Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problem ATI v0.2 and Win7?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Feb 09 Posts: 109 Credit: 11,089,510 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
<Double post from page load problems.> |
![]() Send message Joined: 13 Jul 08 Posts: 33 Credit: 21,285,010 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Specs: Boinc 6.10.4, HD4850, 64bit Win7. driver 9.9 0.20 work fine but need CUT - <coproc> <type>ATI</type> <count>1</count> </coproc> for run 3 WU at same time |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Oct 08 Posts: 18 Credit: 164,409,593 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
KoDak Set <count>0.33</count> And boinc run 3 WU at same time |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Oct 08 Posts: 18 Credit: 164,409,593 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
double post |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Feb 09 Posts: 999 Credit: 74,932,619 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
I run <coproc> <type>ATI</type> <count>0.50</count> </coproc> as 2 seems more efficient on my 4830. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Am getting a few Computation Errors after 1 second here and there, but most WUs seem to be going thru OK. No need to move backwards to 6.10.3 ;) Try the 6.10.5 client (works like a charm here). All bugs of 6.10.3 & 6.10.4 are fixed in that version. Windows 64 bit ->boinc_6.10.5_x64.zip Windows 32 bit ->boinc_6.10.5_x32.zip ![]() Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Feb 09 Posts: 158 Credit: 110,699,054 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Am getting a few Computation Errors after 1 second here and there, but most WUs seem to be going thru OK. It did go crazy and downloaded a TON of WCG WUs.... I mean like 2 weeks' work, when my queue data is set to 0.5 days. Edit: Correction, it is set to 0.10 days of queue.... and its still getting more. >_< |
![]() Send message Joined: 12 Apr 08 Posts: 621 Credit: 161,934,067 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
It did go crazy and downloaded a TON of WCG WUs.... I mean like 2 weeks' work, when my queue data is set to 0.5 days. Wasn't that the main issue with 6.10.0 through 6.10.2? Or was that the problem with 6.10.4 ... lord I am getting lost with all these issues ... With Vista 32 and 6.10.3 I have a reasonable WCG queue (my other project on the Q9300) to use the CPU while running GPU MW tasks on the HD4870 I have ... Oh, I have mine set to 1 day extra ... 70 days or so and I should have Turquoise for all active projects but CEP ... one down, several to go ... :) |
Send message Joined: 31 Jan 09 Posts: 31 Credit: 69,908,565 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Will not install, is this the x86 ver ![]() |
Send message Joined: 31 Mar 08 Posts: 61 Credit: 18,325,284 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Cat 9.9, win 7 32 bit, 4870x2, boinc 6.10, and ati 0.2 .. Main problem is choppy video graphics playback and GUI compared with the very smooth video and GUI which was completly not noticable slowdowns in previous setups. Edited app_info when it comes to the F tag and N tag, 1 concurrent work unit or higher/lower frequency rates had little to no effect on video performance! I heavily use my computer as a media center and don't wish to pause the application while the computer is in use! Rollback? Is it expected due to the code rewrite which emphasizes app performance over everything else? Anyone else experience this? |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Aug 07 Posts: 327 Credit: 116,463,193 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Cat 9.9, win 7 32 bit, 4870x2, boinc 6.10, and ati 0.2 .. Have you tried the W tag? Try increasing it above the default "1" to 1.1 or 1.2. ![]() Calm Chaos Forum...Join Calm Chaos Now |
Send message Joined: 31 Mar 08 Posts: 61 Credit: 18,325,284 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the tip, I've resolved the issue by matching the F tag with my monitor's refresh rate, at 85 hz. My TV runs at 30hz, now the gui is fluid smooth and so is video playback! I've reset w and n to their defaults since they have little effect compared with F. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Feb 09 Posts: 158 Credit: 110,699,054 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
It did go crazy and downloaded a TON of WCG WUs.... I mean like 2 weeks' work, when my queue data is set to 0.5 days. I ran .1, .2 .3 and .4, none of them went crazy like this. :( I had to abort a bunch of units, as there was no way my machine could do it. With a rough estimate, it downloaded near 30 days worth of work, all with 10 day deadlines. So no, the bugs are not fixed in 6.10.5. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 08 Posts: 165 Credit: 364,966 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Did that a few days ago as yet have seen no invalid results her using the new ver 0.20 sse3 cpu app.. So it would appear that all is good so far.. |
©2025 Astroinformatics Group