Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
milkyway code releases
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 08 Posts: 178 Credit: 6,140,854 RAC: 0 |
Getting the same thing here now, 1500WUs reported ready to sent at the time of this writing. Just trying to use the new 0.4 app, although I was getting the same error with my 0.3 app. All right, good to know it's not me. :P |
Send message Joined: 27 Mar 08 Posts: 5 Credit: 2,232,048 RAC: 0 |
Hi all. I compiled the code (version 0.4) in a PIV running Ubuntu Hardy. When I got a WU, it just error with this message: <core_client_version>6.2.15</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 22 (0x16, -234) </message> <stderr_txt> </stderr_txt> ]]> Any ideas? |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 08 Posts: 1 Credit: 725,308 RAC: 0 |
MilkyWay Client is not working on 64bit Ubuntu Linux 2.6.27-7 on AMD Quad-Core Opteron 1352. I recieve a computational error on all WU's. Got the same thing on my Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 running 64bit Ubuntu Linux 2.6.27-7. Any Ideas? Jodyman |
Send message Joined: 27 Mar 08 Posts: 5 Credit: 2,232,048 RAC: 0 |
Forgot to add a piece of info --> the message from BOINC Manager: Thu 27 Nov 2008 21:10:38 WET|Milkyway@home|Computation for task gs_628_1227904862_33569_0 finished Thu 27 Nov 2008 21:10:38 WET|Milkyway@home|Output file gs_628_1227904862_33569_0_0 for task gs_628_1227904862_33569_0 absent Oh, and it's a 32bit machine. |
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 08 Posts: 178 Credit: 6,140,854 RAC: 0 |
Getting the same thing here now, 1500WUs reported ready to sent at the time of this writing. Just trying to use the new 0.4 app, although I was getting the same error with my 0.3 app. Still not me? 6700 WUs ready to send, still getting the "No Work Sent" error message, in red no less. As if it isn't obnoxious enough already... >_> |
Send message Joined: 27 Mar 08 Posts: 5 Credit: 2,232,048 RAC: 0 |
I can get work, but all WUs error out. I tried with both 0.3 and 0.4 versions and always get the same error message. I must be doing something wrong... This is the app_info.xml file I'm using: <app_info> <app> <name>milkyway</name> </app> <file_info> <name>milkyway_0.4_i686-pc-linux-gnu</name> <executable/> </file_info> <app_version> <app_name>milkyway</app_name> <version_num>0.4</version_num> <file_ref> <file_name>milkyway_0.4_i686-pc-linux-gnu</file_name> <main_program/> </file_ref> </app_version> </app_info> Should the app name be different or something? |
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 08 Posts: 178 Credit: 6,140,854 RAC: 0 |
Just to be thorough here too, here's my latest app_info. Still gives the No Work Sent message. <app_info> <app> <name>milkyway</name> <user_friendly_name>MilkyWay@Home Optimized</user_friendly_name> </app> <file_info> <name>milkyway_0.4_i686_apple_darwin</name> <executable/> </file_info> <app_version> <app_name>milkyway</app_name> <version_num>41</version_num> <platform>i686-apple-darwin</platform> <api_version>6.3.1</api_version> <file_ref> <file_name>milkyway_0.4_i686_apple_darwin</file_name> <main_program/> </file_ref> </app_version> </app_info> It has tabs too for readability, but they don't show up in [ code ] tags. |
Send message Joined: 27 Mar 08 Posts: 5 Credit: 2,232,048 RAC: 0 |
I'm getting WUs now, and they are crunching fine. Finished one in 25m37s using version 0.4 of the code downloaded from the site (i.e., not compiled in my computer by myself) and my app_info.xml previously posted. Machine is a Pentium IV 3GHz, 1GB RAM, running Ubuntu Hardy 32bit. One question: The original application used to blaze to completion after passing the 50% mark. This one doesn't. Is this to be expected? |
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 08 Posts: 178 Credit: 6,140,854 RAC: 0 |
Getting the same thing here now, 1500WUs reported ready to sent at the time of this writing. Just trying to use the new 0.4 app, although I was getting the same error with my 0.3 app. It was me... although not directly. Somehow, the "Run test applications" preference got reset to No, even though I know for a fact I had set it to Yes. Anyway, WUs downloaded, crunching with 0.4. |
