seen clock instability due to power limitation.

Times are unchanged:
759065145 567747654 4 Jun 2014, 6:39:16 UTC 4 Jun 2014, 6:54:56 UTC Completed and validated 23.09 1.81 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati)
759065143 567747652 4 Jun 2014, 6:39:16 UTC 4 Jun 2014, 6:54:56 UTC Completed and validated 23.09 1.79 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati)
759064567 567747216 4 Jun 2014, 6:38:09 UTC 4 Jun 2014, 6:53:50 UTC Completed and validated 23.09 1.84 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati)
759064566 567747215 4 Jun 2014, 6:38:09 UTC 4 Jun 2014, 6:53:50 UTC Completed and validated 23.09 1.84 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati)
759064565 567747214 4 Jun 2014, 6:38:09 UTC 4 Jun 2014, 6:54:56 UTC Completed and validated 23.14 1.78 106.88 MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati)

Seems that GPU/CPU is synchronized on 1s boundary.
This could be improved. I think...?
ID: 61834 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 61835 - Posted: 4 Jun 2014, 19:06:34 UTC - in response to Message 61834.  
Last modified: 4 Jun 2014, 19:19:38 UTC

Yea underclocking grx RAM has little or no affect on MW, even with my HD 5850 halving RAM speeds to 500 MHz only added 1s to crunching the long 213.76 credit WUs (see the end of the old benchmarking thread). And despite raising the GPU from 725 to 850 MHz it still draws the standard amount of power as the default clocks thx to the RAM underclock :).

What do you mean by 1s boundary?

Anyway I'll add the 1125 MHz time to the AT chart now & MW 1 after a few more submitted times.
If I were you I'd underclock the RAM as much as possible & then see what the GPU could o/c to! :D
You're just shy of the No1 spot afterall ;)

DutchDK
Yea I know about the grx RAM & MW, see above ;), what I mean is that your GPU is ~7.7% higher clocked but is just ~4.6% faster. Although I suppose that few % gap could just largely be due to natural variance......
Having said that his 1125 MHz times seem to prove my point even more, lol.
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 61835 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Arivald Ha'gel

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 14
Posts: 67
Credit: 160,074,149
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge5 year member badge
Message 61836 - Posted: 4 Jun 2014, 20:01:51 UTC
Last modified: 4 Jun 2014, 20:53:03 UTC

I think that RAM on R9 280X cannot be underclocked below 150MHz below Core frequency... what I mean is that with:
Core 1100MHz, RAM cannot be lower than 950MHz. Well... perhaps it can, but on my MSI Afterburner when I tried that it went to 1500MHz...

With 1s boundary I meant that I have never seen unit completion time different than:
XX.YY where YY is a number from 04-20.
On current setup/freq I can see times 23.06 - 23.18... but ocasionally I see 24.08.
Like:
http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/result.php?resultid=759506557
http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/result.php?resultid=759506555

Workunit with 24.09s completion time is:
Integration time: 20.353996 s. Average time per iteration = 63.606238 ms
Integral 0 time = 20.700259 s
Running likelihood with 46395 stars
Likelihood time = 0.603571 s

20.70 + 0.60 = 21.3s

Workunit with 23.14 completion time is:
Integration time: 19.920776 s. Average time per iteration = 62.252425 ms
Integral 0 time = 20.267444 s
Running likelihood with 46395 stars
Likelihood time = 0.578617 s

20.2 + 0.57 = 20.77s

Difference is 530ms, but it is reported as almost 1s.
ID: 61836 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Arivald Ha'gel

Send message
Joined: 30 Apr 14
Posts: 67
Credit: 160,074,149
RAC: 0
100 million credit badge5 year member badge
Message 61837 - Posted: 4 Jun 2014, 21:03:21 UTC - in response to Message 61836.  

