1)
Message boards :
News :
New Poll Regarding GPU Application of N-Body
(Message 71044)
Posted 2 Aug 2021 by Wee Todd Didd Post: Wondering this as well. Could not find any recent N-Body in my results to look at to see if there was a verification of results. Current GPU's uses 2x the power of a CPU, So a GPU version with verification, would have to be 4x as fast at minimum to break even power consumption wise. quote]When you say it's not much faster than a CPU, do you mean single-core CPU vs single GPU? Or do you mean an 8 or 12 thread CPU vs a 512 CUDA Core GPU? Because N-Body can scale itself to multiple threads, and I image the CPU also uses all CUDA cores on a GPU....[/quote] |
2)
Message boards :
News :
New version of MilkyWay Nbody
(Message 68575)
Posted 23 Apr 2019 by Wee Todd Didd Post: Just noticed that since yesterday, receiving tasks, Milkyway@home N-Body Simulation v1.76 windows_x86_64, which is newer then the v1.74 the day before. Some examples are 1749436295, 1749436295, 1749419373 |
3)
Message boards :
News :
New version of MilkyWay Nbody
(Message 68574)
Posted 23 Apr 2019 by Wee Todd Didd Post: Just noticed that since yesterday, receiving tasks, Milkyway@home N-Body Simulation v1.76 windows_x86_64, which is newer then the v1.74 the day before. All are failing, same seems to go for others running the same work units. <core_client_version>7.14.2</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> The data is invalid. (0xd) - exit code 13 (0xd)</message> <stderr_txt> <search_application> milkyway_nbody 1.76 Windows x86_64 double , Crlibm </search_application> Error evaluating makePotential(): [string "-- /* Copyright (c) 2016 - 2018 Siddhartha ..."]:52: attempt to call field 'spherical' (a nil value) Failed to read input parameters file 18:34:37 (4280): called boinc_finish(13) </stderr_txt> ]]> |
©2023 Astroinformatics Group