Posts by Buga1
|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
ps_separation_17_test2 fail.
(Message 49727)
Posted 28 Jun 2011 by  Buga1
Post: All ps_separation_17_test2 wu's seem to be working about the right length of time, but at the end fail. This is across 3 systems, from 4830,50,70 up to the 6950. |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
combined cuda and ATI GPU crunching in the same host
(Message 15899)
Posted 18 Mar 2009 by Buga1
Post: Have you got all your windows updates? I had that kind of problem on a system I forgot to update windows on. But it seemed to work without the update on version 19b. I forgot what the file updates were named now, but i know they are listed in this thread somewhere. Here Rick Edit. I think it was the .NET Framework. Someone should beable to answer better for you soon though. |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No work
(Message 13342)
Posted 28 Feb 2009 by Buga1
Post: Still constantly running dry. Now its just quicker with the 6 per. But I can normally pick up some after 5-10 manual updates. Instead of 25-50 updates. LOL And as I type this, ran out again. GPUS are almost TO fast. And deferred 2+hrs again. LMAO Rick Edit - Well maybe I should take that back. On number 63...64...65... Manual update and still nothing. Edit 2- Well on number 77 I got 10 WU's. And done in under 2 mins. Back to nothing. LOL Manual update 4....5....6....7....8....9 LMAO |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
new workunit queue size (6)
(Message 13106)
Posted 27 Feb 2009 by Buga1
Post: Yep, not seeing a change here either. Took 30 mins of updating every min to get like 3 mins of work. Then back to nothing. Would be nice to see 20 per core sitting there. Rick |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Jan 24 credit change complaints/comments here
(Message 9048)
Posted 25 Jan 2009 by Buga1
Post: My question is why this insane push to lower credit awards. Perhaps it is not that MilkyWay is too high, but the other projects are too low ... As SaH increased the speed of the applications they kept reducing the award per hour ... Id say at least 34 are WAY to low if comparing them to a supposed SETI standard. (That lowers itself all the time) |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
20 workunit limit
(Message 7029)
Posted 30 Nov 2008 by Buga1
Post: Maybe I should get the Rubber Diggy (333mhz) going. LMAO I agree that the "deferring communications for xx minutes" is a pain though. I catch my machines waiting 1-4 hours regularly. And the occasional 24 hr. Rick |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group