Send message Joined: 18 Nov 08 Posts: 2 Credit: 40,115 RAC: 0 |
512 hour to crunch and the deadline is 4 Dec ? I already delete this task :D |
Send message Joined: 18 Nov 08 Posts: 2 Credit: 40,115 RAC: 0 |
sorry, its 590 hour :D screenshot here : http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/5927/54557310le6.jpg |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
sorry, its 590 hour :D boinc is probably estimating the time wrong. if you let a few of them run it should fix it. |
Send message Joined: 28 Aug 07 Posts: 31 Credit: 86,152,236 RAC: 0 |
boinc is probably estimating the time wrong. if you let a few of them run it should fix it. It is expected behaviour. When someone runs opt app, duration correction factor (DCF) makes estimation of run times correct. But when estimation on project side comes within reasonable times again (ie. stock app with good task estimation), DCF still takes place. You can eighter manually reset DCF to 1 or let BOINC to correct itself - but it would take some times as Travis mentioned. BOINC Project specifications and hardware requirements |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 |
OK... after the last update of the zip files v0.6 works now on windows but only on nm_stripe_79. It doesn't work on nm_stripe_86 and crashes here "current_probs = ia->r_steps * ia->mu_steps * ia->nu_steps;" That's due to the fact that the app cannot get/read input for "stream_integrals" :( Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
Send message Joined: 13 Nov 08 Posts: 13 Credit: 13,533,846 RAC: 0 |
My PC's are all out of work and the server keeps sending a message back of "No Work Sent".. I've reset the project and was hoping it would just download the files I need for the new app (assuming they are required now), but it's not working... How do you compile the new app in for Windows? |
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 08 Posts: 1734 Credit: 64,228,409 RAC: 0 |
I run a Win XP Pro quad and I detached from MW (having completed all WUs) and then reattached. All client files and work downloaded OK. |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 |
OK... after the last update of the zip files v0.6 works now on windows but only on nm_stripe_79. to reply to myself.... double calculate_progress(EVALUATION_STATE *s) { [color=red]long[/color] total_calc_probs, current_calc_probs, current_probs, i; INTEGRAL_AREA *ia; total_calc_probs = 0; current_calc_probs = 0; for (i = -1; i < s->number_cuts; i++) { if (i == -1) ia = s->main_integral; else ia = s->cuts[i]; current_probs = ia->r_steps * ia->mu_steps * ia->nu_steps; total_calc_probs += current_probs; if (i < s->current_cut) { current_calc_probs += current_probs; } else if (i == s->current_cut) { current_calc_probs += ia->r_step_current + (ia->nu_step_current * ia->r_steps) + (ia->mu_step_current * ia->nu_steps * ia->r_steps); } } total_calc_probs += s->total_stars; current_calc_probs += s->current_star_point; return (double)current_calc_probs / (double)total_calc_probs; } What's "s" ? Shouldn't that be "es" ? And the red one will get you into trouble when compiling linux/unix 64 bit apps if you're assumption that "sizeof(long) = 8" which isn't true... gcc on an x64 system, sizeof(long) = 8 windows on an x64 system, sizeof(long) = 4 Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
Send message Joined: 13 Nov 08 Posts: 13 Credit: 13,533,846 RAC: 0 |
I run a Win XP Pro quad and I detached from MW (having completed all WUs) and then reattached. All client files and work downloaded OK. I just did that and it worked... it says it's running the Optimised 0.04 app though, shouldn't it say 0.06? |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
I run a Win XP Pro quad and I detached from MW (having completed all WUs) and then reattached. All client files and work downloaded OK. We havent updated the windows version to 0.6 yet (still waiting on Dave, i think he has a class project due today). Hopefully it should be out soon. |
Send message Joined: 13 Nov 08 Posts: 13 Credit: 13,533,846 RAC: 0 |
Gotcha. Will we have to detach from the project and reattach again or will it work automatically? |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group