started new searches r11-15

Author	Message
Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 10575 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 0:19:48 UTC Ok, I started new searches (with fresh parameter files and star files), trying to figure out why some people are getting md5 checksum errors and other things. Let me know if any of these are causing any problems. thanks! ID: 10575 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Cori Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 647 Credit: 27,592,547 RAC: 0	Message 10581 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 0:35:45 UTC Last modified: 14 Feb 2009, 0:36:59 UTC Looks good so far: 14.02.2009 01:29:38\|Milkyway@home\|Scheduler request completed: got 4 new tasks 14.02.2009 01:29:40\|Milkyway@home\|Started download of parameters-86-r11.txt 14.02.2009 01:29:40\|Milkyway@home\|Started download of stars-86-v3.txt 14.02.2009 01:29:40\|Milkyway@home\|Started download of nm_s86_r11_search_parameters_1432_1234571279 14.02.2009 01:29:40\|Milkyway@home\|Started download of nm_s86_r11_search_parameters_1433_1234571279 14.02.2009 01:29:40\|Milkyway@home\|Started download of nm_s86_r11_search_parameters_1434_1234571279 14.02.2009 01:29:40\|Milkyway@home\|Started download of nm_s86_r11_search_parameters_1435_1234571279 14.02.2009 01:29:41\|Milkyway@home\|Finished download of parameters-86-r11.txt 14.02.2009 01:29:41\|Milkyway@home\|Finished download of nm_s86_r11_search_parameters_1432_1234571279 14.02.2009 01:29:41\|Milkyway@home\|Finished download of nm_s86_r11_search_parameters_1433_1234571279 14.02.2009 01:29:41\|Milkyway@home\|Finished download of nm_s86_r11_search_parameters_1434_1234571279 14.02.2009 01:29:41\|Milkyway@home\|Finished download of nm_s86_r11_search_parameters_1435_1234571279 14.02.2009 01:29:49\|Milkyway@home\|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 149959 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 14.02.2009 01:29:52\|Milkyway@home\|Finished download of stars-86-v3.txt Also other new parameter and star files on my other boxes have been downloaded successfully. Now I have to crunch them all, but I guess all will be fine. ;-) Lovely greetings, Cori ID: 10581 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 10589 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 0:52:27 UTC Last modified: 14 Feb 2009, 1:47:38 UTC @ Travis - Is there any of the star-files that can be deleted? I have these in Boinc: test21 stars, stars, stars-79, stars86-cut, stars82, stars_nm_stripe79, stars_nm_stripe79 1, stars_nm_stripe79 r2, stars_nm_stripe79 r6, stars_nm_stripe79 r7, stars_nm_stripe82 1, stars_nm_stripe82 r2, stars_nm_stripe82 r5, stars_nm_stripe86 1, stars_nm_stripe86 r2, stars_nm_stripe86 r6, stars_nm_stripe86 r7, stars_nm_test25, stars_nm_test26 edit also stars79 v3 & stars82 v3 with the last searches. This should cancel out these atleast right?: stars-79, stars82 Just thought I'd try to clean boinc up a bit. Nothing ever seems to delete normally. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 10589 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

msattler Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 288 Credit: 5,474,012 RAC: 0	Message 10591 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 0:54:21 UTC - in response to Message 10589. @ Travis - Is there any of the star-files that can be deleted? I have these in Boinc: test21 stars, stars, stars-79, stars86-cut, stars82, stars_nm_stripe79, stars_nm_stripe79 1, stars_nm_stripe79 r2, stars_nm_stripe79 r6, stars_nm_stripe79 r7, stars_nm_stripe82 1, stars_nm_stripe82 r2, stars_nm_stripe82 r5, stars_nm_stripe86 1, stars_nm_stripe86 r2, stars_nm_stripe86 r6, stars_nm_stripe86 r7, stars_nm_test25, stars_nm_test26 Just thought I'd try to clean boinc up a bit. Nothing ever seems to delete normally. I was wondering about that myself earlier today....will all these files just continue to accumulate and take up HD space, or does MW clean them up itself.... You may have just answered the question...... I am the Kittyman. Please visit and give a Click for Seti City. ID: 10591 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 10593 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 0:56:51 UTC - in response to Message 10591. @ Travis - Is there any of the star-files that can be deleted? I have these in Boinc: test21 stars, stars, stars-79, stars86-cut, stars82, stars_nm_stripe79, stars_nm_stripe79 1, stars_nm_stripe79 r2, stars_nm_stripe79 r6, stars_nm_stripe79 r7, stars_nm_stripe82 1, stars_nm_stripe82 r2, stars_nm_stripe82 r5, stars_nm_stripe86 1, stars_nm_stripe86 r2, stars_nm_stripe86 r6, stars_nm_stripe86 r7, stars_nm_test25, stars_nm_test26 Just thought I'd try to clean boinc up a bit. Nothing ever seems to delete normally. I was wondering about that myself earlier today....will all these files just continue to accumulate and take up HD space, or does MW clean them up itself.... You may have just answered the question...... I haven't notice MW delete them, Rosetta will build up for awhile and then go down a bit. So I think it may. I think I deleted some before when the old serches were given up. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 10593 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

