Credits

Author	Message
skivelitis Send message Joined: 29 Jun 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 252,697 RAC: 0	Message 24382 - Posted: 6 Jun 2009, 13:45:16 UTC Have seen my credits fall from 18/hr to under 10 with sgr work units. Anyone else? ID: 24382 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Bob in FL Send message Joined: 19 Jul 08 Posts: 5 Credit: 2,547,855 RAC: 0	Message 24519 - Posted: 7 Jun 2009, 23:30:37 UTC Last modified: 7 Jun 2009, 23:31:13 UTC I'm seeing the occasional 0.00 credit for ps_sgr_208... work units. It is often enough that I can see a change in my RAC but my change is not as significant as you report. I'm running CPU only. ID: 24519 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

bobgoblin Send message Joined: 8 Dec 07 Posts: 60 Credit: 67,028,931 RAC: 0	Message 24520 - Posted: 7 Jun 2009, 23:41:31 UTC - in response to Message 24519. I'm seeing the occasional 0.00 credit for ps_sgr_208... work units. It is often enough that I can see a change in my RAC but my change is not as significant as you report. I'm running CPU only. i've had a handful do the same: Task ID 74982228 Name ps_sgr_208_2s_2_1284325_1244411529_0 Workunit 73863811 Created 7 Jun 2009 21:52:14 UTC Sent 7 Jun 2009 21:54:19 UTC Received 7 Jun 2009 21:57:07 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 41037 Report deadline 10 Jun 2009 21:54:19 UTC CPU time 29.11299 stderr out <core_client_version>6.6.20</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Running Milkyway@home ATI GPU application version 0.19f by Gipsel CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz (8 cores/threads) 2.65999 GHz (925ms) CAL Runtime: 1.3.158 Found 1 CAL device Device 0: ATI Radeon HD 4800 (RV770) 512 MB local RAM (remote 2047 MB cached + 2047 MB uncached) GPU core clock: 690 MHz, memory clock: 250 MHz 800 shader units organized in 10 SIMDs with 16 VLIW units (5-issue), wavefront size 64 threads supporting double precision 2 WUs already running on GPU 0 Starting WU on GPU 0 main integral, 160 iterations predicted runtime per iteration is 158 ms (33.3333 ms are allowed), dividing each iteration in 5 parts borders of the domains at 0 320 640 960 1280 1600 Calculated about 3.70012e+012 floatingpoint ops on GPU, 6.34181e+007 on FPU. Approximate GPU time 29.113 seconds. probability calculation (stars) Calculated about 7.64289e+008 floatingpoint ops on FPU. WU completed. CPU time: 4.38363 seconds, GPU time: 29.113 seconds, wall clock time: 90.632 seconds, CPU frequency: 2.66 GHz </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Invalid Claimed credit 0.177618976661038 Granted credit 0 application version 0.19 ID: 24520 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

skivelitis Send message Joined: 29 Jun 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 252,697 RAC: 0	Message 24523 - Posted: 8 Jun 2009, 0:47:13 UTC - in response to Message 24519. CPU only too. ID: 24523 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Dan T. Morris Send message Joined: 17 Mar 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 410,228,216 RAC: 0	Message 24527 - Posted: 8 Jun 2009, 1:38:31 UTC Last modified: 8 Jun 2009, 1:41:50 UTC Since the one min delay and the new wu I have also seen a large drop to the my rac, 200 k per day drop. But if the boys and girls who now want to have more to run on there one computer I guess they now have more to run..Go figure... DD, ID: 24527 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Misfit Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 915 Credit: 1,503,319 RAC: 0	Message 24536 - Posted: 8 Jun 2009, 5:41:21 UTC DA has gotten into the database. :) me@rescam.org ID: 24536 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote