Message boards :
News :
might have found the error
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
It looks like the star file was misspecified for the *22_3s_free_1/2 and *22_3s_edge_1/2 searches. I've made a new fixed star file for *22_3s_free_3 and *22_3s_edge_3 searches, and shut down the old ones. Let me know how these are working. |
Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 93 Credit: 366,882,323 RAC: 0 |
...I've made a new fixed star file for *22_3s_free_3 and *22_3s_edge_3 searches...Let me know how these are working. I've run through only about 30 of these these, but, so far, so good. Previously, my error rate had been about 10%. |
Send message Joined: 15 Mar 10 Posts: 17 Credit: 1,221,936,867 RAC: 0 |
A Follow-up... After two hours of the version '3' , I have seen *zero* errors on them. Still having a few errors on the version '1' and '2' WUs as those batches run their course. It looks like the problem is solved. Thx. |
Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 93 Credit: 366,882,323 RAC: 0 |
...so far, so good. Or, maybe not so much... This result, 319700259, shows a failure similar to the earlier runs. :-( |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
...so far, so good. Looks like the job completed successfully but for some reason the client marked it as a failure (it does have the output for the likelihood at the end). I wonder if this is due to the fact that one of the stream only likelihoods ended up being NAN. I hope the errors like this are at least less frequent... |
Send message Joined: 26 Feb 11 Posts: 170 Credit: 205,557,553 RAC: 0 |
Had some errors overnight like this : http://milkyway.cs.rpi.edu/milkyway/result.php?resultid=319788399 DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at |
Send message Joined: 12 Aug 09 Posts: 262 Credit: 92,631,041 RAC: 0 |
For edge_1 and edge_3 and free_1 and free_3 still many errors (while computing) and even more validate error for same, however wingman seems to run them fine and get validated. I have the newest driver 1.4.1741 with HD5870 and BOINC 7.0.28 on Win7 x64. Greetings from, TJ |
Send message Joined: 12 Aug 09 Posts: 262 Credit: 92,631,041 RAC: 0 |
Could it be a graphics driver problem? I run Albert@home once a while as well and they did okay since yesterday as there are many validate errors too with ati as I saw with wingman. Nvidia seems to be okay. Greetings from, TJ |
Send message Joined: 15 Mar 10 Posts: 17 Credit: 1,221,936,867 RAC: 0 |
And I have seen a number of errors on the version '3' WUs overnight as well. These seem to have an #IND in the result as: <stream_only_likelihood> -3.638176510600306 -10.877692835483177 -1.#IND00000000000 </stream_only_likelihood> |
Send message Joined: 16 Jun 08 Posts: 93 Credit: 366,882,323 RAC: 0 |
Travis said: I hope the errors like this are at least less frequent... A rough calculation with my host's results shows an error rate of about 2%-3% over the last 4 hours, or so. So, they do seem to be less frequent (for me). |
Send message Joined: 19 Jul 10 Posts: 621 Credit: 19,254,980 RAC: 1 |
I hope the errors like this are at least less frequent... Yes, errors are less frequent compared 22_3s_free_1 and 22_3s_edge_1 searches, today I had just 3 bad *free_3* WUs. So that's way better than those 11 edge/free_1 from yesterday. What I have noticed is we have a lot of WUs which need 3 results before they be validated. Here some examples: 253847186, 253944881, 254009156, 253771061, 253995223, 253888155. That's just from 1 page of my results, which still contains many "completed, validation inconclusive", some of which will very probably join this club. |
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 07 Posts: 2046 Credit: 26,480 RAC: 0 |
I hope the errors like this are at least less frequent... I've upped the quorums for some workunits a little bit because I was noticing we were getting some weird results validated. So there's no problem there, just a little bit extra validation on our end. |
©2024 Astroinformatics Group