1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ATi 4770 - Problems with Milkyway
(Message 32674)
Posted 23 Oct 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post:
thanks for this. As I don't have a win7 yet, I'll have to manage with XP32 I tried the 9.8 no CCC, and the <cmdline>w1.3</cmdline> part. gpuZ tells me the card is loaded at 80% It is stable as long as I do not touch anything, open no window, launch no program... |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ATi 4770 - Problems with Milkyway
(Message 32646)
Posted 22 Oct 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: ... |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ATi 4770 - Problems with Milkyway
(Message 32645)
Posted 22 Oct 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: Oh yeah sorry the OS is XP 32 bit tho. please can you give more info about Raimund BarbelnĀ“s W1.3 as i'm facing the same VPU recovery after a few seconds of crunching ... |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Using the MW ATi application, Q & A
(Message 32641)
Posted 22 Oct 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: thanks for these, verstapp |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Using the MW ATi application, Q & A
(Message 32639)
Posted 22 Oct 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: Hello,
I guess this is not accurate anymore anyway, I have a 4770 and Cat 8.12 does not recognize the 4770 I encounter VPU recovery after a few seconds of calculation. I'm on XP32 / CCC 9.9 / Boinc 6.10.13 / 0.20b (tried also the 0.20) anyone for a clue ? thanks |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work Availability v2 (June 9)
(Message 24793)
Posted 10 Jun 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: a rushing river of WUs without the help of a script. that's nice ! thanx |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ATI GPU app 0.19f fixes the ps_sgr_208_3s errors
(Message 24360)
Posted 6 Jun 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: thanks a lot, nice job ! |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work Availability?
(Message 24149)
Posted 4 Jun 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: since the last 2 or 3 days now, I'm getting a little more WUs the idling time of my ATIs is shorter now. ... I'm surprised this 1 min setting has an impact. It means a lot of scripters were refreshing more than once in a minute... |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why is it so hard to get work?
(Message 23487)
Posted 27 May 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: As I pointed out in this message and to Travis... I agree with this 15 minute minimum time between host contact... As a script user, if I decide to stop running script, the whole project wins a little, and I loose a lot (compared to those still running script). It would be better that every scripter stops, so that we'll all win. But that won't happen as we're greedy humans. That's why I won't stop running script. But as I see it hammers the server, I see as an easy solution to set a 15 minute (or watever) minimum time between host contact ... Brian Silver's analogy with grocery behavior is very accurate. We live a starvation time Every body wants bread, but there is very little amount of baguettes available. A fight is close to occur if no rule is established to limit the maximum number of baguettes a good mother can bring back to feed her hungry childs. |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
MilkyWay_GPU - Almost There!
(Message 22917)
Posted 21 May 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: much respect to your involvement, CP. and may the code be cristal clear ;) |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
WUs distribution
(Message 21472)
Posted 7 May 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post:
I'm sure CPU guys are not hammering as much as we GPU guys do. Therefore it's a false good idea. A better solution would be to implement a SETI-ATI-app, and you'll see GPU-guys move away for a fresh source of credit, MW could breath again after that... I read that Cluster physik developped the MW-ATI-app, could it be possible to reiterate this achievement ? . |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why is it so hard to get work?
(Message 20902)
Posted 30 Apr 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: I am just getting tired of all these people saying, go to other projects until this is resolved. I agree on that. My feeling is that MW people are headed in a tough way of developping a new CUDA compatible project. During that time, why not take the opportunity of Cluster Physiks's gifted people to create a new ATI app for GPU project ? Then, when CUDA app is ready, both Nvidia and ATI can crunch. |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
MilkyWay_GPU
(Message 18830)
Posted 15 Apr 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: GREAT ! \o/ hoping 1000 times long WUs |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Server Updates and Status
(Message 17426)
Posted 3 Apr 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: like spoiled rich kids. ... I'm not jealous because some crunchers use v8 or v16 or even can have acces to server farms and 32 core machines... I only have a c2d and it's OK that these people are in the same score table than me I can compare with other similar cpus. I once was top 22 in rac with my Q6600 on Rosetta. Shortly after came some 45 nm new cpus, and numerus 8 cores... now i7. I sunk below top 1000 in rac, as did a lot of Q6600 that can be considered now "not so young" tools. But I don't feel i7 should have had a special credit table and rankings. Now, life evolves, new tools are available, and that's great ! If we create separate rankings, why not do the same for optimzed/standard apps, linux/win/mac, 2/4/8/16 cores ... The fact is that GPU are better tools now. Maybe that will last only a few years, who knows ? It was hardly predictable last year that ATI's will be so effective crunchers. That's why I think Milkyway People should not create two separate projects, but only a way to crunch longer WUs. |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Server Updates and Status
(Message 17378)
Posted 2 Apr 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: boinc 6.8 will detect ATIs |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Server Updates and Status
(Message 17375)
Posted 2 Apr 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: furthermore, CPU's can be useful on projects that didn't implement GPU crunch yet don't split stats ! |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Server Updates and Status
(Message 17343)
Posted 2 Apr 2009 by [AF>DoJ] supersonic Post: I'd suggest the GPU project spit out normal (but longer, more complex) WUs that would run on CPUs, and it's up to us to use the correct GPU specific app. I agree on that |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group