New sgr WUs slower on P4?

Author	Message
WimTea Send message Joined: 16 Nov 07 Posts: 23 Credit: 4,774,710 RAC: 0	Message 24362 - Posted: 6 Jun 2009, 7:57:36 UTC My good ol' P4 1.8 seems to take about twice as long for s1 and s2 sgr WUs than for the comparable short and long ones we had before. This is also reflected in the credits claimed. My Q9550 however seems to take only marginally longer than before. Anyone have the same results? And/or info on why this increase seems to affect my P4 only? ID: 24362 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Alinator Send message Joined: 7 Jun 08 Posts: 464 Credit: 56,639,936 RAC: 0	Message 24386 - Posted: 6 Jun 2009, 15:09:32 UTC Hmmm... I have a 2.66 Northie, and I'm not seeing any appreciable difference in the runtimes between the sgr tasks and the older ps searches. They all seem to be within the usual task to task variation so far. Alinator ID: 24386 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

nick n Send message Joined: 16 Mar 09 Posts: 21 Credit: 52,815 RAC: 0	Message 24396 - Posted: 6 Jun 2009, 19:54:28 UTC Well it seems a bit slower but nothing to extreme. ID: 24396 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

skivelitis Send message Joined: 29 Jun 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 252,697 RAC: 0	Message 24397 - Posted: 6 Jun 2009, 20:13:17 UTC - in response to Message 24396. Seem way slower on my P4 2.4 Ghz. Credits have dropped by about 50% ID: 24397 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 24401 - Posted: 6 Jun 2009, 20:36:15 UTC I've had one so far and the credit was close to other wu's for the same time. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 24401 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote