Message boards :
News :
Nbody updated to 0.60
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 8 May 10 Posts: 576 Credit: 15,979,383 RAC: 0 |
A pretty minor update. Report problems here. I added a 32 bit OS X one, although it doesn't get multithreaded. Update: For Windows, I got the names of the DLLs backwards for BOINC the first time for 0.60. Then BOINC's copying of the DLLs wasn't working for no particular reason. Then it turns out one of the DLLs I uploaded somehow was corrupted, but in any case it seems to now be working. So the Windows ones now say version 0.66, but nothing actually changed from the earlier ones in case you noticed those. |
Send message Joined: 5 Apr 09 Posts: 71 Credit: 6,120,786 RAC: 0 |
by any error in my house! this may be due to my file app_info? <app_info> <app> <name>milkyway</name> </app> <file_info> <name>milkyway_separation_0.82_windows_x86_64__cuda_opencl.exe</name> <executable/> </file_info> <app_version> <app_name>milkyway</app_name> <version_num>82</version_num> <flops>1.0e11</flops> <avg_ncpus>0.05</avg_ncpus> <max_ncpus>1</max_ncpus> <plan_class>cuda</plan_class> <coproc> <type>CUDA</type> <count>1</count> </coproc> <cmdline></cmdline> <file_ref> <file_name>milkyway_separation_0.82_windows_x86_64__cuda_opencl.exe</file_name> <main_program/> </file_ref> </app_version> <app> <name>milkyway_nbody</name> <user_friendly_name>MilkyWay@Home nbody Simulation</user_friendly_name> </app> <file_info> <name>milkyway_nbody_0.66_windows_x86_64__mt.exe</name> <executable/> </file_info> <file_info> <name>libgomp_nbody_0.66.dll</name> <executable/> </file_info> <file_info> <name>pthreadGC2_nbody_0.66.dll</name> <executable/> </file_info> <app_version> <app_name>milkyway_nbody</app_name> <version_num>66</version_num> <plan_class>mt</plan_class> <avg_ncpus>2</avg_ncpus> <max_ncpus>2</max_ncpus> <cmdline>--nthreads=2</cmdline> <file_ref> <file_name>milkyway_nbody_0.66_windows_x86_64__mt.exe</file_name> <main_program/> </file_ref> <file_ref> <file_name>libgomp_nbody_0.66.dll</file_name> </file_ref> <file_ref> <file_name>pthreadGC2_nbody_0.66.dll</file_name> </file_ref> </app_version> </app_info> Team Alliance francophone, boinc: 7.0.18 GA-P55-UD5, i7 860, Win 7 64 bits, 8g DDR3, GTX 470 |
Send message Joined: 8 May 10 Posts: 576 Credit: 15,979,383 RAC: 0 |
You have 2 problems. First you're trying to use the 32 bit DLLs with the 64 bit application. Second, you're missing the stuff to rename the DLLs. You need to add the It should be something like this (though I haven't tried it) |
Send message Joined: 5 Apr 09 Posts: 71 Credit: 6,120,786 RAC: 0 |
thanks you Team Alliance francophone, boinc: 7.0.18 GA-P55-UD5, i7 860, Win 7 64 bits, 8g DDR3, GTX 470 |
Send message Joined: 29 Sep 10 Posts: 54 Credit: 1,386,559 RAC: 0 |
Can linux users just stick with nbody 0.40? You just did this previous version in March. |
Send message Joined: 19 Aug 09 Posts: 23 Credit: 631,303 RAC: 0 |
Thanks Matt. I now have an Nbody WU that has made it to 18:50 run time, 34% progress, without crashing. I haven't had one go this far for weeks. |
Send message Joined: 29 Feb 08 Posts: 3 Credit: 13,094,240 RAC: 0 |
Have had 1 WU that completed & validated after weeks of 'computation errors'. Thank-you. |
Send message Joined: 8 May 10 Posts: 576 Credit: 15,979,383 RAC: 0 |
Can linux users just stick with nbody 0.40? You just did this previous version in March.0.40 is fine if it's working for you. The only major change isn't actually used right now. There was one crash which was much more likely on Windows that I fixed that I think has a small chance of happening on Linux (Particularly 32 bit) but I'm not sure |
Send message Joined: 15 Mar 10 Posts: 17 Credit: 1,221,936,867 RAC: 0 |
Thank You !!!!! I have had all of these on my WinXP64 systems fail since the last version. They are now going through. Thanks ! |
Send message Joined: 19 Aug 09 Posts: 23 Credit: 631,303 RAC: 0 |
2 Nbody completed and validated. Life is good. |
Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 2425 Credit: 524,164 RAC: 0 |
Another with no credit. I'm going to abort all of these tasks untill this is fixed. Task 56429160 Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected? If it makes sense, DON'T do it. |
Send message Joined: 8 May 10 Posts: 576 Credit: 15,979,383 RAC: 0 |
This might be your problem. Try updating your boinc. |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
Another with no credit. I'm going to abort all of these tasks untill this is fixed. Im looking into this. It's kind of weird why it's awarding zero credit. Could it because you're running an older boinc client? |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
This indeed is a problem with the older clients not playing nice with BOINC's new credit policy. I'm going to see if I can do some tweaking to make it better, but if possible you should probably upgrade your client. |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
Did some updates to the credit policy. The old BOINC clients should be awarded a more sane amount of credit (ie. not 0). |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group