Welcome to MilkyWay@home

New WUs - Complete, can't validate?

Message boards : Number crunching : New WUs - Complete, can't validate?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Donnie
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 08
Posts: 67
Credit: 272,086,462
RAC: 0
Message 38017 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010, 0:13:05 UTC
Last modified: 5 Apr 2010, 0:19:54 UTC

Are these only test units just to verify the validator? I've had 2 issues with them - Completed, validation inconclusive and when the consensus does come in, I get - Completed, can't validate due to the settings of - max # of error/total/success tasks 1, 6, 1 errors Too many success results
ID: 38017 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
CTAPbIi

Send message
Joined: 4 Jan 10
Posts: 86
Credit: 51,753,924
RAC: 0
Message 38075 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010, 10:50:37 UTC
Last modified: 5 Apr 2010, 10:53:47 UTC

even worse - "Completed, can't validate" with zero credit. what the hell?
ID: 38075 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Pwrguru

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 08
Posts: 24
Credit: 250,053,699
RAC: 0
Message 38076 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010, 10:52:49 UTC

Something isn't working right....
ID: 38076 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Zydor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Feb 09
Posts: 620
Credit: 100,587,625
RAC: 0
Message 38078 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010, 11:11:24 UTC
Last modified: 5 Apr 2010, 11:15:49 UTC

ID: 38078 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stick

Send message
Joined: 8 Oct 07
Posts: 52
Credit: 5,635,230
RAC: 137
Message 38082 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010, 11:23:30 UTC
Last modified: 5 Apr 2010, 11:28:05 UTC

IMO, the logic behind the "Too many error results, Too many total results" circuitbreaker and/or Milkway's "3, 6, 1" threshholding of it, is flawed. That is, once the "circuitbreaker" is triggered, any (as yet unreturned), "In progess" results appear to be excluded from consideration, despite the fact that they could be "valid". That doesn't make sense - especially on a project where only one valid result is required.

At least, that seems to be the case with ps_13_3s_const_v2_5688232_1269636198 and Task 95459389 (mine) which lists its "Validate state" as: "Workunit error - check skipped".

EDIT: Sorry - I didn't see the other thread until after I posted here.
ID: 38082 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile David Glogau*
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 09
Posts: 172
Credit: 645,240,165
RAC: 0
Message 38083 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010, 11:24:50 UTC

Just checked my results. I have over 1000+ which have not validated.

Seems like about a 20% failure rate over the completed ones.
Also got heaps as inconclusive, so things might change as we go.

Travis is on to it, so things will work out in the end.

Regards
ID: 38083 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stick

Send message
Joined: 8 Oct 07
Posts: 52
Credit: 5,635,230
RAC: 137
Message 38101 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010, 16:23:04 UTC - in response to Message 38082.  

I suggest that "DB purging" be suspended until this "Too many errors . . ." problem is fixed. Else, a lot of work will be lost. The WU I reported (below) is already gone.

IMO, the logic behind the "Too many error results, Too many total results" circuitbreaker and/or Milkway's "3, 6, 1" threshholding of it, is flawed. That is, once the "circuitbreaker" is triggered, any (as yet unreturned), "In progess" results appear to be excluded from consideration, despite the fact that they could be "valid". That doesn't make sense - especially on a project where only one valid result is required.

At least, that seems to be the case with ps_13_3s_const_v2_5688232_1269636198 and Task 95459389 (mine) which lists its "Validate state" as: "Workunit error - check skipped".

EDIT: Sorry - I didn't see the other thread until after I posted here.

ID: 38101 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Dan T. Morris
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Mar 08
Posts: 165
Credit: 410,228,216
RAC: 0
Message 38111 - Posted: 5 Apr 2010, 17:33:53 UTC

I am getting a lot of these..

DD,

<core_client_version>6.10.36</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Running Milkyway@home ATI GPU application version 0.20b (Win64, CAL 1.4) by Gipsel
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: -np
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 20
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: -p
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 0.8131935629570660000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 8.5161548212469430000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: -1.1780421318022150000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 170.3258800342236400000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 22.4470822186396650000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 0.2629632502059480000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 6.0421462150014010000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 4.6010011677850150000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: -1.5756575205385368000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 154.8731425030765000000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 18.4402261956227560000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 4.0265024652404140000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 5.0916863847601270000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 19.6568110079780500000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: -16.8451942358860260000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 230.0931547168204600000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 31.7470334331690330000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 0.0000000000000000000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 0.0000000000000000000000000
ignoring unknown input argument in app_info.xml: 17.0962754025640400000000000
instructed by BOINC client to use device 0
CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) 9600 Quad-Core Processor (4 cores/threads) 2.30012 GHz (342ms)

CAL Runtime: 1.4.515
Found 1 CAL device

Device 0: ATI Radeon HD4700/4800 (RV740/RV770) 512 MB local RAM (remote 64 MB cached + 1024 MB uncached)
GPU core clock: 765 MHz, memory clock: 950 MHz
800 shader units organized in 10 SIMDs with 16 VLIW units (5-issue), wavefront size 64 threads
supporting double precision

Starting WU on GPU 0

main integral, 640 iterations
predicted runtime per iteration is 275 ms (33.3333 ms are allowed), dividing each iteration in 9 parts
borders of the domains at 0 184 360 536 712 888 1072 1248 1424 1600
Calculated about 3.28897e+013 floatingpoint ops on GPU, 2.47165e+008 on FPU. Approximate GPU time 184.781 seconds.

probability calculation (stars)
Calculated about 3.34818e+009 floatingpoint ops on FPU.

WU completed.
CPU time: 8.39063 seconds, GPU time: 184.781 seconds, wall clock time: 186.542 seconds, CPU frequency: 2.30016 GHz

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Validate state Initial
Claimed credit 0.846776257001705
Granted credit 0
application version MilkyWay@Home v0.21 (ati13ati)
ID: 38111 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : New WUs - Complete, can't validate?

©2024 Astroinformatics Group