de_14_3s_free_5... shows no progress on 0.20 CPU client

Author	Message
Cluster Physik Send message Joined: 26 Jul 08 Posts: 627 Credit: 94,940,203 RAC: 0	Message 37477 - Posted: 18 Mar 2010, 2:22:43 UTC - in response to Message 37467. Last modified: 18 Mar 2010, 2:23:02 UTC To the best of my knowledge the 0.19 SSSE3 opt app has not been updated (in fact there does not even appear to be a version 0.20 for SSSE3). Yes, the reason is simply that the 0.20 SSE3 version should be slightly faster than the 0.19 SSSE3 version ;) Btw., I will try to compile CPU versions with a fixed progress bar during the weekend. ID: 37477 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

arkayn Send message Joined: 14 Feb 09 Posts: 999 Credit: 74,932,619 RAC: 0	Message 37479 - Posted: 18 Mar 2010, 3:31:44 UTC - in response to Message 37477. And I will get them up just as soon as they are released. ID: 37479 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Brian Silvers Send message Joined: 21 Aug 08 Posts: 625 Credit: 558,425 RAC: 0	Message 37731 - Posted: 24 Mar 2010, 21:37:27 UTC - in response to Message 37477. Btw., I will try to compile CPU versions with a fixed progress bar during the weekend. Any progress on this? Thanks... ID: 37731 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Cluster Physik Send message Joined: 26 Jul 08 Posts: 627 Credit: 94,940,203 RAC: 0	Message 37734 - Posted: 24 Mar 2010, 23:38:40 UTC - in response to Message 37731. Btw., I will try to compile CPU versions with a fixed progress bar during the weekend. Any progress on this? Thanks... Sorry, was busy with other stuff. What about next weekend? The fix is really simple, I just need a free one hour time slot to compile the stuff for the five targets currently supported, do a short test on each, and to adapt the app_info.xml files. ID: 37734 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Brian Silvers Send message Joined: 21 Aug 08 Posts: 625 Credit: 558,425 RAC: 0	Message 37754 - Posted: 25 Mar 2010, 19:43:43 UTC - in response to Message 37734. Btw., I will try to compile CPU versions with a fixed progress bar during the weekend. Any progress on this? Thanks... Sorry, was busy with other stuff. What about next weekend? The fix is really simple, I just need a free one hour time slot to compile the stuff for the five targets currently supported, do a short test on each, and to adapt the app_info.xml files. "Next weekend" as in 2 days from now, or as in 9 days from now? Without the progress percentage, those of us with CPU apps are somewhat "flying blind", hoping that we do not have a bad task. So far everything has been ok, but will it continue that way? ID: 37754 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 37756 - Posted: 25 Mar 2010, 22:45:36 UTC - in response to Message 37754. Btw., I will try to compile CPU versions with a fixed progress bar during the weekend. Any progress on this? Thanks... Sorry, was busy with other stuff. What about next weekend? The fix is really simple, I just need a free one hour time slot to compile the stuff for the five targets currently supported, do a short test on each, and to adapt the app_info.xml files. "Next weekend" as in 2 days from now, or as in 9 days from now? Without the progress percentage, those of us with CPU apps are somewhat "flying blind", hoping that we do not have a bad task. So far everything has been ok, but will it continue that way? The ps_13_3s count fine for me. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. ID: 37756 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Brian Silvers Send message Joined: 21 Aug 08 Posts: 625 Credit: 558,425 RAC: 0	Message 37760 - Posted: 26 Mar 2010, 4:14:16 UTC - in response to Message 37756. Last modified: 26 Mar 2010, 4:18:59 UTC Btw., I will try to compile CPU versions with a fixed progress bar during the weekend. Any progress on this? Thanks... Sorry, was busy with other stuff. What about next weekend? The fix is really simple, I just need a free one hour time slot to compile the stuff for the five targets currently supported, do a short test on each, and to adapt the app_info.xml files. "Next weekend" as in 2 days from now, or as in 9 days from now? Without the progress percentage, those of us with CPU apps are somewhat "flying blind", hoping that we do not have a bad task. So far everything has been ok, but will it continue that way? The ps_13_3s count fine for me. I'll check that out then... I've been doing Cosmo on this system for the past few days... The other computer is running in service mode and I don't feel like looking at it right now... :/ Edit: Yeah, ps_13_3s_const_v3_5087818_1269576799_0 is working ok... Still, if the project sends out whatever tasks that caused it not to work properly, that case needs to be fixed, unless those types of tasks were not supposed to come from the project. :shrug: All I know is I pulled my AMD off and switched to Cosmo while I waited and semi-monitored my Intel... ID: 37760 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Cluster Physik Send message Joined: 26 Jul 08 Posts: 627 Credit: 94,940,203 RAC: 0	Message 37827 - Posted: 29 Mar 2010, 0:44:28 UTC - in response to Message 37754. Btw., I will try to compile CPU versions with a fixed progress bar during the weekend. Any progress on this? Sorry, was busy with other stuff. What about next weekend? "Next weekend" as in 2 days from now, or as in 9 days from now? Without the progress percentage, those of us with CPU apps are somewhat "flying blind", hoping that we do not have a bad task. So far everything has been ok, but will it continue that way? Next weekend as today (or yesterday here actually). The updated version is here. Hope it works okay now. ID: 37827 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Bruce Send message Joined: 28 Apr 08 Posts: 1415 Credit: 2,716,428 RAC: 0	Message 37830 - Posted: 29 Mar 2010, 2:02:46 UTC - in response to Message 37827. Thanx fer your time n' efforts CP!! ID: 37830 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote