Posts by Stony666
|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
8 Workunit limit
(Message 4597)
Posted 1 Aug 2008 by  Stony666
Post: Why do they change something and write on the HP...
How should we do this, if no admin/engineer is on the forum to see the results of their change?? This is not very professional but demotivates the people who spend their cpu cycles and money... Huhu, somebody out there?? |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
8 Workunit limit
(Message 4579)
Posted 31 Jul 2008 by Stony666
Post: No message from admins... My first v8 is now moved to another project. The next one will follow this evening. |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
8 Workunit limit
(Message 4558)
Posted 30 Jul 2008 by Stony666
Post: My dual 5440 needs 2:50 for 8 long WUs... Only 3 Min for 8 short one :( And there are still short WUs on the way. They produce a lot of idle time when only loading one after finishing one. The 20 WU discussion is going on till some month. What is the problem here?? The only problem is the amount of WUs! Sorry admins, but i don't understand the backgroud of your decision to deliver only 20 now 8 WUs. Deliver not more then 5 WUs per Core or something similar. Artificial Intelligence is using this. And it works... |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
8 Workunit limit
(Message 4548)
Posted 30 Jul 2008 by Stony666
Post: Hi, this new policy punishes my 8 core crunchers with idle time. I really like these longer WUs because they give me a safer feeling in failure situation of the project. With only 1 WU per core, I have to add another project. Sorry, but this reduction is not a good idea. I hope, you will change it back. On friday, I leave for holidays. Cannot let my crunchers in this state when I'm not at home... Regards Joerg |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No new WU
(Message 3974)
Posted 2 Jul 2008 by Stony666
Post: Looks as if we are out of new work again... |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No new WU
(Message 3967)
Posted 30 Jun 2008 by Stony666
Post: Seems to me that there is a full filesystem or something similar... 30-Jun-2008 20:18:22 [Milkyway@home] Started upload of gs_607_1214877479_1083490_0_0 30-Jun-2008 20:18:23 [Milkyway@home] Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 30-Jun-2008 20:18:23 [Milkyway@home] Message from server: Server can't open log file (../log_milkyway/cgi.log) 30-Jun-2008 20:18:25 [Milkyway@home] [error] Error on file upload: can't open log file 30-Jun-2008 20:18:25 [Milkyway@home] Temporarily failed upload of gs_607_1214877479_1083490_0_0: transient upload error 30-Jun-2008 20:18:25 [Milkyway@home] Backing off 4 min 5 sec on upload of gs_607_1214877479_1083490_0_0 |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Poll: How much credit do you think is fair?
(Message 2710)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by Stony666
Post: 4 |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group