Welcome to MilkyWay@home

Posts by yuriankone

1) Message boards : Number crunching : No Work (Message 3621)
Posted 31 May 2008 by yuriankone
Post:
The WU's seem to be comming in again. That was quick.
2) Message boards : Number crunching : No Work (Message 3617)
Posted 31 May 2008 by yuriankone
Post:
And here we go again. The wu's seem to have gone away for the weekend. And why not, i do the same.
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Increased WU Credit (Message 2822)
Posted 25 Mar 2008 by yuriankone
Post:
Hail to chief travis!

I kept MW running on full speed, this makes it just more fun!
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Poll: How much credit do you think is fair? (Message 2704)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by yuriankone
Post:
4.34
5) Message boards : Number crunching : updated granted credit (Message 2691)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by yuriankone
Post:
See Emanuel what the deal is for me is there is what I deem 8-10 worthy projects I crunch for....I will tend to give higher resource share to those that pay better but not always so ...look at where I am at LHC....but because there are 50+ projects out there ,,,,the competition now plays a role...look at the stats sites running stats specifically targeting those projects and teams competing in them.


Yeah, y'know if you're reasonable about it I think it's fine to make a trade-off based on credits. You have to use something, right? But what annoys me is seeing the posts above where people say "I joined this for the credits, now it sucks, bye-bye." I think you can at least pick projects based on the science they do, then prioritize between them using credits if you can't decide how else.


I agree, i'll keep MW running, but i'll lower the priority.

For me the best stat is the % stat for each project. I'm still new, but i'll try to reach the top 90 % on 1 or 2 projects asap.




©2023 Astroinformatics Group