1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No Work
(Message 3621)
Posted 31 May 2008 by yuriankone Post: The WU's seem to be comming in again. That was quick. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No Work
(Message 3617)
Posted 31 May 2008 by yuriankone Post: And here we go again. The wu's seem to have gone away for the weekend. And why not, i do the same. |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Increased WU Credit
(Message 2822)
Posted 25 Mar 2008 by yuriankone Post: Hail to chief travis! I kept MW running on full speed, this makes it just more fun! |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Poll: How much credit do you think is fair?
(Message 2704)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by yuriankone Post: 4.34 |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2691)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by yuriankone Post: See Emanuel what the deal is for me is there is what I deem 8-10 worthy projects I crunch for....I will tend to give higher resource share to those that pay better but not always so ...look at where I am at LHC....but because there are 50+ projects out there ,,,,the competition now plays a role...look at the stats sites running stats specifically targeting those projects and teams competing in them. I agree, i'll keep MW running, but i'll lower the priority. For me the best stat is the % stat for each project. I'm still new, but i'll try to reach the top 90 % on 1 or 2 projects asap. |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group