1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Catalyst 9.7 released
(Message 29489)
Posted 19 Aug 2009 by nutcase Post: has anybody gotten anything to work on an HD4890? this card is frustrating me into an early grave! |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ATI 4750/4770/4890 support
(Message 21173)
Posted 3 May 2009 by nutcase Post: guess time to throw a gtx 260 in and go run gpugrid :( I do have one. but it is being RMA'd right now :( |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ATI 4750/4770/4890 support
(Message 21110)
Posted 2 May 2009 by nutcase Post: ok, tested it with my HD4890 and have same problem as poorboy. but was that with an HD4890? that is what the problem is. I changed the following in the app_info file and running the beta 8.61 driver: <avg_ncpus>0.8</avg_ncpus> <max_ncpus>1</max_ncpus> <cmdline>n1 f10</cmdline> and now it completes all wu's but did have 1 vpu recovery :( nevermind, second batch all errored out. guess time to throw a gtx 260 in and go run gpugrid :( |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ATI 4750/4770/4890 support
(Message 21100)
Posted 2 May 2009 by nutcase Post: ok, tested it with my HD4890 and have same problem as poorboy. looks to be a driver problem. too bad nothing but Cat 9.4 recognizes the card :( |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work again
(Message 8054)
Posted 30 Dec 2008 by nutcase Post: the blasted server is getting screwy. it was. I forgot I had the old optimized app on it |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work again
(Message 8014)
Posted 26 Dec 2008 by nutcase Post: the blasted server is getting screwy. I have one computer that can get all the work it wants. but another computer has not been able to get any work for 4 days |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
new workunit limit
(Message 7026)
Posted 30 Nov 2008 by nutcase Post: this project has now become a waste of my time. 1% resource share seems to be doing well with the project at the present time. the only real computer now running the project is My atom 230 system. My dual xeon and core-i7 systems just go through the project too fast to even worry about running the project on at the present time. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
new workunit limit
(Message 7022)
Posted 30 Nov 2008 by nutcase Post: this project has now become a waste of my time. 80% of your problems would go away just by increasing the size of the wu's. this would be a good Idea when you switch to the new app. But for now, it has been placed as a backup project with my computers. |
9)
Message boards :
Cafe MilkyWay :
Team Recruitment thread - CLOSED
(Message 3614)
Posted 31 May 2008 by nutcase Post: Introducing Team Starfire World Boinc! Who are we? We are a newly formed international team of some really long standing distributed computing participants and those new to DC as well. We have quite a few members that overclock and very open forums moderated by people who want everyone to feel comfortable. You'll find us to be a very friendly lot. We have an growing IRC server at irc.teamstarfire.net dedicated to BOINC and it's various projects, with the main channel being #team_starfire and more to come. Team Starfire World BOINC has teams for most BOINC projects and communicating about all BOINC related things is a part of our forums. Help pages, team stat pages etc. A fine forum for all BOINC projects. Drop in say hello and hang out whether you join us or not. We're looking forward to seeing you there! our web site We also have one the most comprehensive and up to date stats sites: stats and stones |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Please check this host
(Message 568)
Posted 25 Nov 2007 by nutcase Post: The High Benchmarks could be causing a problem if that is how the Core client figures out scores. That is an Old version of BOINC and was known to cause weird results. They did not cheat but should update their Boinc client to a newer version. You guys should have looked at the returned results and would have found out Either the core client has a problem or the WU's are causing problems. Every WU I checked showed memory leaks in them. this can only be caused by the core client or by the WU's. This would not be caused by the Boinc Client. |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group