I also see possible improvement on CPU side (for my PC - sadly I have top AMD CPU).
My MilkyWay@Home tasks takes 1.7-1s.9s CPU time. (23.1s total)
My Short Separation take about 4.7-5.2s CPU time (26.1s-27.1s total).
My Long Separation task takes about 8.2-8.6s CPU time (49.1-50.1s total).

(noticed .1 pattern here?)

For GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz [Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9] (4 processors)
(current TOP 2) times are:
MilkyWay@Home 1.1s-1.65s.
Short Separation 2.1s-2.3s.
Long Separation 3.3s-3.3s.

So with better CPU Long Separation runs would be most "profitable" R280X.
Unless it is about CPU power saving features... I do not run CPU tasks at all, so my CPU is mostly saving than spending power. And It may need some time to bump up voltage & frequency.
ID: 61837 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 61838 - Posted: 4 Jun 2014, 22:28:27 UTC - in response to Message 61837.  
Last modified: 4 Jun 2014, 22:28:57 UTC

Ok thx, interesting.......
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 61838 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 63173 - Posted: 22 Feb 2015, 12:25:18 UTC

ttt
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 63173 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
tictoc
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 Dec 11
Posts: 16
Credit: 910,276,627
RAC: 1,397,712
500 million credit badge7 year member badge
Message 63236 - Posted: 15 Mar 2015, 17:48:22 UTC

Here are some more WU times.

OS: Windows 7 x64
BOINC Version: 7.4.36
GPU Driver: 14.9 WHQL
CPU: intel i7-4790k @ 4.6 Ghz
GPU: AMD HD7970 @ 1200/1550

20 WU avg run-time - 21.29s

OS: Windows 10 x64
BOINC Version: 7.4.36
GPU Driver: 14.9 WHQL
CPU: AMD x6 1055t @ 3.2 Ghz
GPU: AMD HD7970 @ 1200/1550

20 WU avg run-time - 23.74s

For the Windows 10 rig, I was initially running at 1175 Mhz on the packaged driver, which is 14.8 WHQL. I thought the older driver and slightly lower clock speed might be the reason for the longer run-times, so I updated to 14.9 WHQL (best driver for the majority of the projects I run).

After updating to 14.9, and pushing my core clock up to 1200 Mhz, the run-times are still about 2-2.5 seconds longer on Windows 10. It Looks like Windows 10, build 9926, is not quite as efficient as Windows 7 x64.
ID: 63236 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 63317 - Posted: 2 Apr 2015, 18:37:12 UTC
Last modified: 2 Apr 2015, 18:42:38 UTC

Sorry for the late reply tictoc, I think the email sub got buried :o, or there isn't 1. Anyway, thx for the times, you've posted a new fastest time :).

Btw are they standard 7970 or GHz edition versions? Either way, nice o/cs :)

Updated table :-

*******************************************************************************

Current GPU statistics ~ Average Run Time to Complete 1 MW v1.02 106.88 credit WU :-

HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, RAM 1550 MHz) .............. 21.3s ... tictoc (Win 7)
R9 280X (GPU 1185 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 23s ...... DutchDK
R9 280X (GPU 1125 MHz, RAM 975 MHz) ................ 23.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
R9 280X (GPU 1100MHz, RAM 1500 MHz) ............... 23.5s ... TennesseeTony
HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, 1550 MHz) ..................... 23.7s ... tictoc (Win 10, also a different PC)
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 950 MHz) ................ 24.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
HD 7950 (GPU 1188 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 24.1s ... GLeeM
R9 280X (GPU 1070 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 25s ...... WES
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 28.1s ... GLeeM
HD 7950 (GPU 925 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) ............... 31.2s ... salvorhardin
HD 7950 (GPU 900 MHz) ...................................... 33s ...... Tom*
HD 7950 (stock) .................................................. 39.8s ... Rudy Toody
HD 7950 (stock) .................................................. 42.8s ... wayliff
HD 5970 (GPU 900 MHz, RAM 1200 MHz) ................ 43.7s ... superpower
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 500 MHz) ............ 51s ..... Assimilator1
HD 5970 (GPU 735 MHz, RAM 1010) ...................... 52.6s ... superpower (dual GPU card)
HD 5850 (stock) .................................................. 60s ..... Assimilator1
GTX 980 (GPU 1417MHz, RAM 6000 MHz) .............. 130s .... Biodoc (Linux)
R9 m275 (stock) ................................................ 290s .... waffleironhead
GTX 690 (stock) ................................................. 394s .... S@NL - JBG (dual GPU card)
GTX 260 c216 (stock) ......................................... 454s ..... Assimilator1

