1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Donating to Milkyway@Home
(Message 50332)
Posted 21 Jul 2011 by hoarfrost Post: I like this project. My $5 donation smaller than $25, but (I think) better than 0. :) I believe in MilkyWay@Home. |
2)
Message boards :
News :
ps_separation_17_test
(Message 49737)
Posted 29 Jun 2011 by hoarfrost Post: Hello! Have a computation errors and errors of verification with my hosts 103082 (Radeon HD 4890) and 215277 (Radeon HD 4850). |
3)
Message boards :
News :
Separation updated to 0.82
(Message 49256)
Posted 13 Jun 2011 by hoarfrost Post: With this app_info.xml computation runs fine. Thank you! <app_info> |
4)
Message boards :
News :
Separation updated to 0.80
(Message 49235)
Posted 13 Jun 2011 by hoarfrost Post: Hello! With app_info.xml placed below, my computer became a computation errors generator: <app_info> When I remove <cmdline> tags computations run normally, but GUI works slow... |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Validation Error
(Message 49192)
Posted 10 Jun 2011 by hoarfrost Post: Hello! Sometimes I have results like 46282821 - downloaded and computed normally, not invalid, but not validated. Why? :) Happy crunching! |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
super charged?
(Message 43686)
Posted 10 Nov 2010 by hoarfrost Post: All WU's computed as usual. All WU's, that displayed in hosts tasks, take a normal Granted Credit. But Granted Credit for user grows too fast. |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Orphaned tasks
(Message 42287)
Posted 21 Sep 2010 by hoarfrost Post: Hello! Project administrators, my host 215277 have a numerous tasks, received before 21 Sep 2010 2:40:00 UTC, that never been computed, because my host did not know about it's. Please mark all WU's older than noted date as 'No reply', or 'Detached'. Thank you! |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Strange Message
(Message 42074)
Posted 12 Sep 2010 by hoarfrost Post: +1 |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Aaargh! Server out of new work!
(Message 40938)
Posted 15 Jul 2010 by hoarfrost Post: Zero work again. |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
No New Work
(Message 40716)
Posted 28 Jun 2010 by hoarfrost Post: Message from server: (Project has no jobs available) |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Aaargh! Server out of new work!
(Message 39492)
Posted 7 May 2010 by hoarfrost Post: +1 |
12)
Message boards :
News :
testing validator for new application
(Message 38953)
Posted 21 Apr 2010 by hoarfrost Post: Hello! :-) Host 103082.
|
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Can't get new work units
(Message 35833)
Posted 19 Jan 2010 by hoarfrost Post: Now confirm "Use ATI GPU option" and receive task. Unpredictable scheduler. :) |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Can't get new work units
(Message 35832)
Posted 19 Jan 2010 by hoarfrost Post: Hello! Computer && BOINC: 19/01/2010 17:16:14 Starting BOINC client version 6.10.24 for windows_intelx86 Use app_info.xml <app_info> Request:
Why? Before ~ 08:20 19.01.2010 all works done. |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
app_version settings
(Message 35574)
Posted 12 Jan 2010 by hoarfrost Post: Hello! Excuse me please if my English is not right. If I understand right, distribution for CPU and GPU Time between all task managed by section client_state.xml (and server reply file), that shown below: <app_version> When I manually correct values that marked bold, to 0.5 for exclusive using of 1 (and only one) CPU core for 2 GPU tasks that runs simultaneously, on first several units I see an ideal "picture" when BOINC runs 2 units on GPU and percent of GPU load all time was 99-100%. When one of units was ended, GPU loaded "decreased" to 97-98%. When GPU crunch only 1 WU its load down to 0% on 2 or 3 seconds (when BOINC finish one WU and start next). But when BOINC start to crunch next WU's values of CPU% reset to 68% and "ideal picture" was destroyed. Can project administrators set the default values of this parameters to 0.25 for 4-GPU units crunching on 1 CPU core? Happy crunching! :-) |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Testing ATI Application Availability
(Message 35564)
Posted 12 Jan 2010 by hoarfrost Post: With BOINC Manager v6.10.24 works. Thank you! :) Can I control a CPU Time% that need for GPU-unit and number of concurrent GPU-units? By default - only 68%, that too small, because with 100% I have a 99% GPU load, but with 68% - 90-95% only (about 6000 CS per day). |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Testing ATI Application Availability
(Message 35555)
Posted 12 Jan 2010 by hoarfrost Post: BOINC v6.10.25? I see 6.10.18 as recommended and 6.10.24 as development... |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Testing ATI Application Availability
(Message 35552)
Posted 12 Jan 2010 by hoarfrost Post: Hello! Host 103082. ATI Radeon HD4890. ATI Catalyst 9.12. 12/01/2010 20:06:37 Starting BOINC client version 6.10.3 for windows_intelx86
Back to app_info... |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Computation parameters
(Message 31256)
Posted 20 Sep 2009 by hoarfrost Post: More unfortunately is the fact that at this time the tasks can be completed in such short time periods. GPU Grids tasks are, even on fast GPUs, about 6 to 10 hours in length. Collatz tasks are 15 minutes or more, and so on ... My 4870 GPU does MW tasks in under a minute each ... that means lots of calls to the server. At least once every 20 minutes or so ... 3 times an hour, 72 times a day and that is only to get the tasks ... I am uploading a result once per minute or as many as 1440 times a day in addition to that just to upload results ... MilkyWay@Home project RAC near the 50 000 000. WU "price" ~ 50 CS. MW need operate about 1 000 000 WU's per one day. 1 WU = 2 files = 1 input + 1 output. MW@H must operate about (2 000 000 file / day) / (86 400 sec / day) ~ 23 file / second. |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Computation parameters
(Message 31254)
Posted 20 Sep 2009 by hoarfrost Post: Hello all! :-) If I understood right, computation parameters for each task put in one very small (about 200-800 bytes) file that BOINC must download from server. And output results must be written in very small file, that BOINC upload to server. If this parameters write into WU-info, that BOINC get in task request and write into client_state.xml as command-line arguments (for example), and computation result also write into "fields" of "task-report request" - may be server loading decrease? P.S. Excuse me please if my English is not right. :-) |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group