Posts by NekdDrgn

1) Message boards : Application Code Discussion : GPU/CUDA Milkyway (Message 22072) Posted 12 May 2009 by NekdDrgn Post: What's the latest on this? Still having issues?
2) Message boards : Application Code Discussion : GPU/CUDA Milkyway (Message 17847) Posted 7 Apr 2009 by NekdDrgn Post: Would have to be Ati. A developement version of Cuda is supposed to be released when the Gpu portion of MW goes live. Excellent. Looking forward to it.
3) Message boards : Application Code Discussion : GPU/CUDA Milkyway (Message 17838) Posted 7 Apr 2009 by NekdDrgn Post: Where is the CUDA version? I don't see it on zslip.... Or are you talking about the ATI version?
4) Message boards : Application Code Discussion : GPU/CUDA Milkyway (Message 17055) Posted 28 Mar 2009 by NekdDrgn Post: Good to hear from again Travis,I was thinking the Flu really knocked the stuffin out of ya! Is this CUDA as in nVidia video cards?( GPU's) I'm going to say yes... as I have experience with other projects so it's safe to assume that. Especially since ATI cards are already "supported" with Milkyway...
5) Message boards : Number crunching : 3rd.in - optimized apps (Message 16766) Posted 24 Mar 2009 by NekdDrgn Post: I changed it to .19 and it seems slower... is that right? I figured with a newer version it would be faster. It's possible you were crunching slightly shorter WUs with the 0.16 app than with the 0.19 app. A ps_s7x or ps_s8x WU is shorter than a ps_s2x WU, I've noticed. Yeah, I figured that out. It's been awhile since I ran Milkyway and didn't notice the different length WU's. Thanks guys!
6) Message boards : Number crunching : 3rd.in - optimized apps (Message 16707) Posted 23 Mar 2009 by NekdDrgn Post: Perhaps I was wrong... Unless it was just different on my main desktop from my laptop. I see BOINC pulls down a .19 app, is that the same as the one from zslip? Sorry if it's the explained in the hundreds of posts... but I guess I just need it told to me a different way ;)
7) Message boards : Number crunching : 3rd.in - optimized apps (Message 16702) Posted 23 Mar 2009 by NekdDrgn Post: Is it okay to use the .16 version? Any major bugs with it? Still get credit for it? Just wondering as I accidentally downloaded the .16 version instead of the .19 from zslip and it seemed to be crunching away on some WU's... I changed it to .19 and it seems slower... is that right? I figured with a newer version it would be faster.
8) Message boards : Application Code Discussion : milkyway code releases (Message 7493) Posted 6 Dec 2008 by NekdDrgn Post: Thanks guys for all the work your doing to try and improve things... I have NO idea what it is you guys do, but it's working and I have no complaints. Keep up the good work!
9) Message boards : Application Code Discussion : milkyway code releases (Message 7165) Posted 1 Dec 2008 by NekdDrgn Post: Gotcha. Will we have to detach from the project and reattach again or will it work automatically?
10) Message boards : Application Code Discussion : milkyway code releases (Message 7146) Posted 1 Dec 2008 by NekdDrgn Post: I run a Win XP Pro quad and I detached from MW (having completed all WUs) and then reattached. All client files and work downloaded OK. I just did that and it worked... it says it's running the Optimised 0.04 app though, shouldn't it say 0.06?
11) Message boards : Application Code Discussion : milkyway code releases (Message 7139) Posted 1 Dec 2008 by NekdDrgn Post: My PC's are all out of work and the server keeps sending a message back of "No Work Sent".. I've reset the project and was hoping it would just download the files I need for the new app (assuming they are required now), but it's not working... How do you compile the new app in for Windows?
12) Message boards : Number crunching : post milkyway_windows_x86_64 problems here (Message 6628) Posted 24 Nov 2008 by NekdDrgn Post: ^Nevermind that.. I see the huge thread started because of this.
13) Message boards : Number crunching : post milkyway_windows_x86_64 problems here (Message 6626) Posted 24 Nov 2008 by NekdDrgn Post: I've got several platforms not getting any work units when requesting from server... I've waited it out a few hours, but here's the message that I'm getting on 3 different OS's (Vista64, Server 2003, and XP) 11/24/2008 3:26:43 PM\|Milkyway@home\|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 11/24/2008 3:26:48 PM\|Milkyway@home\|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 11/24/2008 3:26:48 PM\|Milkyway@home\|Message from server: Server error: can't attach shared memory "Cant attach shared memory" - What does that mean?