Current CPU statistics ~ Average CPU Time to Complete 1 MW v1.0x 106.88 credit WU :-

Intel i7-5820K (o/c 4.1 GHz) ............................... 2055s ... TennesseeTony
Intel Xeon X5570 (Turboing to 3.2 GHz) ............... 3376s ... DutchDK
Intel i7-4702MQ @2.2GHz, (HT on) ...................... 6245s ... Maxwell
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 63317 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 63319 - Posted: 6 Apr 2015, 11:18:47 UTC
Last modified: 6 Apr 2015, 11:38:03 UTC

swiftmallard has PM'd me a time for his rig.

HD 5870 GPU 850 MHz, RAM 600 MHz - 46.18s

Pretty good :), not far off a stock 7950!
I'll add the time to a table here after a few more results, but I will add it to the AnandTech thread now (linked in my 2nd post).

******************************

tictoc
Could you do a 5 WU run with your 7970 at stock speeds?
We don't have any times for 7970s or 280Xs at stock speed atm ;)
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 63319 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDR4G00N

Send message
Joined: 24 Jun 14
Posts: 9
Credit: 71,203,364
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge5 year member badge
Message 63375 - Posted: 14 Apr 2015, 15:52:46 UTC
Last modified: 14 Apr 2015, 16:33:16 UTC

Here's the times for my main rig doing MilkyWay@Home v1.02 (opencl_amd_ati).

OS: Windows 8.1 Pro x64
BOINC Version: 7.4.36
GPU Driver: 15.4 Beta
CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 @ 4.1GHz
GPU 1&2: MSI TF R7950's @ 1080/1250

Averaging about 27 secs each,
though usually I run 2 tasks on each gpu at the same time to shave off a few seconds.

2 tasks per gpu time: 50-51 secs.

Second rig,
OS: Windows 8.1 Pro x64
BOINC Version: 7.4.36
GPU Driver: 14.12 WHQL
CPU: Intel i7-920 @ 2.66GHz
GPU: Sapphire HD 7950 OC (3L Rev.)@ 1050/1250

2 tasks per gpu time: 53 secs.
ID: 63375 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 63376 - Posted: 14 Apr 2015, 17:43:12 UTC - in response to Message 63375.  

Hi, thx for your times Dr4goon.

I'll certainly add the time for your main rig as you seemed to of run single tasks on that 1, but as per my benchmark req's I can't use dual task times as that can sometimes give widely fluctuating times (not always, but you can only know for certain when you have an average single WU time as a guide).
Anyway I'll add your main rig's time in the next day or 2 :).

****************************************************************************

Btw folks we're lacking any times for the 6900 & 3800 series, & only have 1 time for the 4800/4700 series (just in the AT thread atm), their aren't many Nvidia times either, would be nice to have a greater spread of GPU's.

Also would be nice to add some more CPU times! :)
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 63376 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDR4G00N

Send message
Joined: 24 Jun 14
Posts: 9
Credit: 71,203,364
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge5 year member badge
Message 63377 - Posted: 14 Apr 2015, 19:04:38 UTC - in response to Message 63376.  
Last modified: 14 Apr 2015, 19:04:52 UTC

Sorry about that, my second rig averages 29 sec for each task.

