41)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2636)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Personally I don't have a problem with what the granted credit has been set to. I'm staying, and so is my overclocked CPU. |
42)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2630)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Personally I don't have a problem with what the granted credit has been set to. I'm staying, and so is my overclocked CPU. Just curious Cappy, what do you think the $$$ will be to have it built, that will be a screamer. |
43)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2628)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Personally I don't have a problem with what the granted credit has been set to. I'm staying, and so is my overclocked CPU. You won't have problems getting WU's. |
44)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2624)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Before I take the last computer off of this project in 5 minutes, I would like to let you know why I am leaving..If you really care. I couldn't have said it better. |
45)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2618)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: I agree that granted credit was too high before (although I enjoyed it) and is too low now. Some of my 64 bit Linux boxes are now getting less than claimed, while they get more than claimed on other projects with 64bit applications. Well said Yoda. |
46)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2615)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Not many complained about getting shorted credit before the optimizations. So why gripe now when the credit is rougly the same as it was then. The wu's were cut down to 1/3 and the credit 1/3(approx.). I think I was quite clear with my explanation, if I wasn't I'll take another stab at it. I currently have the project set on 'no new WU's' and it will stay as such for the foreseeable near future. |
47)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2607)
Posted 24 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: I just got my first (and last) WU with the new and improved credit. Let me help clarify so I can resolve any confusion you may have. With the possible exception of a couple of BOINC projects, they are all worth while projects contributing useful information to the community. Having said that, I have crunched for about 15 different projects at one time or another and some much more than others. Since I don't have a 'pet' project any longer since SETI went wacko, I like to bounce around to the top 3 or so projects that have optimized apps that allow me to pick up a few extra cobblestones. All the projects I crunch for are trying to, as you say, 'answer important questions'. If you believe that to be, as you said, 'selfish', that's an opinion you are entitled to. Happy Easter. |
48)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2604)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: 2.17 is a bit too low... it's just in the range of what the clients claim and these original benchmark based credits are much lower than the average. I agree, they payouts should be based on the standard applications, not the optimized ones. As far as what I was thinking this would level out at was in the 4.5 - 5.0 range which I think is still too low when you're looking at what the standard app would be receiving. Crunch3r, as far as your calculations go, they look correct to me. |
49)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2589)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: I just got my first (and last) WU with the new and improved credit. I enjoyed the short time I crunched here but I must bid my farewell. That type of payout is not acceptable. Enjoy everyone until such time as it (if it is) corrected. Happy Easter :) |
50)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Milestones
(Message 2588)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Nice going on your 120K :) |
51)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2587)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: i just hope that you don't based lowering credits on the stats of http://boinc.netsoft-online.com/e107_plugins/boinc/get_cpcs.php cuz that data is flawed wich has already been proven to be fact. You should see all the turmoil they're dealing with over there. If they are the standard then BOINC projects are in trouble, lol. |
52)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
updated granted credit
(Message 2584)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: i just hope that you don't based lowering credits on the stats of http://boinc.netsoft-online.com/e107_plugins/boinc/get_cpcs.php cuz that data is flawed wich has already been proven to be fact. "A bit too much"? Waaaaay tooo much, what happened to baby steps!!! |
53)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
More Work !!! Please :)
(Message 2554)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Thanks Travis :) |
54)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Milestones
(Message 2553)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: nice going everyone |
55)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
new searches started
(Message 2551)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Thanks Travis |
56)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
More Work !!! Please :)
(Message 2543)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Looks like were out of work :( Hopefully some soon. |
57)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Forums Useable but not in Good Condition!
(Message 2542)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: I have never been able to upload an avatar here :( I see you got one working, time to add mine :) |
58)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Milestones
(Message 2541)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Passed 15,000. But I am getting blown by on the stats position. Congrats on the 15K. |
59)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Milestones
(Message 2537)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Nice going DoctorNow. |
60)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
More Work !!! Please :)
(Message 2536)
Posted 23 Mar 2008 by Philadelphia Post: Looks like were out of work :( |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group