Waiting for validation...
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Waiting for validation...
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 12 Aug 09 Posts: 262 Credit: 92,631,041 RAC: 0  
|
I have still two pages with this ones. Some from April 22. They have run with: MilkyWay@Home Version 3 v0.03 (cuda23). So I think Travis has to give credit for it to us, or he have to delete all of them soonest to clear up disk space. Greetings from, TJ |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 08 Posts: 520 Credit: 302,528,469 RAC: 184   
|
This looks very much like the same problem that showed up two weeks ago. I was hoping to see it resolved this morning, but I bet Travis is out of town again.... 
|
 banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0  
|
Summer vacation? Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. |
|
banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0
|
Seems to be some problems still. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. |
|
banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0
|
Validator is having problems. 6k+ units now waiting. I have two since it came back that are waiting, but 3 went through immediately just now. Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. |
|
Send message Joined: 12 Aug 09 Posts: 262 Credit: 92,631,041 RAC: 0
|
Validator is having problems. 6k+ units now waiting. I have two since it came back that are waiting, but 3 went through immediately just now. Yeah but that are relative "young" WU's or not? We are talking about WU's ready from April, May... still waiting for credits, or they need still be calcualted by another computer, as there was an eroor, or just only one was issued out for crunching. Travis has to do something with it. Greetings from, TJ |
52 Aces Send message Joined: 13 Sep 09 Posts: 1 Credit: 300,022 RAC: 0 
|
|
The Gas Giant Send message Joined: 24 Dec 07 Posts: 1947 Credit: 240,884,648 RAC: 0 
|
|
David Glogau* Send message Joined: 12 Aug 09 Posts: 172 Credit: 645,240,165 RAC: 0 
|
I've got these two that have been waiting 90 days to validate. What do I win? Such impatience! My two from 5 April beat both of you! 87978578 90147952 And one from 7th April 89614629 One more from 8th April87276724 No need to detach, they will clear in time.  |
uBronan Send message Joined: 9 Feb 09 Posts: 166 Credit: 27,520,813 RAC: 0 
|
On my systems the list of pending is growing Now i am clueless since some just end up in the list of pending while the next just get rewarded as usual And guys on this project pending is weird, this project don't need a wingman for control since its a double precision project ... So no check by another user needed if the calculation was done well Its new, its relative fast... my new bicycle |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Apr 10 Posts: 49 Credit: 171,863,025 RAC: 0  
|
I have 3 waiting for validation from May the numbers are as follows 96109938 95566900 96532057 Waiting patiently |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Nov 09 Posts: 108 Credit: 430,760,953 RAC: 0
|
And guys on this project pending is weird, this project don't need a wingman for control since its a double precision project ... So no check by another user needed if the calculation was done well If you look back several months, you will find thousands of WU's that were not calculated as accurately as they should have been. Subtle bug in the ATI client vs. the 5800 series of boards. |
|
Send message Joined: 12 Aug 09 Posts: 262 Credit: 92,631,041 RAC: 0
|
If you look back several months, you will find thousands of WU's that were not calculated as accurately as they should have been. Subtle bug in the ATI client vs. the 5800 series of boards. That could be true, but I have a lot of WU's from months ago and where done with nVidia cuda. Wingman used ATI or even CPU. A lot of these WU's have at least two "good" results, but we (wingman and me) are not getting the credits for it. Travis really have to look at this and, -or give the credits and clear the database, -or clear the database without credit. I have mentioned this many times. Greetings from, TJ |
|
Send message Joined: 28 May 10 Posts: 8 Credit: 439,056 RAC: 0
|
That could be true, but I have a lot of WU's from months ago and where done with nVidia cuda. Wingman used ATI or even CPU. A lot of these WU's have at least two "good" results, but we (wingman and me) are not getting the credits for it. I have not been using Milkyway that long but have always been puzzled by the waiting for validation element of the server status page as it never goes below approx 6200 - 6300. Also you would have thought it would vary with wu in the field and wu to be assimilated and the variability of users returning wu on an ad hoc basis Could this possibly be that the validator just keeps missing the completed wu as TJ describes or will only look at new entries hence why there is a base level it does not go below and cant clear the 6000+ backlog? From reading the forums there has it appears been problems with the validator in the past which may (or may not) be a clue All speculation on my part and could be shouting up the incorrect tree on this :) |
|
uBronan Send message Joined: 9 Feb 09 Posts: 166 Credit: 27,520,813 RAC: 0
|
Well everyday i see some more added to te list with : Checked, but no consensus yet It really needs attention or the list will become huge Its new, its relative fast... my new bicycle |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group