I might run some tasks through my xeon later and see what times I get.
ID: 63377 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
TLS

Send message
Joined: 13 Mar 13
Posts: 9
Credit: 11,225,530
RAC: 0
10 million credit badge6 year member badge
Message 63378 - Posted: 14 Apr 2015, 22:25:08 UTC
Last modified: 14 Apr 2015, 22:35:43 UTC

PC 1:
AMD Phenom 940 3 ghz - 1 hour and 18 minutes
Geforce 750 Ti - 7 minutes and 25 seconds (please dont laugh!!)

PC 2:
AMD X2 4600 2,4 Ghz - 2 hours and 43 minutes
AMD Radeon HD4830 - 2 minutes and 41 seconds
ID: 63378 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDR4G00N

Send message
Joined: 24 Jun 14
Posts: 9
Credit: 71,203,364
RAC: 0
50 million credit badge5 year member badge
Message 63381 - Posted: 15 Apr 2015, 16:34:01 UTC

X5650 @ 4.1GHz running 11 Milkyway@Home v1.00 tasks.
Average of 4,130 Seconds or 1Hr 8Mins per task.
ID: 63381 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 63383 - Posted: 15 Apr 2015, 18:02:54 UTC

Excellent, thanks for the times folks :)

And no worries Dr4goon :).
And I will finally be able to give a time for my C2Q, I had to force BOINC to get some WUs, grrr.

I'll post an updated table shortly.

TLS
I only laughed when I read 'please don't laugh' ;)
I'm surprised though that it's not much quicker than my GTX 260, I guess it's down to the 750's FP64 bigger divider (1/32), the 260's is 1/12th I believe.
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 63383 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 63384 - Posted: 15 Apr 2015, 18:27:02 UTC - in response to Message 63383.  

New table :).

Current GPU statistics ~ Average Run Time to Complete 1 MW v1.02 106.88 credit WU :-

HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, RAM 1550 MHz) .............. 21.3s ... tictoc (Win 7)
R9 280X (GPU 1185 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 23s ...... DutchDK
R9 280X (GPU 1125 MHz, RAM 975 MHz) ................ 23.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz) .............. 23.5s ... TennesseeTony
HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, 1550 MHz) ..................... 23.7s ... tictoc (Win 10, also a different PC)
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 950 MHz) ................ 24.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
HD 7950 (GPU 1188 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 24.1s ... GLeeM
HD 7970 GE (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM u/c 1375 MHz) .... 25s ...... DrPop
R9 280X (GPU 1070 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 25s ...... WES
HD 7950 (GPU 1080 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 27s ...... DR4GOON
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 28.1s ... GLeeM
HD 7950 (GPU 1050 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 29s ..... DR4GOON
HD 7950 (GPU 925 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) ............... 31.2s ... salvorhardin
HD 7950 (GPU 900 MHz) ...................................... 33s ...... Tom*
HD 7950 (stock) .................................................. 39.8s ... Rudy Toody
HD 7950 (stock) .................................................. 42.8s ... wayliff
HD 5970 (GPU 900 MHz, RAM 1200 MHz) ................ 43.7s ... superpower (dual GPU card)
HD 5870 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 600 MHz) ............ 46.2s ... swiftmallard
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 500 MHz) ............ 51s ..... Assimilator1
HD 5970 (GPU 735 MHz, RAM 1010) ...................... 52.6s ... superpower (dual GPU card)
HD 5850 (stock) .................................................. 60s ..... Assimilator1
HD 4850 (stock) ................................................. 121s .... TennesseeTony
GTX 980 (GPU 1417 MHz, RAM 6000 MHz) ............. 130s .... Biodoc (Linux)
HD 4830 (stock) ................................................. 161s .... TLS
GTX 970 (GPU 1114-1253 MHz) ........................... 165s .... Orange Kid
R9 m275 (stock) ................................................ 290s .... waffleironhead
GTX 690 (stock) ................................................. 394s .... S@NL - JBG (dual GPU card)
GTX 750 Ti (stock) ............................................. 445s ..... TLS
GTX 260 c216 (stock) ......................................... 454s ..... Assimilator1

