what platforms currently are getting errors?

Author	Message
Jim Wilkins Send message Joined: 1 Jan 08 Posts: 40 Credit: 1,676,165 RAC: 0	Message 2080 - Posted: 7 Mar 2008, 21:59:51 UTC - in response to Message 2067. I am seeing these user requests also on version 1.21 on Mac OSX Intel. In fact, I have 7 of them in 90 minutes. Jim well don't know about the mac stuff but just let it run. As far as i know there are no issues like those on older win platforms that cause computational errors. Though the mac app seems quite slow... I have been finishing a task usually in around 750 seconds. This strange user request glitch has only started since 1.21. Seems to have no adverse effect. Jim ID: 2080 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Travis Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0	Message 2081 - Posted: 7 Mar 2008, 22:03:20 UTC - in response to Message 2080. I am seeing these user requests also on version 1.21 on Mac OSX Intel. In fact, I have 7 of them in 90 minutes. Jim well don't know about the mac stuff but just let it run. As far as i know there are no issues like those on older win platforms that cause computational errors. Though the mac app seems quite slow... I have been finishing a task usually in around 750 seconds. This strange user request glitch has only started since 1.21. Seems to have no adverse effect. Jim the user request glitch might be because of putting 600 in the servers config.xml to hopefully let people download WUs faster. it looks like this didn't fix the problem so i'll be removing it. ID: 2081 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 2082 - Posted: 7 Mar 2008, 22:11:32 UTC I do still get the freezing problem with 1.22 on xp. Progress meter is still slow, seems to be the same as 1.21. Runs a tad slower than 1.21. ID: 2082 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Crunch3r Volunteer developer Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0	Message 2083 - Posted: 7 Mar 2008, 22:13:14 UTC - in response to Message 2082. I do still get the freezing problem with 1.22 on xp. Progress meter is still slow, seems to be the same as 1.21. Runs a tad slower than 1.21. What exactly do you mean by "freezing problem" ? Could you please specify that ? Thanks. Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! ID: 2083 · Rating: -1 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 2092 - Posted: 7 Mar 2008, 23:45:00 UTC - in response to Message 2083. I do still get the freezing problem with 1.22 on xp. Progress meter is still slow, seems to be the same as 1.21. Runs a tad slower than 1.21. What exactly do you mean by "freezing problem" ? Could you please specify that ? Thanks. The wu's only run for a brief period (generally 1 sec to 4 min, sometimes longer) and then switch to the next one, sometimes going through 8-10 before one will run fully. I think it was 1.17 that I had none do this (mentioned in that thread), all other versions I have had this with, so I think the solution could do with something that was changed for the 1.17 version but not in the others. Nothing shows up under Boinc messages. If a screen shot will help I'll get one when it shows up next, and let me know where to send it. I have gone over this in a past error thread, that is why I said I 'still' have it. Xp - sp2, 5.10.13 ID: 2092 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Crunch3r Volunteer developer Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 363 Credit: 258,227,990 RAC: 0	Message 2095 - Posted: 7 Mar 2008, 23:51:13 UTC - in response to Message 2092. The wu's only run for a brief period (generally 1 sec to 4 min, sometimes longer) and then switch to the next one, sometimes going through 8-10 before one will run fully. I think it was 1.17 that I had none do this (mentioned in that thread), all other versions I have had this with, so I think the solution could do with something that was changed for the 1.17 version but not in the others. Nothing shows up under Boinc messages. If a screen shot will help I'll get one when it shows up next, and let me know where to send it. I have gone over this in a past error thread, that is why I said I 'still' have it. Xp - sp2, 5.10.13 Sure a screenshot will help a lot since i'm not aware of such issues at all and i'm running the apps on W2K server, WXP SP2, WXPSP1, Linux and all that will compile the code... haven't seen taht issues yet. So let's see what's up in your taskmanager... hopefully that will help us solve you issues. Thanks. Join Support science! Joinc Team BOINC United now! ID: 2095 · Rating: -1 · rate: / Reply Quote

banditwolf Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0	Message 2099 - Posted: 8 Mar 2008, 1:52:05 UTC I have a screen cap, how do I send it to you? pm with email? ID: 2099 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Emanuel Send message Joined: 18 Nov 07 Posts: 280 Credit: 2,442,757 RAC: 0	Message 2104 - Posted: 8 Mar 2008, 2:42:56 UTC - in response to Message 2099. I have a screen cap, how do I send it to you? pm with email? I recommend http://www.hidebehind.com. ID: 2104 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Jim Wilkins Send message Joined: 1 Jan 08 Posts: 40 Credit: 1,676,165 RAC: 0	Message 2105 - Posted: 8 Mar 2008, 3:20:31 UTC - in response to Message 2081. I am seeing these user requests also on version 1.21 on Mac OSX Intel. In fact, I have 7 of them in 90 minutes. Jim well don't know about the mac stuff but just let it run. As far as i know there are no issues like those on older win platforms that cause computational errors. Though the mac app seems quite slow... I have been finishing a task usually in around 750 seconds. This strange user request glitch has only started since 1.21. Seems to have no adverse effect. Jim the user request glitch might be because of putting <next_rpc_delay>600</next_rpc_delay> in the servers config.xml to hopefully let people download WUs faster. it looks like this didn't fix the problem so i'll be removing it. You know, FWIW, the message says "requested by project", not "requested by user". Jim ID: 2105 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote