Message boards :
Number crunching :
Please post app 1.17/1.18/1.19 memory leaks/errors
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 21 Dec 07 Posts: 69 Credit: 7,048,412 RAC: 0 |
1.18 seems to be working fine on my systems (64bit Ubuntu Gutsy). It seems to be a bit faster than previous versions too (under 7 minutes on my quad), but perhaps we have slightly shorter work units now, so I can't really say for sure. Join the #1 Aussie Alliance on MilkyWay! |
Send message Joined: 29 Dec 07 Posts: 9 Credit: 100,140,182 RAC: 0 |
32-bit Linux openSuSE 10.2, application 1.18 gives following error: Milkyway@home 5 Mar 2008 15:41:31 Starting gs_281_1204712600_2671_4 Milkyway@home 5 Mar 2008 15:41:31 Starting task gs_281_1204712600_2671_4 using astronomy version 118 Milkyway@home 5 Mar 2008 15:41:32 Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec Milkyway@home 5 Mar 2008 15:41:32 Reason: Unrecoverable error for result gs_281_1204712600_2671_4 (process exited with code 22 (0x16, -234)) Milkyway@home 5 Mar 2008 15:41:32 Computation for task gs_281_1204712600_2671_4 finished Milkyway@home 5 Mar 2008 15:41:32 Output file gs_281_1204712600_2671_4_0 for task gs_281_1204712600_2671_4 absent Milkyway@home 5 Mar 2008 15:41:32 Starting gs_280_1204746619_18995_1 [edit]the same error as is reported by Arcturus[/edit] 1.16 was OK. |
Send message Joined: 29 Sep 07 Posts: 18 Credit: 4,533,464 RAC: 0 |
Hello on my debian etch 32 Bit Linux 2.6.18-4-686 all 4 ap 1.18 crashed immediately after starting. stderr out <core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 22 (0x16, -234) </message> <stderr_txt> </stderr_txt> ]]> resultid=4594288 resultid=4594216 2 results are not reported yet. Matthias |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 |
Hello on my debian etch 32 Bit Linux 2.6.18-4-686 I've compiled a 32 bit new app about 15 min ago that will work. Both Travis and Dave got the links. So it depends now on when they'll be back in. (what timezone are they at ?) Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 07 Posts: 66 Credit: 1,002,668 RAC: 0 |
No 'problems' as such for a couple of 1.18s on a P4 2.4 XP32 machine. But ... No progress indicator (stuck on zero), and WUs finished much quicker than usual (10 minutes instead of 23). Claimed credit is in same ratio for 1.13/1.16 WUs, but the granted 6.5 makes these *very* generous in credit terms! 05/03/08 08:50:54|Milkyway@home|Starting gs_280_1204761652_27388_0 05/03/08 08:50:55|Milkyway@home|Starting task gs_280_1204761652_27388_0 using astronomy version 118 05/03/08 09:02:51|Milkyway@home|Computation for task gs_280_1204761652_27388_0 finished 05/03/08 09:02:51|Milkyway@home|Starting gs_280_1204761652_27389_0 05/03/08 09:02:51|Milkyway@home|Starting task gs_280_1204761652_27389_0 using astronomy version 118 05/03/08 09:02:54|Milkyway@home|[file_xfer] Started upload of file gs_280_1204761652_27388_0_0 05/03/08 09:02:57|Milkyway@home|[file_xfer] Finished upload of file gs_280_1204761652_27388_0_0 05/03/08 09:02:57|Milkyway@home|[file_xfer] Throughput 2709 bytes/sec 05/03/08 09:09:21|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user 05/03/08 09:09:21|Milkyway@home|Reporting 1 tasks 05/03/08 09:09:26|Milkyway@home|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 511] 05/03/08 09:09:26|Milkyway@home|Deferring communication for 7 sec 05/03/08 09:09:26|Milkyway@home|Reason: requested by project 05/03/08 09:14:43|Milkyway@home|Computation for task gs_280_1204761652_27389_0 finished 05/03/08 09:14:46|Milkyway@home|[file_xfer] Started upload of file gs_280_1204761652_27389_0_0 05/03/08 09:14:48|Milkyway@home|[file_xfer] Finished upload of file gs_280_1204761652_27389_0_0 05/03/08 09:14:48|Milkyway@home|[file_xfer] Throughput 2598 bytes/sec 05/03/08 09:22:19|Milkyway@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user 05/03/08 09:22:19|Milkyway@home|Reporting 1 tasks 05/03/08 09:22:24|Milkyway@home|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 511] 05/03/08 09:22:24|Milkyway@home|Deferring communication for 7 sec 05/03/08 09:22:24|Milkyway@home|Reason: requested by project Results (with a 1.16 for comparison): 4590812 4416448 5 Mar 2008 6:43:43 UTC 5 Mar 2008 9:22:21 UTC Over Success Done 642.61 1.34 6.50 4590811 4416447 5 Mar 2008 6:43:43 UTC 5 Mar 2008 9:09:22 UTC Over Success Done 642.09 1.34 6.50 4563107 4389222 4 Mar 2008 18:28:31 UTC 4 Mar 2008 19:37:05 UTC Over Success Done 1,606.17 3.35 6.50 Will try a couple of units on the other machines now. Al. |
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 647 Credit: 27,592,547 RAC: 0 |
Damn... whereas the new 1.18 WUs are running fine on my new laptop (Win XP Sp2) I've trashed a lot of WUs (while I was asleep so I couldn't stop it) on my old Win2K box. Seems Win 2K has a problem with the new ones? *sniff* stderr out Lovely greetings, Cori |
