1)
Message boards :
News :
Nbody WU Flush
(Message 73305)
Posted 4 May 2022 by Trotador Post: Well, based on the number of Nbody WUs that are waiting to be sent, it looks like the WUs that need re-validation were kicked back to the surface! I'm going to let things run. If you wind up with problems getting work, please let me know and I will figure something out. It seems to be working right, the nbody wus I'm receiving are the wingmen of wus crunched before April 20. Hope someone is crunching my wingmen's :) |
2)
Message boards :
News :
Nbody WU Flush
(Message 73258)
Posted 3 May 2022 by Trotador Post: Can someone check on the leftover WUs that still need to be validated, and look at a couple things for me? I'd like to know what the following values are for these WUs: https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=412567034 https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=413057030 https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=413674439 https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=414290323 |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Validation inconclusive
(Message 73120)
Posted 26 Apr 2022 by Trotador Post: I'm not actually upset in any way, these things can happen when one has to manage a BOINC project and a lot of effort is being put in solving the server issues which is well appreciatted, so no complaint. 90% of the nbody units crunched after April 20 are validated so kudos to the project manager What do you think of all these tasks previous to April 20? |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Validation inconclusive
(Message 73095)
Posted 24 Apr 2022 by Trotador Post: What do you think of all these tasks previous to April 20? https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=412567034 https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=413057030 https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=413674439 https://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/workunit.php?wuid=414290323 I've got other 3000 like them |
5)
Message boards :
MilkyWay@home Science :
Nbody Science
(Message 69900)
Posted 9 Jun 2020 by Trotador Post: Great!, thanks for the update! |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD Radeon R9 290X
(Message 60700)
Posted 7 Jan 2014 by Trotador Post:
Ok, thanks! |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD Radeon R9 290X
(Message 60691)
Posted 6 Jan 2014 by Trotador Post:
288larsson, would you please mind running again this Einstein test with the last drivers to check whether there's has been any improvement? Another question, was the card in quiet or uber mode during the test? Thanks in advance. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD Radeon R9 290X
(Message 60296)
Posted 3 Nov 2013 by Trotador Post: Thanks for the detailed report. Let's see how it goes when the needing support is available and maybe applications are tunned to take into account this specific card. |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD Radeon R9 290X
(Message 60285)
Posted 3 Nov 2013 by Trotador Post: Hi, any news on your experience with this card in MW or other distributed computing projects? Thanks |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group