Welcome to MilkyWay@home

Error report

Message boards : Number crunching : Error report
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Ensor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Nov 07
Posts: 20
Credit: 39,712
RAC: 0
Message 1353 - Posted: 5 Jan 2008, 2:11:06 UTC
Last modified: 5 Jan 2008, 2:18:55 UTC

Just a quick note to report that it appears that Milkyway WUs don't appear to appreciate being suspended....

Earlier this evening BOINC on my host suspended WU #1883917 in order to run it's weekly benchmarks, said WU immediately errored out.

Here's the appropriate extract from BOINC's log:

04/01/2008 18:46:03||Running CPU benchmarks
04/01/2008 18:46:03||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
04/01/2008 18:46:13|Milkyway@home|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
04/01/2008 18:46:13|Milkyway@home|Reason: Unrecoverable error for result gs_90_1199516100_135551_0 (One or more arguments are invalid (0x80000003) - exit code -2147483645 (0x80000003))
04/01/2008 18:46:13|Milkyway@home|Computation for task gs_90_1199516100_135551_0 finished
04/01/2008 18:46:13|Milkyway@home|Output file gs_90_1199516100_135551_0_0 for task gs_90_1199516100_135551_0 absent


Not a big problem for me, but I just thought you should know.


TTFN - Pete.


ID: 1353 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Misfit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 07
Posts: 915
Credit: 1,503,319
RAC: 0
Message 1362 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 7:56:00 UTC - in response to Message 1353.  

Just a quick note to report that it appears that Milkyway WUs don't appear to appreciate being suspended....

Some still crash when BOINC is snoozed and one is actively running
me@rescam.org
ID: 1362 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Travis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
Message 1368 - Posted: 6 Jan 2008, 17:41:35 UTC - in response to Message 1362.  

Just a quick note to report that it appears that Milkyway WUs don't appear to appreciate being suspended....

Some still crash when BOINC is snoozed and one is actively running


Yeah we've seen this a bit, still trying to figure out why.
ID: 1368 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
KWSN Sir Clark

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 07
Posts: 4
Credit: 31,551
RAC: 0
Message 1524 - Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 11:17:31 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jan 2008, 11:21:55 UTC

I had this and boinc wasn't snoozing:


17/01/2008 08:11:08|World Community Grid|Restarting task ll784_00023_5 using hpf2 version 518
17/01/2008 09:25:10|Einstein@Home|Restarting task h1_0723.55_S5R2__159_S5R3a_0 using einstein_S5R3 version 415
17/01/2008 10:25:19|Milkyway@home|Starting gs_111_1200553934_69987_0
17/01/2008 10:25:19|Milkyway@home|Starting task gs_111_1200553934_69987_0 using astronomy version 113
17/01/2008 11:09:43|Milkyway@home|Computation for task gs_111_1200553934_69987_0 finished
17/01/2008 11:09:43|Milkyway@home|Output file gs_111_1200553934_69987_0_0 for task gs_111_1200553934_69987_0 absent
17/01/2008 11:09:43|sudoku|Restarting task B0728324062_12__alpha9_1 using sudoku version 539
17/01/2008 11:09:54|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 0 seconds of work, reporting 1 completed tasks
17/01/2008 11:10:00|Milkyway@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks


BOINC was started at 08:10:59

Result output:

<![CDATA[
<message>
One or more arguments are invalid (0x80000003) - exit code -2147483645 (0x80000003)
</message>
ID: 1524 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Sou'westerly

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 07
Posts: 5
Credit: 5,401
RAC: 0
Message 1584 - Posted: 24 Jan 2008, 19:47:04 UTC

I had the dreaded windows pop up tonight. The MS error report was:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
<DATABASE>
<EXE NAME="astronomy_1.13_windows_intelx86.exe" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_PRIVACY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="astronomy_1.13_windows_intelx86.exe" SIZE="1007616" CHECKSUM="0xA668A8A" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0xFBD5A" LINKER_VERSION="0x0" LINK_DATE="12/13/2007 00:45:16" UPTO_LINK_DATE="12/13/2007 00:45:16" />
</EXE>
<EXE NAME="kernel32.dll" FILTER="GRABMI_FILTER_THISFILEONLY">
<MATCHING_FILE NAME="kernel32.dll" SIZE="984576" CHECKSUM="0xF0B331F6" BIN_FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.3119" BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.3119" PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.3119" FILE_DESCRIPTION="Windows NT BASE API Client DLL" COMPANY_NAME="Microsoft Corporation" PRODUCT_NAME="Microsoft® Windows® Operating System" FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.3119 (xpsp_sp2_gdr.070416-1301)" ORIGINAL_FILENAME="kernel32" INTERNAL_NAME="kernel32" LEGAL_COPYRIGHT="© Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved." VERFILEDATEHI="0x0" VERFILEDATELO="0x0" VERFILEOS="0x40004" VERFILETYPE="0x2" MODULE_TYPE="WIN32" PE_CHECKSUM="0xF9293" LINKER_VERSION="0x50001" UPTO_BIN_FILE_VERSION="5.1.2600.3119" UPTO_BIN_PRODUCT_VERSION="5.1.2600.3119" LINK_DATE="04/16/2007 15:52:53" UPTO_LINK_DATE="04/16/2007 15:52:53" VER_LANGUAGE="English (United States) [0x409]" />
</EXE>
</DATABASE>

Best of luck with your search, Dave.
ID: 1584 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Ensor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Nov 07
Posts: 20
Credit: 39,712
RAC: 0
Message 1612 - Posted: 27 Jan 2008, 20:56:03 UTC


Another couple of oddities to report.

Firstly, WU #2755228 ended with a "Compute Error" on my host, though the next cruncher completed it without issue.

Secondly, WU #1545214 is causing problems for every host it's been assigned to. For most of us it's showing as a "No reply".

I notice it's name has a corrupted character in it, which might have something to do with it.


TTFN - Pete.


ID: 1612 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile banditwolf
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 2425
Credit: 524,164
RAC: 0
Message 1614 - Posted: 28 Jan 2008, 1:41:11 UTC

I have had a few of those that error for everybody. They really do need to be pulled out.
ID: 1614 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Travis
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 07
Posts: 2046
Credit: 26,480
RAC: 0
Message 1618 - Posted: 28 Jan 2008, 22:31:37 UTC - in response to Message 1614.  

I have had a few of those that error for everybody. They really do need to be pulled out.


i'll try and remove them from the database - hopefully that wont cause other problems.
ID: 1618 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Error report

©2024 Astroinformatics Group