Current CPU statistics ~ Average CPU Time to Complete 1 MW v1.0x 106.88 credit WU :-

Intel i7-5820K (o/c 4.1 GHz) ............................... 2055s ... TennesseeTony
Intel Xeon X5570 (Turboing to 3.2 GHz) ............... 3376s ... DutchDK
Intel Xeon 5650 (o/c 4.1 GHz) ............................. 4130s ... DR4GOON
AMD Phenom 940 (3 GHz) .................................. 4680s ... TLS
Intel i7-4702MQ @2.2GHz, (HT on) ...................... 6245s ... Maxwell
AMD X2 4600 (2.4 GHz) ...................................... 9780s ... TLS
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 63384 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
TLS

Send message
Joined: 13 Mar 13
Posts: 9
Credit: 11,225,530
RAC: 0
10 million credit badge6 year member badge
Message 63387 - Posted: 16 Apr 2015, 13:07:17 UTC - in response to Message 63383.  

No, thank you for the initiative. Its very interesting reading.

May I suggest that you update the table in the first post of this thread. I belive it will be easier for you and then also easy for others to find the last update.
ID: 63387 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 63389 - Posted: 16 Apr 2015, 17:34:21 UTC - in response to Message 63387.  
Last modified: 16 Apr 2015, 17:36:30 UTC

Err, as mentioned in my 1st post ;), the rubbish software they use for these forums allows no editing after 1 hr :(. Not even mods can do it apparently.

It certainly would be better to update the 1st post though, which is what I'm doing in the AnandTech thread & was doing in the SETI.USA & KWSN thread before I dropped doing updates there.

Oh & no probs :)
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 63389 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 11
Posts: 360
Credit: 42,274,497
RAC: 32
30 million credit badge8 year member badgeextraordinary contributions badge
Message 63390 - Posted: 16 Apr 2015, 17:44:50 UTC
Last modified: 16 Apr 2015, 17:48:07 UTC

3 times added to the table, my C2Q & 2 Nvidia cards by zzuupp.
Also a slightly revised benchmark requirement spec. & a partial table of some of the GPUs default clock speeds.

*****************************************************************************************************************

So please share your new scores for old & new GPUs & CPUs alike!

Please note new requirements for the benchmark :-

Validated 106.88 credit WUs only & must be from the MilkyWay@Home v1.0x app (the separation mod fit ones are slower. ~20s on my HD 5850 @850 MHz).

Average of 5 WU times (not cherry picked please! ;)).

A dedicated CPU core for each GPU.

Please state clock speeds if overclocked (including factory overclocks) or state 'stock'.

Please only crunch 1 WU at a time per GPU, otherwise it will massively increase WU time! (even if it does increase output, the WU times seem to fluctuate much more than singly crunched WUs so you can't 1/2 the time either).

For CPUs you'll want to crunch 1 WU per real core.

It would also be handy if you could state your BOINC & driver version & OS, incase it does make any odds.


************************************************************************************

Current GPU statistics ~ Average Run Time to Complete 1 MW v1.02 106.88 credit WU :-

HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, RAM 1550 MHz) .............. 21.3s ... tictoc (Win 7)
R9 280X (GPU 1185 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 23s ...... DutchDK
R9 280X (GPU 1125 MHz, RAM 975 MHz) ................ 23.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 1500 MHz) .............. 23.5s ... TennesseeTony
HD 7970 (GPU 1200 MHz, 1550 MHz) ..................... 23.7s ... tictoc (Win 10, also a different PC)
R9 280X (GPU 1100 MHz, RAM 950 MHz) ................ 24.1s ... Arivald Ha'gel
HD 7950 (GPU 1188 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 24.1s ... GLeeM
HD 7970 GE (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM u/c 1375 MHz) .... 25s ...... DrPop
R9 280X (GPU 1070 MHz, RAM 1600 MHz) .............. 25s ...... WES
HD 7950 (GPU 1080 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 27s ...... DR4GOON
HD 7950 (GPU 1000 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 28.1s ... GLeeM
HD 7950 (GPU 1050 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) .............. 29s ..... DR4GOON
HD 7950 (GPU 925 MHz, RAM 1250 MHz) ............... 31.2s ... salvorhardin
HD 7950 (GPU 900 MHz) ...................................... 33s ...... Tom*
HD 7950 (stock) .................................................. 39.8s ... Rudy Toody
HD 7950 (stock) .................................................. 42.8s ... wayliff
HD 5970 (GPU 900 MHz, RAM 1200 MHz) ................ 43.7s ... superpower (dual GPU card)
HD 5870 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 600 MHz) ............ 46.2s ... swiftmallard
HD 5850 (GPU 850 MHz, RAM u/c 500 MHz) ............ 51s ..... Assimilator1
HD 5970 (GPU 735 MHz, RAM 1010) ...................... 52.6s ... superpower (dual GPU card)
HD 5850 (stock) .................................................. 60s ..... Assimilator1
HD 4850 (stock) ................................................. 121s .... TennesseeTony
GTX 980 (GPU 1417 MHz, RAM 6000 MHz) ............. 130s .... Biodoc (Linux)
HD 4830 (stock) ................................................. 161s .... TLS
GTX 970 (GPU 1114-1253 MHz) ........................... 165s .... Orange Kid
GTX 560 Ti (stock) ............................................. 252s .... zzuupp
R9 m275 (stock) ................................................ 290s .... waffleironhead
GTX 670 (stock) ................................................. 363s .... zzuupp
GTX 690 (stock) ................................................. 394s .... S@NL - JBG (dual GPU card)
GTX 750 Ti (stock) ............................................. 445s ..... TLS
GTX 260 c216 (stock) ......................................... 454s ..... Assimilator1

Current CPU statistics ~ Average CPU Time to Complete 1 MW v1.0x 106.88 credit WU :-

Intel i7-5820K (o/c 4.1 GHz) ............................... 2055s ... TennesseeTony
Intel C2Q Q9550 (o/c 3.6 GHz) ............................ 3159s ... Assimilator1
Intel Xeon X5570 (Turboing to 3.2 GHz) ............... 3376s ... DutchDK
Intel Xeon X5650 (o/c 4.1 GHz) ........................... 4130s ... DR4GOON
AMD Phenom 940 (3 GHz) .................................. 4680s ... TLS
Intel i7-4702MQ @2.2GHz, (HT on) ...................... 6245s ... Maxwell
AMD X2 4600 (2.4 GHz) ...................................... 9780s ... TLS

************************************************************************************

Further info.

For reference, link to my 1st MW benchmark AnandTech thread.

Stock clocks for the above o/ced graphic cards (GPU/RAM MHz):-

HD 5850 ...................... 725/1000
HD 5870 ...................... 850/1200
HD 5970 ...................... 725/1000 (dual GPU)
HD 7950 ...................... 800/1250
HD 7950 Boost ............. 850-925/1250
HD 7970 ...................... 925/1375
HD 7970 GE ................. 1000-1050/1500
R9 280X ...................... 850-1000/1500

As usual this forum has busted all the links :/
Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, Einstein@H, DHEP.

Main rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, RX 580 8 GB, 16 GB DDR3 1866, Win 7 64bit
2nd rig - Q9550 @3.6 GHz, HD 7870 XT 3GB(DS), 8 GB DDR2 1066, Win 7 64bit
ID: 63390 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 14 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : New Benchmark Thread - times wanted for any hardware, CPU or GPU, old or new!

©2019 Astroinformatics Group