1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Hardware Poll
(Message 38445)
Posted 9 Apr 2010 by ![]() Post: What motherboards are you all using for the dual GPU setups? Mainly looking for Socket 775 mobos. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Any 2/3 length ATI cards available for double precision?
(Message 38316)
Posted 7 Apr 2010 by ![]() Post: Why don't you just buy that same card your son has? |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
GPU Requirements [OLD]
(Message 38315)
Posted 7 Apr 2010 by ![]() Post: Just a quick note, the rare HD4830 works great also. |
4)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
GPU app teaser
(Message 11175)
Posted 17 Feb 2009 by ![]() Post: Awesome, thank you for all your help. Earlier you mentioned leaving the max_ncpus at 1, is there any harm in having it higher? I set it back to 5 and the times are immediately back to 2-3 seconds. Just bad timing I suppose, or could it be bottlenecked and needing some extra CPU power? |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
search progress visualization
(Message 11171)
Posted 17 Feb 2009 by ![]() Post: I think that is the most thorough explanation of a project I've ever read. Thank you Travis, I knew there was a reason this is my favorite project. |
6)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
GPU app teaser
(Message 11166)
Posted 17 Feb 2009 by ![]() Post: My HD4830 times have been going up steadily in the last day or so. Running almost 30 seconds now. |
7)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
Recompiled Linux 32/64 apps
(Message 11022)
Posted 16 Feb 2009 by ![]() Post: Thanks speedimic! Just dumped it onto my linux32 laptop. |
8)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
GPU app teaser
(Message 11019)
Posted 16 Feb 2009 by ![]() Post: Sounds like a good idea to me. |
9)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
GPU app teaser
(Message 10981)
Posted 16 Feb 2009 by ![]() Post: I am running another project, and I switched the resource share to 40% here at MW, bumped the avg_ncpus up to 0.5. I closed CCC and it seemed to help a bit, more towards the acceptable level. Also, is there going to be a new version for .18? |
10)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
GPU app teaser
(Message 10973)
Posted 16 Feb 2009 by ![]() Post: Running pretty well on my HD4830, but I would like it to be running 2 wu's instead of the 8 or so it's running currently. I have played with the app_info file and so far have had no success. Right now it's set on avg_ncpus to 0.2, and max_ncpus to 5 (quad core intel). Resource share on MW is set to 10% and it still continues to run 10 wu's in parallel. Any suggestions? I think I got it, but man it is killing my screen response time! |
11)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
GPU app teaser
(Message 10971)
Posted 16 Feb 2009 by ![]() Post: Running pretty well on my HD4830, but I would like it to be running 2 wu's instead of the 8 or so it's running currently. I have played with the app_info file and so far have had no success. Right now it's set on avg_ncpus to 0.2, and max_ncpus to 5 (quad core intel). Resource share on MW is set to 10% and it still continues to run 10 wu's in parallel. Any suggestions? |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is there an optimised app.....
(Message 9596)
Posted 3 Feb 2009 by ![]() Post: How do you download from there? |
13)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
What's needed to compile the app?
(Message 9096)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by ![]() Post: How would you go about compiling a 32bit Win (XP) version? Bump because I want the answer so I can mess with compiling. |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
What applications will be valid?
(Message 8749)
Posted 20 Jan 2009 by ![]() Post: There is nothing wrong with having an optimized app identify itself. It's been that way at SETI for a very long time. Holy crap, I agree with Misfit! |
15)
Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
What's needed to compile the app?
(Message 7537)
Posted 8 Dec 2008 by ![]() Post: So if I go through all this work, can I just change msse2 to mssse3? Will the speedup be worth it? |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No further Support for Milkyway at this time!
(Message 7487)
Posted 5 Dec 2008 by ![]() Post: I think you guys are missing the sarcasm. Notice the "team" name? |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
post milkyway_windows_x86_64 problems here
(Message 6516)
Posted 23 Nov 2008 by ![]() Post: Running 0.02 on xp64, Q9450, 4gb RAM. Running about 7 minutes, Milksop's version was running just over 4, so pretty close here. |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No new WU
(Message 3817)
Posted 18 Jun 2008 by ![]() Post: Any progress? |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No new WU
(Message 3793)
Posted 15 Jun 2008 by ![]() Post: Back to no work here too. |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Validation anyone
(Message 3680)
Posted 7 Jun 2008 by ![]() Post: No work downloading for me for awhile. |
©2023 Astroinformatics Group