new WUs

Author	Message
Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 9777 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:23:22 UTC Work should be flowing now. Some of you might have had some files not found errors but those should all be fixed now. ID: 9777 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 9779 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:26:30 UTC Got 1. Is the limit still 12? Or just short on wu's? Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 9779 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 9780 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:28:16 UTC - in response to Message 9779. Got 1. Is the limit still 12? Or just short on wu's? Will be short on WUs for a bit until some get reported. I manually started a bunch, but the assimilator won't know about the running searches until some come back :) Chances are there's a lot of really hungry boxes out there gobbling up the ones I do make as fast as they get out there. ID: 9780 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 9781 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:29:15 UTC - in response to Message 9780. Feed the hampster...need to get him running. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 9781 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 9782 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:30:40 UTC - in response to Message 9781. Feed the hampster...need to get him running. I threw a couple more carrots into the cage. hopefully that'll get him excited :) ID: 9782 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Misfit Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 915 Credit: 1,503,319 RAC: 0	Message 9783 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:30:57 UTC I had to dump some cosmos to pick up work. Got my own limit of 24. me@rescam.org ID: 9783 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 9786 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:37:01 UTC - in response to Message 9783. I had to dump some cosmos to pick up work. Got my own limit of 24. Yeah, Hammy the Hamster has that old gleam in his eye again. You should see that hamster wheel turn! ID: 9786 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Misfit Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 915 Credit: 1,503,319 RAC: 0	Message 9790 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:38:51 UTC - in response to Message 9786. I had to dump some cosmos to pick up work. Got my own limit of 24. Yeah, Hammy the Hamster has that old gleam in his eye again. You should see that hamster wheel turn! Is it made of metal or one of those cheap plastic Habitrail things? me@rescam.org ID: 9790 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 9791 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:41:05 UTC - in response to Message 9786. I had to dump some cosmos to pick up work. Got my own limit of 24. Yeah, Hammy the Hamster has that old gleam in his eye again. You should see that hamster wheel turn! Musta been sick the last two days huh. Gotta pay for the electric bill... Got my 12 wu's. Then crashed: 2/6/2009 9:37:18 PM\|Milkyway@home\|Finished download of /stars-82.txt 2/6/2009 9:37:18 PM\|Milkyway@home\|[error] MD5 check failed for /stars-82.txt 2/6/2009 9:37:18 PM\|Milkyway@home\|[error] expected 49c31e6d724772838c734817b7ac113e, got 798817981b84182b99faf9c1cb6fe75e 2/6/2009 9:37:18 PM\|Milkyway@home\|[error] Checksum or signature error for /stars-82.txt 79's & 86's run ok so far. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 9791 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 9792 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:42:49 UTC Last modified: 7 Feb 2009, 2:43:10 UTC Where did the credit go? Down to crumbs now. ~20 2 days ago, to ~3 now? Time to stop again. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 9792 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Labbie Send message Joined: 29 Aug 07 Posts: 327 Credit: 116,463,193 RAC: 0	Message 9794 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:44:25 UTC Was just going to say the same thing Bandit. something's wrong with the multiplier or something. Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now ID: 9794 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 9795 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:46:54 UTC - in response to Message 9791. I had to dump some cosmos to pick up work. Got my own limit of 24. Yeah, Hammy the Hamster has that old gleam in his eye again. You should see that hamster wheel turn! Musta been sick the last two days huh. Gotta pay for the electric bill... Got my 12 wu's. Then crashed: 2/6/2009 9:37:18 PM\|Milkyway@home\|Finished download of /stars-82.txt 2/6/2009 9:37:18 PM\|Milkyway@home\|[error] MD5 check failed for /stars-82.txt 2/6/2009 9:37:18 PM\|Milkyway@home\|[error] expected 49c31e6d724772838c734817b7ac113e, got 798817981b84182b99faf9c1cb6fe75e 2/6/2009 9:37:18 PM\|Milkyway@home\|[error] Checksum or signature error for /stars-82.txt 79's & 86's run ok so far. New WUs hopefully should fix this problem. ID: 9795 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Glenn Rogers Send message Joined: 4 Jul 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 364,966 RAC: 0	Message 9796 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:47:04 UTC - in response to Message 9786. What about the 24 wu i just reported do we get credit for the ones from before your system crashed? ID: 9796 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Labbie Send message Joined: 29 Aug 07 Posts: 327 Credit: 116,463,193 RAC: 0	Message 9797 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:48:24 UTC - in response to Message 9796. What about the 24 wu i just reported do we get credit for the ones from before your system crashed? Nope, it's been answered several times in this thread. Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now ID: 9797 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 9798 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:48:46 UTC - in response to Message 9796. What about the 24 wu i just reported do we get credit for the ones from before your system crashed? Unfortunately I don't think so, since we had to wipe the entire result and workunit tables from the database :( We'll be working on something to make sure this doesn't happen again. ID: 9798 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 9800 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:53:29 UTC - in response to Message 9794. Was just going to say the same thing Bandit. something's wrong with the multiplier or something. Feel like this... & in a way this for the missed credit for the turned in ones... Though that is more fitting for those with numerous systems. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 9800 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 9806 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:58:10 UTC - in response to Message 9800. If anything, the credit granted from the new searches, nm_x_r<1-5> should be higher than the older searches. ID: 9806 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Misfit Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 915 Credit: 1,503,319 RAC: 0	Message 9807 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:58:36 UTC - in response to Message 9800. What you are seeing there is what SETI calls "radar interference". me@rescam.org ID: 9807 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 9808 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:59:07 UTC - in response to Message 9806. If anything, the credit granted from the new searches, nm_x_r<1-5> should be higher than the older searches. Nope, ~20 down to ~3.5-4 Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 9808 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 9809 - Posted: 7 Feb 2009, 2:59:17 UTC - in response to Message 9807. Last modified: 7 Feb 2009, 2:59:29 UTC What you are seeing there is what SETI calls "radar interference". I think that's what happened to our database... ID: 9809 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote