Message boards :
Number crunching :
Please post app 1.17/1.18/1.19 memory leaks/errors
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 647 Credit: 27,592,547 RAC: 0 |
Funny enough the "wrong" 1.19 app (32-bit) was running faster than the "correct" 1.17 app (64-bit).Same thing here Fine, fine... Go ahead! :-))) Lovely greetings, Cori |
Send message Joined: 8 Oct 07 Posts: 289 Credit: 3,690,838 RAC: 0 |
No those are 32bit machines apparently trying to load a 64bit app of 1.19. Nope the server picked up it was the same host and won't d/l new work because I exceeded my daily quota of 286(reduced due to 18 hrs worth of errors)Have to wait 6 1/2 hours unless quota's are reset :( |
Send message Joined: 10 Nov 07 Posts: 96 Credit: 29,931,027 RAC: 0 |
My G4 Macs that were having problems with v1.15 and vv1.17–1.18 respectively are now happily crunching with v1.19. Good work, team! |
Send message Joined: 8 Oct 07 Posts: 52 Credit: 5,636,995 RAC: 166 |
EDIT: I watched my second unit a little more carefully. The first 10% took about 9 minutes and the last 90% took about 2 minutes. In other words, the "Progress" meter works OK - it's just not linear. I didn't mean to imply that being non-linear was a problem. As long as we know what to expect, we can deal with it. |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 |
Funny enough the "wrong" 1.19 app (32-bit) was running faster than the "correct" 1.17 app (64-bit).Same thing here Well, i know what wen't wrong ... though taken a look at the time now...well not today any more BUT tomorrow that will be sure ! However, we've all had some success after all today ! all windows apps are working properly now ! So let's keep on focusin on liunx now... i'll compile some new apps tomorrow/today ...depends on you timezone... Jist don't loose your faith, today we accompilshed at least one goal... windows apps are working properly and we will fix that linux issue very soon that i'm pretty sure of ! Together we'll get it working ! Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
Send message Joined: 29 Dec 07 Posts: 9 Credit: 100,140,182 RAC: 0 |
1.19 works well so far on my 32-bit Linux box :-) |
Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 647 Credit: 27,592,547 RAC: 0 |
Ok, so I can go to bed now and leave my compi crunching under Win XP. And tomorrow I'll boot into Linux 64-bit again. *grin* Looking forward to the shiny new Linux 64-bit app, Crunch3r! :-) Nighty night everyone! *YAWN* Lovely greetings, Cori |
Send message Joined: 12 Oct 07 Posts: 77 Credit: 404,471,187 RAC: 0 |
Good work Team Milkyway |
Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0 |
1.19, but I'm back to getting the units that freeze again (seems the same prob I had before). 2 stopped at 2 secs, the next at 4:15, out of the 4 that have ran. Another at 4:54. Anything on this? whatever was changed between 1.18 and 1.19 seems to have brought back this problem for me. So looking into that may fix this problem. Progress meter counts slow until the last min then it rapidly counts up to 100%. Also the 1.18 took around 9.5 min now the 1.19 take 10.5 min. |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0 |
Well we're all well arare of those issue and tomorrow we will fix it ... Thanks. Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
1.19, but I'm back to getting the units that freeze again (seems the same prob I had before). 2 stopped at 2 secs, the next at 4:15, out of the 4 that have ran. Another at 4:54. 1.18 wasn't doing checkpointing or updating the progress at all, which probably accounts for the 1.19 being slower. The way i did the progress was (at least on the machine i tested on), the integral calculation took about 10% of the time as the likelihood calculation, so i took the progress of the first part, multiplied it by 0.1 and then took the progress of the 2nd part, multiplied it by 0.9 and added 0.1. If the numbers are a bit off, i could change it to 0.5 and 0.5 or something like that. |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
My G4 Macs that were having problems with v1.15 and vv1.17–1.18 respectively are now happily crunching with v1.19. Good work, team! unfortunatley 1.19 is the same as 1.13 for ppc macs, but then again, macs weren't having much problems with 1.13, except for the small memory leak. i'll be working on updating the ppc binary tomorrow and hopefully it'll be the new (memory leak free) version along with everything else. |
Send message Joined: 8 Oct 07 Posts: 289 Credit: 3,690,838 RAC: 0 |
The Milkway team has worked very hard today and looks like the problems with windows is about solved.Congratulations.Thanks for the communication as well. I am assuming the Linux app will be changed tommorrow so the 2 linux machines(identicals) I have that previously worked work again?It has been 2 days of errors now.Is it due to different hardware architecture that is causing some 32bit to work ok and others not?(all exact same O/S from same burned CD) The 64 bit machines never had a problem. |
Send message Joined: 21 Dec 07 Posts: 69 Credit: 7,048,412 RAC: 0 |
Seems to be working better on Windows (32bit) now than it does on 64 bit Linux. Quite a difference. I understand new Linux apps (including 64 bit) are coming but just thought I'd share. I am running Windows SBS 2003 in a virtual box on my quad (at 3.45GHz). Work units under Linux are taking approx. 7 minutes. The Windows app running in the virtual box is taking only 5.5 minutes! Join the #1 Aussie Alliance on MilkyWay! |
Send message Joined: 2 Jan 08 Posts: 123 Credit: 69,524,345 RAC: 994 |
Have gotten this error on the last 60 WU's as soon as they start, both 1.17 and 1.18. Using Linux Fedora Core 6, none have been successful, Well done all now working with 1.19 on Linux. Also well done on the Windows 1.17 application, very nice speed up, it is now as fast as Linux on the same hardware instead of half the speed. |
Send message Joined: 5 Feb 08 Posts: 236 Credit: 49,648 RAC: 0 |
The windows builds got some VERY high level optimization thanks to Cruncher. They should be just as fast if not much faster than any other builds Dave Przybylo MilkyWay@home Developer Department of Computer Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
Send message Joined: 6 Sep 07 Posts: 66 Credit: 636,861 RAC: 0 |
1.19 is already listed on the apps page :) so it should get to you after your last set of wus is done. Yet it seems to be a tad slower than both 1.17 and 1.18... Thanks. |
Send message Joined: 8 Oct 07 Posts: 289 Credit: 3,690,838 RAC: 0 |
A detach/reattach worked on the 2 linux 32 bit hosts...they are back to crunching mw now....do we still have a server problem? It has crashed once a day for 4 days now... |
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 07 Posts: 21 Credit: 21,004,179 RAC: 0 |
Getting Output file absent message on 32bit Linux, all wus errored on 2 boxes Detach/reattach, didn't work, still getting Output file absent |
Send message Joined: 8 Oct 07 Posts: 289 Credit: 3,690,838 RAC: 0 |
Getting Output file absent message on 32bit Linux, all wus errored on 2 boxes I went to synaptic package manager and d/l libstd 5.0+++ as well as detach/reattach to get mine to work as the stderr of my work showed that library as being dependent with the new app....so maybe thats why mine worked |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group