ps_s22_X and ps_s23_X
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ps_s22_X and ps_s23_X
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 TravisSend message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0   |
We started up some new searches for these streams, so let us know how they're crunching here. 
|
|
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0  
|
A bunch of ps_s22s came through, and the odd ps_s23. The _s22s will be being crunched shortly, so I can see how they go with the new purge time running. |
|
Travis Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
A bunch of ps_s22s came through, and the odd ps_s23. The _s22s will be being crunched shortly, so I can see how they go with the new purge time running. ps_s22_7 and ps_s23_7 are a little weird, they might have pretty short crunch times. ps_s22_8 and ps_s23_8 should be a little bit longer than the s20 and s21s.
|
|
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0
|
Looks like these WUs are being processed OK, and receiving credit at the higher rate (longer crunch times) |
|
Send message Joined: 10 Feb 09 Posts: 13 Credit: 1,704,492 RAC: 0 
|
Looks like these WUs are being processed OK, and receiving credit at the higher rate (longer crunch times) WU completed. It took 495.678 seconds CPU time and 599.881 seconds wall clock time @ 2.49972 GHz. Not so bad, but It took my machine little bit more time and I recieved same credit almost :/ |
©2026 Astroinformatics Group