msattler Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 288 Credit: 5,474,012 RAC: 0	Message 10595 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 1:04:42 UTC - in response to Message 10593. @ Travis - Is there any of the star-files that can be deleted? I have these in Boinc: test21 stars, stars, stars-79, stars86-cut, stars82, stars_nm_stripe79, stars_nm_stripe79 1, stars_nm_stripe79 r2, stars_nm_stripe79 r6, stars_nm_stripe79 r7, stars_nm_stripe82 1, stars_nm_stripe82 r2, stars_nm_stripe82 r5, stars_nm_stripe86 1, stars_nm_stripe86 r2, stars_nm_stripe86 r6, stars_nm_stripe86 r7, stars_nm_test25, stars_nm_test26 Just thought I'd try to clean boinc up a bit. Nothing ever seems to delete normally. I was wondering about that myself earlier today....will all these files just continue to accumulate and take up HD space, or does MW clean them up itself.... You may have just answered the question...... I haven't notice MW delete them, Rosetta will build up for awhile and then go down a bit. So I think it may. I think I deleted some before when the old serches were given up. Maybe Travis can chime in and tell us how it is supposed to work..... I am the Kittyman. Please visit and give a Click for Seti City. ID: 10595 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Cappy [Team Musketeers] Send message Joined: 3 Oct 07 Posts: 71 Credit: 33,212,009 RAC: 0	Message 10597 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 1:09:33 UTC i went in a deleted them ALL yesterday and didnt have a problem other then the ones talked about in the other thread... if any of them are needed Boinc will just re-download them :) so i did it on every machine i have :) figured their just taking up space and was wondering anyway if any of these old files were the problem but they werent... ID: 10597 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 10598 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 1:11:11 UTC - in response to Message 10597. i went in a deleted them ALL yesterday and didnt have a problem other then the ones talked about in the other thread... if any of them are needed Boinc will just re-download them :) so i did it on every machine i have :) figured their just taking up space and was wondering anyway if any of these old files were the problem but they werent... Yea, I've done that with rosetta before, just trying to save the re-download. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 10598 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

msattler Send message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 288 Credit: 5,474,012 RAC: 0	Message 10599 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 1:17:10 UTC - in response to Message 10597. i went in a deleted them ALL yesterday and didnt have a problem other then the ones talked about in the other thread... if any of them are needed Boinc will just re-download them :) so i did it on every machine i have :) figured their just taking up space and was wondering anyway if any of these old files were the problem but they werent... Easy enough fix I guess, if MW does not clean them up itself..... I am the Kittyman. Please visit and give a Click for Seti City. ID: 10599 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Phil Send message Joined: 13 Feb 08 Posts: 1124 Credit: 46,740 RAC: 0	Message 10604 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 1:53:53 UTC - in response to Message 10593. Last modified: 14 Feb 2009, 1:55:41 UTC @ Travis - Is there any of the star-files that can be deleted? I have these in Boinc: test21 stars, stars, stars-79, stars86-cut, stars82, stars_nm_stripe79, stars_nm_stripe79 1, stars_nm_stripe79 r2, stars_nm_stripe79 r6, stars_nm_stripe79 r7, stars_nm_stripe82 1, stars_nm_stripe82 r2, stars_nm_stripe82 r5, stars_nm_stripe86 1, stars_nm_stripe86 r2, stars_nm_stripe86 r6, stars_nm_stripe86 r7, stars_nm_test25, stars_nm_test26 Just thought I'd try to clean boinc up a bit. Nothing ever seems to delete normally. I was wondering about that myself earlier today....will all these files just continue to accumulate and take up HD space, or does MW clean them up itself.... You may have just answered the question...... I haven't notice MW delete them, Rosetta will build up for awhile and then go down a bit. So I think it may. I think I deleted some before when the old serches were given up. Theyre sticky, they'll sit there. They use the mechanism invented for Einstein@Home. But only a couple megabytes, surely? Travis can issue a DELETE if he wants to. ID: 10604 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 10606 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 1:56:32 UTC - in response to Message 10604. But only a couple megabytes, surely? ~72 mb. Not a lot no, but unused junk can go. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 10606 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Phil Send message Joined: 13 Feb 08 Posts: 1124 Credit: 46,740 RAC: 0	Message 10607 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 2:00:27 UTC - in response to Message 10606. Last modified: 14 Feb 2009, 2:01:24 UTC But only a couple megabytes, surely? ~72 mb. Not a lot no, but unused junk can go. JEEZ! You've dutifully kept all that lot since the project was invented, without EVER detaching..... [edit]Aah, thats not per machine, tho?[/edit] ID: 10607 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 10608 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 2:04:32 UTC - in response to Message 10607. But only a couple megabytes, surely? ~72 mb. Not a lot no, but unused junk can go. JEEZ! You've dutifully kept all that lot since the project was invented, without EVER detaching..... Have reset before, not needed to detach. Had some Nano junk still left awhile back. :P Hadn't looked through it in awhile untill the opti apps here came about. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 10608 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Mr Mystery Send message Joined: 21 Nov 08 Posts: 90 Credit: 2,601 RAC: 0	Message 10614 - Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 2:23:59 UTC Last modified: 14 Feb 2009, 2:24:28 UTC Got a set of R12 and R15 fresh, lets see. ID: 10614 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote