Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.
____________
/ 
Reply
Quote
Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.
Looking forward to it Travis, but right now I have this;
27/02/2009 16:31:35|Milkyway@home|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance
No work availabilty just now
[edit] I just got a task. Whooohoooo! :)
____________
/ Reply
Quote
Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.
Looking forward to it Travis, but right now I have this;
27/02/2009 16:31:35|Milkyway@home|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance
No work availabilty just now
Yeah, I just restarted the server :P Work should start flowing now.
____________
/ Reply
Quote
Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.
Not really
27/02/2009 17:34:31 Milkyway@home Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
27/02/2009 17:34:31 Milkyway@home Reporting 1 completed tasks, requesting new tasks
27/02/2009 17:34:36 Milkyway@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
27/02/2009 17:35:07 Milkyway@home Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
27/02/2009 17:35:07 Milkyway@home Requesting new tasks
27/02/2009 17:35:12 Milkyway@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
:(
/ Reply
Quote
Still nothing here.
/ Reply
Quote
Let me know if the increase queue size helps at all with the work availability.
Looking forward to it Travis, but right now I have this;
27/02/2009 16:31:35|Milkyway@home|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance
No work availabilty just now
Yeah, I just restarted the server :P Work should start flowing now.
Yes, I just got a task, but no more;
27/02/2009 16:36:26|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 1745280 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
27/02/2009 16:36:32|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
____________
/ Reply
Quote
Hmmm...
Insta-Purge seems to back to. :-(
UGGGHHH! PITA time again for data logging.
<edit> It seems to me that if you cannot even accommodate a 1 hour delay in purging the completed tasks, then you have a serious overbooking and/or backend capacity problem that allowing more work out in the field is not going to help one iota.
Alinator
/ Reply
Quote
Nothing at all since that one task;
27/02/2009 16:43:14|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
____________
/ Reply
Quote
> got 49 WU's on one machine, 50 WU's on another but these are the exception... mostly '0 new tasks' after repeated manual primes...
/ Reply
Quote
It's gonna take the server awhile to catch up I think. Give it a little time :)
____________
/ Reply
Quote
Well I haven't been following their work feeder problem that closely. However, in general BOINC terms, if you cannot transition enough work fast enough into the schedulers limited size queue, then this is what you end up seeing even if there is plenty of tasks coming out of the work generator(s).
Alinator
/ Reply
Quote
Just got 80 for the Quad.
____________
/ Reply
Quote
OK, I just got a bunch through. It was quite a shock to see so many :P
____________
/ Reply
Quote
OK, I just got a bunch through. It was quite a shock to see so many :P
Change can be good :)
/ Reply
Quote
Yup, the new limit came down right away on two machines with one manual update. Looks good so far.
/ Reply
Quote
Well I haven't been following their work feeder problem that closely. However, in general BOINC terms, if you cannot transition enough work fast enough into the schedulers limited size queue, then this is what you end up seeing even if there is plenty of tasks coming out of the work generator(s).
Alinator
Yeah, I'm thinking this might be the problem. Now I just have to figure out how to increase the scheduler's queue size.
____________
/ Reply
Quote
I'm not seeing a reduction in the amount of '0 new tasks' and am not hitting the WU download limit.
/ Reply
Quote
Sitting idle here ... sigh ... when I checked the server page it said 500 available ... now 437 ... refetch master file, still nothing ...
ARRRRGGGGGHHHHH!
idle ATI GPU ... man this is depressing ...
/ Reply
Quote
Nearly 80 new WU here aswell.
/ Reply
Quote
I'm wondering if one could code a script which would request an update at say 15 second intervals automatically -- that would eventually get work, of course hammering the server might not have the right effect if such a script got out in the wild....
____________
/ Reply
Quote