21)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Reverting to Stock
(Message 8809)
Posted 21 Jan 2009 by caspr Post: Yep, that's what I saw. Future WU are .12 apps. Anything left from before seem to run under the old app (unless you delete it (I really need to do this)-I suspect it then has a conniption fit!) The last time I reset Apps. I just did a quick detach / reattach and it worked fine. I guess since the wu's that I've got are still validating I'll stay with the .07 App. till it stops? |
22)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work again
(Message 8701)
Posted 20 Jan 2009 by caspr Post: Ummm... no new work available again ;( Just loaded my box up again! |
23)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Vote for the MilkyWay favicon!
(Message 8637)
Posted 19 Jan 2009 by caspr Post: I Kinda like #9 |
24)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New faster application?
(Message 8340)
Posted 15 Jan 2009 by caspr Post: Can anyone tell me which DL to use for 64bit and which one to use for 32bit windoz? |
25)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Bad set of WUs !
(Message 7624)
Posted 11 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: I'm crunching in 64 windoz right now but I can switch over to 64 Linux and check it out. |
26)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7347)
Posted 3 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: I'm not gonna get all philosophical on this but I WAS getting about 9k here (milsop's app.) and now less than 1.5k per day.( new opp app) I'd just like to see a reasonable adjustment. I'm running an '03server 3.0 xeon DDR2-400 Ecc Reg's So its a Quad... kinda. EDIT: Is this about bumping the client or fair credits per cpu? EDITx2 Sorry I'm not running an i7! |
27)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7342)
Posted 3 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: Bob in FL Send message Joined: Jul 19 08 Posts: 2 ID: 6411 Credit: 228,568 RAC: 10,291 Message 7326 - Posted 3 Dec 2008 13:29:18 UTC Last modified: 3 Dec 2008 13:33:51 UTC Thanks to everyone. I am back up and running again. I'll be anxious to see if someone comes up with a new optimized application. With the new credit calculations, I have some systems now that are getting a better credit per CPU second on Seti! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just a statement made on another thread! |
28)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7339)
Posted 3 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: I'm not gonna get all philosophical on this but I WAS getting about 9k here (milsop's app.) and now less than 1.5k per day.( new opp app) I'd just like to see a reasonable adjustment. |
29)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
work availability
(Message 7297)
Posted 3 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: Which of the new lengths of wu's is going to be the one used for time being? Considering I'm only getting 15% to 20% of the credit I used to,... are you planning to do anything about that in the future? |
30)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7250)
Posted 2 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: [quote] I've heard this somewhere before!! ......DITTO? |
31)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7245)
Posted 2 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: OK, The first full day of crunching the new opp. app. I dropped from about 9k using milsop's app. to about 1.5k with the new app. Yep, I think a little adjustment is in order. I dont expect to make as much as with Milsop's app. but I'd like to see about half as much anyway. |
32)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7229)
Posted 2 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: 50/h but on which cpu? Don't just think Linux is faster than Windoz! 64 bit windoz on Milsops app. did a WU in 10 mins. and it took 12.5 mins on Linux 64,.... same box, dual boot, 3.0 Xeon,...'03 server With DDR2-400 Ecc Reg's |
33)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Faster application (links inside)
(Message 7221)
Posted 2 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: What am I doing wrong? I am getting no work. I detached, and reattached, and installed the faster app. The old faster app worked great, but I am getting no work? Just detach/reattach and leave it alone! There is no longer a faster app. Everyone is now on a level playing field! As it should be! |
34)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
I'm not getting a single WU
(Message 7216)
Posted 2 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: Bob, just do a quick detach/reattach of MW and you'll get work! Edit: You will have to do it on all you're box's if you don't use an acct. manager |
35)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
new workunit limit
(Message 7212)
Posted 2 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: I am getting no work sent? Now for almost a day? Rick, do a detach / reattach and you should get work. |
36)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7208)
Posted 2 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: With the 04 app. I'm making 20CPH on a 3.0 xeon xp64 pro |
37)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
new workunit limit
(Message 7195)
Posted 1 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: That option is not available in Milky Way preferences, Bigred. Just checked and it is there, "run test applications"? |
38)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7191)
Posted 1 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: ... 50 credits per hour seems to be a happy medium from the low projects and the higher paying projects. DITTO! |
39)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
credit comparison to other projects
(Message 7158)
Posted 1 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: And now on to everybody's favorite subject :) Why use seti as a benchmark? Run your own project! Personally, Ive seen my credits cut in half just since yesterday with the "new" app. and I expect them to go down more with the first full day of work being processed. |
40)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
post milkyway_i686-pc-linux-gnu problems here
(Message 7114)
Posted 1 Dec 2008 by caspr Post: Thanks Conan! I was going to run my windoz down and check #'s on Linux but I guess since you've already done it I'll stick with Windoz! |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group