Message boards :
News :
scheduler update
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
I updated the scheduler, so hopefully it should be correctly sending out SSE2 applications. Let me know if it's working here. --Travis |
Send message Joined: 15 Feb 10 Posts: 1 Credit: 159,982 RAC: 0 |
SSE2 is working for me. I got two work units a couple hours ago. -kordoch |
Send message Joined: 3 May 10 Posts: 74 Credit: 1,532,760 RAC: 0 |
Hi Travis everything seems to be back to normal if thats the right word SSE2 apps running well. Once BOINC gets the runtime right it will really be back to normal. Is there any downtime planned this week? |
Send message Joined: 29 Sep 09 Posts: 18 Credit: 46,059 RAC: 0 |
Does this mean it will properly send NON-SSE2 WU's to the old AMD machines which do NOT support SSE2? |
Send message Joined: 8 May 10 Posts: 576 Credit: 15,979,383 RAC: 0 |
Does this mean it will properly send NON-SSE2 WU's to the old AMD machines which do NOT support SSE2? That should have been fixed a long time ago. The patch to the scheduler to actually send out SSE2 ones was apparently not applied before. |
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 09 Posts: 1 Credit: 1,251,478 RAC: 0 |
I updated the scheduler, so hopefully it should be correctly sending out SSE2 applications. Let me know if it's working here.<br>--Travis It seems to be okay. Here is the result from my boinc log: =========CUT========== 11/6/2010 9:40:26 AM Milkyway@home Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks 11/6/2010 9:40:29 AM Milkyway@home Started download of milkyway_0.45_windows_intelx86__sse2.exe 11/6/2010 9:40:29 AM Milkyway@home Started download of msvcp100.dll 11/6/2010 9:40:31 AM Milkyway@home Finished download of milkyway_0.45_windows_intelx86__sse2.exe 11/6/2010 9:40:31 AM Milkyway@home Started download of msvcr100.dll 11/6/2010 9:40:33 AM Milkyway@home Finished download of msvcp100.dll 11/6/2010 9:40:33 AM Milkyway@home Started download of p-82-3s-edge.txt 11/6/2010 9:40:34 AM Milkyway@home Finished download of p-82-3s-edge.txt 11/6/2010 9:40:34 AM Milkyway@home Started download of stars-td82-2stream_40.txt 11/6/2010 9:40:36 AM Milkyway@home Finished download of msvcr100.dll 11/6/2010 9:40:36 AM Milkyway@home Started download of de_separation_82_3s_40_2_1107457_1289047887_search_parameters 11/6/2010 9:40:37 AM Milkyway@home Finished download of de_separation_82_3s_40_2_1107457_1289047887_search_parameters 11/6/2010 9:40:47 AM Milkyway@home Finished download of stars-td82-2stream_40.txt 11/6/2010 9:40:47 AM Milkyway@home Starting de_separation_82_3s_40_2_1107457_1289047887_1 11/6/2010 9:40:47 AM Milkyway@home Starting task de_separation_82_3s_40_2_1107457_1289047887_1 using milkyway version 45 11/6/2010 9:41:28 AM Milkyway@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 11/6/2010 9:41:28 AM Milkyway@home Requesting new tasks 11/6/2010 9:41:33 AM Milkyway@home Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks 11/6/2010 9:41:35 AM Milkyway@home Started download of milkyway_nbody_0.21_windows_intelx86__sse2.exe 11/6/2010 9:41:35 AM Milkyway@home Started download of orphan_model4_32768_bodies.js 11/6/2010 9:41:36 AM Milkyway@home Finished download of orphan_model4_32768_bodies.js 11/6/2010 9:41:36 AM Milkyway@home Started download of histogram_corrected_2 11/6/2010 9:41:38 AM Milkyway@home Finished download of histogram_corrected_2 11/6/2010 9:41:46 AM Milkyway@home Finished download of milkyway_nbody_0.21_windows_intelx86__sse2.exe 11/6/2010 9:41:46 AM Milkyway@home Starting de_nbody_model4_3_41374_1289052102_0 11/6/2010 9:41:46 AM Milkyway@home Starting task de_nbody_model4_3_41374_1289052102_0 using milkyway_nbody version 21 =========CUT========== |
Send message Joined: 13 Oct 10 Posts: 1 Credit: 4,570,438 RAC: 0 |
I have not gotten any tasks to run for several days. Request for tasks gives two, but they do not run. CPU is idle. I run windows 2003 server with 2 dual core xenon processors. Dick |
Send message Joined: 20 Feb 10 Posts: 3 Credit: 5,030,476 RAC: 0 |
Running 4 SSE2 apps currently, all looks good. -Zuke "I'm not slacking, my code is compiling." |
Send message Joined: 19 Jul 10 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,018,032 RAC: 0 |
Working fine on my computer, the only issue is the expected runtime being around three times higher as the resulting runtime(told me taking 33h but finished in 10 and a half hour). |
Send message Joined: 30 Oct 09 Posts: 4 Credit: 150,544 RAC: 0 |
IT'S WORKING AGAIN! I had to Reset Project to get it going. It's good to see that MW is working again; however, 27 hour work units with less than 8 days to completion forces Boinc into high priority processing dedicated to MW. Can't the WU's be broken down into smaller units of time? |
Send message Joined: 8 May 10 Posts: 576 Credit: 15,979,383 RAC: 0 |
IT'S WORKING AGAIN! I had to Reset Project to get it going. It's good to see that MW is working again; however, 27 hour work units with less than 8 days to completion forces Boinc into high priority processing dedicated to MW. Can't the WU's be broken down into smaller units of time? Are these N-body workunits? The N-body is hard to predict the actual runtime. Over the range of parameters being fit, there is a huge potential for variation. If the estimate isn't high enough, BOINC kills them off prematurely. I've sort of been working on a better, and we've been talking about maybe doing partial N-body simulations in a single workunits (which will be necessary if more bodies are required) although that would make everything more complicated. |
Send message Joined: 19 Jul 10 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,018,032 RAC: 0 |
IT'S WORKING AGAIN! I had to Reset Project to get it going. It's good to see that MW is working again; however, 27 hour work units with less than 8 days to completion forces Boinc into high priority processing dedicated to MW. Can't the WU's be broken down into smaller units of time? My last N-body announced 44h of work... finally it was done in less than 2h. I understand that that the actual runtime may be hard to prdict, but such a difference look laughable |
Send message Joined: 8 May 10 Posts: 576 Credit: 15,979,383 RAC: 0 |
My last N-body announced 44h of work... finally it was done in less than 2h. I understand that that the actual runtime may be hard to prdict, but such a difference look laughable The workunits need an upper bound for the number of FLOPs needed. Right now the same number I think is used for all in a set of workunits. Over the parameters being fit, the individual workunits vary by a large factor, and there is an element of randomness as well. The estimates need to be refined for individual workunits. |
Send message Joined: 15 Aug 10 Posts: 6 Credit: 41,856 RAC: 0 |
Hi, my non-SSE2 Pentium II generates an abort of the actual jobs as it does before ... Seems to get SSE2-Jobs continuously. Post Error-Message as soon as i can get access to the machine. Kind regards Jörg |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group