ps_sgr_test_* and ps_sgr_10_1s

Author	Message
John Vickers Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 11 May 09 Posts: 30 Credit: 81,093 RAC: 0	Message 24103 - Posted: 3 Jun 2009, 23:28:24 UTC Last modified: 3 Jun 2009, 23:59:41 UTC Hello MilkyWay@Home, As you may or may not know, I am a new scientist working with BOINC. In the past half hour I have started a number of runs attempting to verify that I can in fact do it. I've been having some weird issues for the past week but I think I've figured everything out. these ps_sgr_test_* files are from that. ps_sgr_10_1s_1 is an actual scientific run, but I accidentally set the integral size to be too small so when you get workunits from that you will probably run into the frustration mentioned in this thread ( http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=878#24047 ). I apologize for that and will try to get that run ended as soon as possible. Thanks for your patience, John Vickers ID: 24103 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

[B^S] Beremat Send message Joined: 19 Feb 09 Posts: 33 Credit: 1,134,826 RAC: 0	Message 24111 - Posted: 4 Jun 2009, 0:20:06 UTC - in response to Message 24103. Hello MilkyWay@Home, As you may or may not know, I am a new scientist working with BOINC. In the past half hour I have started a number of runs attempting to verify that I can in fact do it. I've been having some weird issues for the past week but I think I've figured everything out. these ps_sgr_test_* files are from that. ps_sgr_10_1s_1 is an actual scientific run, but I accidentally set the integral size to be too small so when you get workunits from that you will probably run into the frustration mentioned in this thread ( http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/forum_thread.php?id=878#24047 ). I apologize for that and will try to get that run ended as soon as possible. Thanks for your patience, John Vickers That's for your work with the project, it is really appreciated. ID: 24111 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

arkayn Send message Joined: 14 Feb 09 Posts: 999 Credit: 74,932,619 RAC: 0	Message 24133 - Posted: 4 Jun 2009, 9:08:04 UTC Funny thing is I got credit for a couple of the test files. ID: 24133 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Blue Northern Software Send message Joined: 30 Jan 09 Posts: 56 Credit: 85,464 RAC: 0	Message 24139 - Posted: 4 Jun 2009, 11:36:17 UTC - in response to Message 24103. I apologize for that and will try to get that run ended as soon as possible. Thanks for your patience, John Vickers Shoot, it's no big thing. I made a mistake once myself. ID: 24139 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

mycal Send message Joined: 13 Jan 08 Posts: 19 Credit: 820,482 RAC: 0	Message 24364 - Posted: 6 Jun 2009, 8:06:13 UTC Good morning all. What does this mean please? Another way of saying no work 06/06/2009 08:44:34 Milkyway@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 06/06/2009 08:44:34 Milkyway@home Message from server: No work sent 06/06/2009 08:44:34 Milkyway@home Message from server: CPU app exists for MilkyWay@Home but no CPU work requested Michael ID: 24364 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 24379 - Posted: 6 Jun 2009, 11:54:55 UTC - in response to Message 24364. Good morning all. What does this mean please? Another way of saying no work 06/06/2009 08:44:34 Milkyway@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 06/06/2009 08:44:34 Milkyway@home Message from server: No work sent 06/06/2009 08:44:34 Milkyway@home Message from server: CPU app exists for MilkyWay@Home but no CPU work requested Michael It is saying that your GPU is asking for work and not your cpu. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 24379 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ps_sgr_test_* and ps_sgr_10_1s_1