Posts by LiborA

1) Message boards : Number crunching : MilkyWay_GPU II (Message 24945) Posted 11 Jun 2009 by LiborA Post: Well we still need a CUDA app - my 3 Nv 9800s are getting bored with GPUGrid. :) Try Aqua@home if you don´t like GPUGrid :).
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Deleted Accounts (Message 19365) Posted 18 Apr 2009 by LiborA Post: I also know on of cruncher with deleted account. His alias is gigadisk and cross project ID is 65bb2b3a135cbfea9ca42a25feed4a25. EDIT: gigadisk has create a new account as Dave wrote on massage 19002 Edit 2: His old ID is 4719 (thanks for free-dc stats :) )
3) Message boards : Number crunching : GECCO2008 paper accepted (Message 2272) Posted 15 Mar 2008 by LiborA Post: Congratulation Travis
4) Message boards : Number crunching : More Work !!! Please :) (Message 2247) Posted 14 Mar 2008 by LiborA Post: Again without new works: 14.3.2008 7:24:27\|Milkyway@home\|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 4906 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 14.3.2008 7:24:32\|Milkyway@home\|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 14.3.2008 7:25:33\|Milkyway@home\|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 4916 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 14.3.2008 7:25:38\|Milkyway@home\|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 14.3.2008 7:26:39\|Milkyway@home\|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 4927 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 14.3.2008 7:26:44\|Milkyway@home\|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
5) Message boards : Number crunching : More Work !!! Please :) (Message 2207) Posted 13 Mar 2008 by LiborA Post: To Crunch3r: very nice picture To Travis: Pleas, I'd like new work
6) Message boards : Number crunching : Pipeline drained - what about new WUs? (Message 1724) Posted 15 Feb 2008 by LiborA Post: ... just started up a new set. i've been trying to start different numbers of searches at the same time to see how it effects the convergence rates, so i have to wait for the previous batch to finish before i start up a new one. Thats sounds very well. Do you think about add batch statistics/monitor on home page? (For example batch monitor have QMC or SIMAP)
7) Questions and Answers : Wish list : 20 WU per core - not per host (Message 1511) Posted 16 Jan 2008 by LiborA Post: Yes, 20 WUs per core will be better :-)
8) Questions and Answers : Wish list : Linux x86-64bit application (Message 1510) Posted 16 Jan 2008 by LiborA Post: Me too. Also Me :)
9) Message boards : Number crunching : No work from project ... (Message 1416) Posted 10 Jan 2008 by LiborA Post: Again without WUs for crunching :-( My comps are hungry I think we shouldn't expect too much while the M@H team are looking into the server crashes - but I hope they figure it out soon! Yeah, thats truth. I wish good luck to M@H team with solving server problem.
10) Message boards : Number crunching : No work from project ... (Message 1414) Posted 10 Jan 2008 by LiborA Post: Again without WUs for crunching :-( My comps are hungry
11) Message boards : Number crunching : Windows vs. Linux application (Message 1171) Posted 25 Dec 2007 by LiborA Post: The problem behind this might be that the linux is using a 64 bit binary (where i'm pretty sure the windows does not). Are you sure? I have downloaded astronomy_1.13_i686-pc-linux-gnu executable, it seems as 32b application? And on download folder isn't x86_64 application available. We're working on getting a 64-bit windows system to compile on which will hopefully improve the times on windows. Its a very good message for all users of 64b Windows OS :-)
12) Message boards : Number crunching : Windows vs. Linux application (Message 1168) Posted 23 Dec 2007 by LiborA Post: Hallo, on our team board we discussed about crunching time of Convolution Work Units. We compared two machines and results are interesting. 'bosh - AMD X2 4200 Windows XP WU-------h--m--s gs_72... 00:19:39 gs_70... 00:19:41 gs_62... 00:05:26 gs_60... 00:05:25 LiborA - AMD A64 2800+ OpenSuse 10.3 64b WU--------h--m--s gs_74 ... 00:13:39 gs_73 ... 00:13:31 gs_72 ... 00:13:43 gs_72 ... 00:13:34 gs_71 ... 00:13:29 gs_62 ... 00:05:26 gs_60 ... 00:05:24 It seems that for non-convolution Work Units the application need a similar time for the WU in the same range. But for Convolution Work Units is linux application a more, more effective.
13) Message boards : Number crunching : convolution searches (Message 1155) Posted 22 Dec 2007 by LiborA Post: WTF? You only crunch 3 gs5's an hour with a dualcore Athlon64 4000+? My Athlon64 3500+ single-core does the same. And it is not OC'd. Or is it just 18cr per hour per core? Yes this is per core
14) Message boards : Number crunching : convolution searches (Message 1094) Posted 15 Dec 2007 by LiborA Post: For this my comp is still credit system 6,5 cr per WU about 10% worse as for gs_3x WU. For gs_3x I got about 20 cr/hour For gs_5x I got about 18 cr/hour
15) Message boards : Number crunching : Per Host Limit (Message 533) Posted 23 Nov 2007 by LiborA Post: Interesting! On My Windows machine I get only 8 WUs per CPU per day but on Linux machine is different situation. I joined my Linux machine today in project and yet I have 29 WUs downloaded (5 WUs from thiese was cancelled by server as redundant result - and the second interest think is that all of thiese cancelled WUs was sended to another cruncher after cancelation on my computer )