Message boards :
Application Code Discussion :
SSE2 application behaviour (Win32, Vista, 32/64 CPU) ~120% better is nominal
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 12 Jun 09 Posts: 12 Credit: 564,132 RAC: 0 |
My CPU is this : OS Name Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium Version 6.0.6002 Service Pack 2 Build 6002 System Model SR5 250 NX System Type X86-based PC Processor Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2140 @ 1.60GHz, 1600 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s) BIOS Version/Date American Megatrends Inc. 5.14, 8/10/2007 SMBIOS Version 2.4 +++ VIA INTEL CPU IDENT APP +++ Intel(R) Processor Identification Utility Version: 4.23.20100812 Operating System: 6.0-6002-Service Pack 2 Number of processors in system: 1 Current processor: #1 Active cores per processor: 2 Processor Name: Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU E2140 @ 1.60GHz Type: 0 Family: 6 Model: F Stepping: D Revision: A3 Maximum CPUID Level: A L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KB L1 Data Cache: 2 x 32 KB L2 Cache: 1 MB Enhanced Intel SpeedStep(R) Technology: Yes MMX(TM): Yes Intel(R) SSE: Yes Intel(R) SSE2: Yes Intel(R) SSE3: Yes Intel(R) SSE4: No Enhanced Halt State: Yes Execute Disable Bit: Yes Intel(R) Hyper-Threading Technology: No Intel(R) 64 Architecture: Yes Intel(R) Virtualization Technology: No Expected Processor Frequency: 1.60 GHz Reported Processor Frequency: 1.60 GHz Expected System Bus Frequency: 800 MHz Reported System Bus Frequency: 800 MHz ++++++++++++ Outcome ++++++++++++ Your SSE2 application is running about 120% better than the more bare bones application that was distributed. Tick rate % (old application) : 0.001 per second (mostly invariant) Tick rate % (SSE2) : ~0.002 per second, (-/+) 10% variance |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group