Message boards :
Number crunching :
resetting credit
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Aug 07 Posts: 20 Credit: 36,099 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
I agree, When dealing with Credits the topic is always an active one. 2 per work unit will give users a better return than the one did. Now how do I get one of those special ones for 700K credits though ? LoL.... G^R |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 31 Credit: 123,621 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
On another note, I've upped the credit per WU to 2.0, because the average credit seemed to be closer to 2 than 1. I'll try and figure out how to fix the credit already granted. Ok, I suppose that is ok, how ever this should not just be for the top 20 but for everybody in that case. Nobody should be favoured, No exceptions !!! ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
On another note, I've upped the credit per WU to 2.0, because the average credit seemed to be closer to 2 than 1. I'll try and figure out how to fix the credit already granted. credit is granted based on the volume being calculated at the moment, so for now it should be 2.0 per workunit for everyone. this'll be different when the volume size is changed, and when nate updates the code to do the "convolution" which is a lot more computationally intensive. but for now its 2.0 for everyone. once the server gets working and the binaries are updated i'll go through the database and fix the credit for people who got some wrong values (ie, 1000+ credit for a wu). |
©2025 Astroinformatics Group