1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problem with N-Body Simulation 1.48 never finishing
(Message 63492)
Posted 2 May 2015 by Nick Post: I'm another one who had to disable n-body simulations. It reached 100% but continued on endlessly. |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why won't MilkyWay request new tasks?
(Message 57911)
Posted 13 Apr 2013 by Nick Post: PMAD? The poster goes by the name of "Poke Me And Die". PMAD. |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why won't MilkyWay request new tasks?
(Message 57904)
Posted 12 Apr 2013 by Nick Post: PMAD The BOINC website says 7.0.28 is the latest stable version. |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why won't MilkyWay request new tasks?
(Message 57898)
Posted 12 Apr 2013 by Nick Post: I've seen this before with other projects and it always baffles me. I'm out of tasks and have been for hours, yet even with a manual update, BOINC won't request new tasks: 4/12/2013 9:25:12 AM | Milkyway@Home | update requested by user 4/12/2013 9:25:17 AM | Milkyway@Home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 4/12/2013 9:25:17 AM | Milkyway@Home | Not reporting or requesting tasks 4/12/2013 9:25:19 AM | Milkyway@Home | Scheduler request completed |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Need app_info for N-Body Simulation
(Message 57886)
Posted 11 Apr 2013 by Nick Post: Thanks to all who tried to help. Maybe someday someone can post the app_info.xml to allow N-Body to work when also using a GPU. It's too confusing for me to figure out. Nick |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Need app_info for N-Body Simulation
(Message 57877)
Posted 10 Apr 2013 by Nick Post: How does one get the N-Body application? |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Need app_info for N-Body Simulation
(Message 57874)
Posted 10 Apr 2013 by Nick Post: Richard, I'm not rolling my own. I wouldn't even know how. I'm just running Milkyway@home and it's giving me that notice message. You say I need to be running version 1.08. Version 1.08 of what and how do I get that version? I would think that an FAQ would go a long way to help people here. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Need app_info for N-Body Simulation
(Message 57871)
Posted 10 Apr 2013 by Nick Post: No, I don't have a convincing case, but it worked last night. Is there a FAQ somewhere which explains these things? |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Need app_info for N-Body Simulation
(Message 57869)
Posted 10 Apr 2013 by Nick Post: I'm getting the following notice: "Your app_info.xml file doesn't have a useable version of MilkyWay@Home N-Body Simulation" Can someone please provide me with the proper lines to add? Nick |
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Example app_info.xml
(Message 56289)
Posted 24 Nov 2012 by Nick Post: Thank you Gary. I was able to modify it for Nvidia and that solves my problem! Question. How would anyone find this out without help? Nick |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Example app_info.xml
(Message 56287)
Posted 24 Nov 2012 by Nick Post: Let me try this another way. The below app_info.xml file will allow 4 instances of a cuda file to run. It will not allow CPU tasks to be fetched or run. If I delete this file, CPU tasks will download and run fine and a single instance of a cuda file will download and run file. Can anyone tell me how to get this to run both multiple CPU tasks and multiple Cuda tasks? <app> <name>milkyway</name> </app> <file_info> <name>milkyway_separation_1.02_windows_x86_64__opencl_nvidia.exe</name> <executable/> </file_info> <app_version> <app_name>milkyway</app_name> <version_num>102</version_num> <flops>1.0e11</flops> <avg_ncpus>0.05</avg_ncpus> <max_ncpus>1</max_ncpus> <plan_class>cuda</plan_class> <coproc> <type>NVIDIA</type> <count>0.25</count> </coproc> <cmdline> </cmdline> <file_ref> <file_name>milkyway_separation_1.02_windows_x86_64__opencl_nvidia.exe</file_name> <main_program/> </file_ref> </app_version> </app_info> |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Example app_info.xml
(Message 56285)
Posted 24 Nov 2012 by Nick Post: Could someone please provide me with an example app_info.xml file that will allow me to run both standard CPU tasks as well as multiple cuda tasks on an Nvidia board? With no app_info.xml I get cpu tasks but only 1 cuda task. When I add a app_info.xml file such as I've seen here, I can run multiple cuda tasks but no cpu tasks. How can I run multiple instances of both? Thanks, Nick |
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
GPU Requirements
(Message 56206)
Posted 15 Nov 2012 by Nick Post: No need for anyone to respond. I found the answer on another thread. |
14)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
GPU Requirements
(Message 56205)
Posted 15 Nov 2012 by Nick Post: I have an Nvidia GTX650 Ti and it's running a GPU task just fine. Is it possible to run multiple instances of MilkyWay@Home 1.2 (Opend_nvidia) like I can on Seti? Nick |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
MilkyWay tasks always on high priority
(Message 54136)
Posted 24 Apr 2012 by Nick Post: Please see this thread for information and possible solutions, but let's keep the discussion here. Thanks. Do the BOINC people concur that this is a bug and plan to fix it soon? |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
MilkyWay tasks always on high priority
(Message 54131)
Posted 24 Apr 2012 by Nick Post: Who actually assigns the high priority designation? Is it BOINC or does the application itself do it? |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New BOINC Manager = no MWAH WUs
(Message 54071)
Posted 19 Apr 2012 by Nick Post: Thanks for your help. |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New BOINC Manager = no MWAH WUs
(Message 54062)
Posted 18 Apr 2012 by Nick Post: My machine was happily crunching away steady numbers of WUs until I over-installed BOINC 7.0.25. Same thing here. No WUs since installing 7.0.25 |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New BOINC Manager = no MWAH WUs
(Message 54061)
Posted 18 Apr 2012 by Nick Post: Can you tell me where I can get a sample cc_config.xml file? |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Am I doing something wrong regarding resource share?
(Message 33943)
Posted 29 Nov 2009 by Nick Post: I wonder if my problem is related. I have a Quadcore system and I am running SETI@Home, Cosmology@Home and Milkyway@Home. SETI@Home uses only the GPU with both Cosmology@Home and Milkyway@Home set to only use the CPUs. Seti@Home is set to use 50% of the resources and the other two set to use 25% of the resources, yet Milkyway@Home will not run unless I suspend Cosmology@Home. Any one have any idea what's wrong? |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group