Message boards :
Number crunching :
Compute Errors
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 12 Dec 08 Posts: 56 Credit: 269,889,439 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
I have had a few over 4 different 3850 cards, but am not really worrying about it...Probably over 99% have completed sucessully... Click to help Seti City. ![]() ![]() |
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
CPUs are having invalid results as well. My old dual P3 has 1 in 4 results returned here. Go away, I was asleep ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 22 Nov 08 Posts: 136 Credit: 319,414,799 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
I'm still getting quite a few. Maybe around 5%, that's still alot as far as the project goes. Somebody may want to look at why it's happening. That could be quite alot of work on the grand scale that will be missing if not corrected. Insta purge isn't helping any. If they could see why the're failing it would help. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Aug 07 Posts: 327 Credit: 116,463,193 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
I'm now showing 7 on my CPU machine that were not there this morning. ![]() Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Feb 09 Posts: 109 Credit: 11,089,510 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
If the rare invalid result is occurring on both CPU and GPU crunched tasks, perhaps there is still a fundamental issue with some of the new work we're getting. I see a small percentage of my work report as invalid as well. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Dec 07 Posts: 1947 Credit: 240,884,648 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
I'm seeing approx 10% failure rate on my 4870. |
![]() Send message Joined: 31 Dec 08 Posts: 9 Credit: 1,338,590 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
It seems overnight all my 2s_2 have been marked as invalid (Have had 5 of them). All on cpu. No problems with the other searches. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Dec 07 Posts: 1947 Credit: 240,884,648 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
My work E6850 (cpu) has about a 5% to 10% error rate. |
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
The error rate on my 3850 seems to have disappeared, but risen on the CPUs to about 5%. Go away, I was asleep ![]() ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 20 Sep 08 Posts: 1391 Credit: 203,563,566 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
My card is not getting any errors since updating to 0.19f, but my CPU's are hardly getting any work at all so I can't comment on them. The last 2s unit that errored out resulted in 3 screens worth of debugging information in the output file. If anyone wants it I'll pass it on. Hopefully when the GPU project is able to start up all this will go away. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Dec 07 Posts: 1947 Credit: 240,884,648 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Just a few of the invalid wu's from my 4870 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73584677 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73571669 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73544740 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73544745 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73571652 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73571666 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73571667 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73544733 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73501652 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73501661 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73544733 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73544740 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73544745 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73571652 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73571667 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73571666 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73571669 And a couple from my cpu http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73422247 http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=73422257 |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Apr 08 Posts: 1415 Credit: 2,716,428 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Yep I've got a few invalid Wu's too, all are 2_2's. ;-( |
![]() Send message Joined: 22 Dec 07 Posts: 51 Credit: 2,405,016 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Yep I've got a few invalid Wu's too, all are 2_2's. Me too - all CPU - all 2_2s. Seejay **Proud Member and Founder of BOINC Team Allprojectstats.com** ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 11 May 09 Posts: 30 Credit: 81,093 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Hello MW@Home, Can you please tell me if these _2s_2 runs that were returning errors are all "ps_sgr_208_2s_2", all "ps_sgr_235_2s_1" or a mix of both? Thank You, John Vickers Edit: typo: "ps_sgr_235_2s_2" - > "ps_sgr_235_2s_1" |
Send message Joined: 21 Aug 08 Posts: 625 Credit: 558,425 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Hello MW@Home, It would help somewhat if the purge delay could be increased some more, that way there would be more results for people to look through to find an answer to your question. Alternatively, you could write a SQL query to run against the results database periodically to gather the data from your side. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Hello MW@Home, From what i've seen only "ps_sgr_208_2s_2" cause errors. ![]() Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
Send message Joined: 26 Jul 08 Posts: 627 Credit: 94,940,203 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Can you please tell me if these _2s_2 runs that were returning errors are all "ps_sgr_208_2s_2", all "ps_sgr_235_2s_2" or a mix of both? Most of the invalid WUs are ps_sgr_208_2s_2 ones, with a few ps_sgr_235_2s_1 amongst them (ratio 15:1 or so). I haven't found a single failed ps_sgr_235_2s_2 WU (in about 900 I looked at). I would think the outlier detection may be too picky for some of the WUs, that means also some correct results get rejected. |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Nov 08 Posts: 14 Credit: 180,768,799 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Hello MW@Home, In my case, invalid WU´s (with returning error) are ps_sgr_235_2s_1 and ps_sgr_208_2s_2 (most cases). Also, no failed ps_sgr_235_2s_2 found. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 22 Nov 08 Posts: 136 Credit: 319,414,799 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
These are the ones I could get before insta purge took care of them. Host 39176 GPU ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1637698_1244467419 ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1637697_1244467419 ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1637695_1244467419_0 ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1624691_1244465356_0 ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1615716_1244463950 ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1615702_1244463950_0 Host 60779 GPU ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1641829_1244468066 ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1628695_1244465990 ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1628692_1244465990 ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1623219_1244465117 ps_sgr_235_2s_1_1572923_1244457187 ps_sgr_208_2s_2_308822_1244201732 Host 39247 CPU ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1598226_1244461206 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 12 Dec 08 Posts: 56 Credit: 269,889,439 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
These are the ones I could get before insta purge took care of them. All but one of my 0 credits have come on the 208_2s_2 WUs as well...too bad instapurge will get them shortly...I didn't see any in the most recent results... Click to help Seti City. ![]() ![]() |
©2023 Astroinformatics Group