Send message Joined: 2 Jan 08 Posts: 123 Credit: 69,524,618 RAC: 953 |
Have gotten this error on the last 60 WU's as soon as they start, both 1.17 and 1.18. Using Linux Fedora Core 6, none have been successful, <core_client_version>5.10.21</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 22 (0x16, -234) </message> <stderr_txt> 2008-03-05 06:10:03 [Milkyway@home] Starting gs_281_1204711021_258_0 execv: No such file or directory 2008-03-05 06:10:03 [Milkyway@home] [error] Process creation (../../projects/milkyway.cs.rpi.edu_milkyway/astronomy_1.15_i686-pc-linux-gnu) failed: Error -1, errno=8 </stderr_txt> EDIT:: Have just checked and you better make that 80 crashed WU's as all 20 that were on my computer have errored out as well. |
Send message Joined: 28 Aug 07 Posts: 52 Credit: 8,353,747 RAC: 0 |
No problems so far on WinXP SP2 (1.18) without progress bar |
Send message Joined: 18 Nov 07 Posts: 280 Credit: 2,442,757 RAC: 0 |
Everything seems to be running fine on this Athlon 64 with Windows XP SP3 RC, except without a working progress bar. |
Send message Joined: 5 Feb 08 Posts: 236 Credit: 49,648 RAC: 0 |
Everything seems to be running fine on this Athlon 64 with Windows XP SP3 RC, except without a working progress bar. OK everyone. The new linux 32bit is not working as of now. Cruncher has compiled a new one and we should have this up later today. Also, the progress is not working on the windows build. This was due to a global constant not being set. Hopefully this is fixed with the build we'll be putting up later today. Dave Przybylo MilkyWay@home Developer Department of Computer Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
Send message Joined: 22 Feb 08 Posts: 1 Credit: 287,113 RAC: 0 |
Ran first 1.19 WU on mac ppc-darwin. Completed with no error. Progress reached 100% after about 25 min, ran for another 4 min then finished. This is the same way 1.13 ran, but at least it's working again ( all the other versions comp. error'ed ) |
Send message Joined: 24 Jan 08 Posts: 6 Credit: 14,836 RAC: 0 |
got an error like in previous posts http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/result.php?resultid=4629874 stderr out:<core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version> <![CDATA[<message>process exited with code 22 (0x16, -234)</message><stderr_txt></stderr_txt>]]> sorry, me english isn´t well Sysadm@Nbg Member of Team |
Send message Joined: 6 Sep 07 Posts: 66 Credit: 636,861 RAC: 0 |
All calm and well on my x86 Windows XP system. 1.17 is about twice as fast as 1.16 and 1.18 a tad faster yet. |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 |
All calm and well on my x86 Windows XP system. 1.17 is about twice as fast as 1.16 and 1.18 a tad faster yet. 1.19 is already listed on the apps page :) so it should get to you after your last set of wus is done. That will be interesting to see if it's all fixed now (wich i'm sure of). Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
All calm and well on my x86 Windows XP system. 1.17 is about twice as fast as 1.16 and 1.18 a tad faster yet. yeah i hope 1.19 works :) |
Send message Joined: 5 Feb 08 Posts: 236 Credit: 49,648 RAC: 0 |
All calm and well on my x86 Windows XP system. 1.17 is about twice as fast as 1.16 and 1.18 a tad faster yet. It does, i'm running it now. Dave Przybylo MilkyWay@home Developer Department of Computer Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 |
All calm and well on my x86 Windows XP system. 1.17 is about twice as fast as 1.16 and 1.18 a tad faster yet. I'm sure it will work out since i've allready tested them all ;) Just have a little faith in me ;P I know what i'm dooing... well most of the time ... LOL Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
All calm and well on my x86 Windows XP system. 1.17 is about twice as fast as 1.16 and 1.18 a tad faster yet. oh you did the windows ones too? :) i hope we get some windows popup errors soon so we can figure out where that problem is coming from. |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 |
yepp... however i'm sure it's all fixed now. Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
Send message Joined: 8 Oct 07 Posts: 52 Credit: 5,637,045 RAC: 160 |
wuid=4456887 - This one is just finished with v1.19 (Windows). The "Progress" meter worked, but not correctly. I am guessing it is off by an order of magnitude. That is, Progress only showed about 5% when it had run about 5 minutes (roughly the halfway point timewise). EDIT: I watched my second unit a little more carefully. The first 10% took about 9 minutes and the last 90% took about 2 minutes. In other words, the "Progress" meter works OK - it's just not linear. |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group